{"title":"中国大学英语学习者综合写作能力诊断:对数线性认知诊断模型研究","authors":"Kwangmin Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While a large body of research has been accumulated that provides reliability and validity evidence for L2 integrated writing tasks, relatively little research has been conducted to examine integrated writing tasks as a means to provide diagnostic insights for teachers and learners. The current study aims to fill in this lacuna by applying a log-linear cognitive diagnostic model (LCDM) to reading-to-write integrated writing data collected from 315 Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) examinees. For this study, the integrated writing task was conceptualized as consisting of <em>language use</em>, <em>source use</em>, and <em>content</em>, with each of these unobservable attributes measured by surrogate indicators. Results showed that all the pairs of postulated attributes were positively correlated. However, the association between <em>language use</em> and <em>content</em> (r = 0.36) was not as strong as that of either <em>language use</em> and <em>source use</em> (r = 0.74) or <em>source use</em> and <em>content</em> (r = 0.90). Also, item parameters indicated that <em>language use</em> is more important than other attributes for obtaining a passing score for writing features. Lastly, the test-taker classification showed that it is impossible to master <em>source use</em> without other attributes, demonstrating the dependence of <em>source use</em> on other attributes. Implications for teaching are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 100730"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ integrated writing capability: A Log-linear Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (LCDM) study\",\"authors\":\"Kwangmin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While a large body of research has been accumulated that provides reliability and validity evidence for L2 integrated writing tasks, relatively little research has been conducted to examine integrated writing tasks as a means to provide diagnostic insights for teachers and learners. The current study aims to fill in this lacuna by applying a log-linear cognitive diagnostic model (LCDM) to reading-to-write integrated writing data collected from 315 Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) examinees. For this study, the integrated writing task was conceptualized as consisting of <em>language use</em>, <em>source use</em>, and <em>content</em>, with each of these unobservable attributes measured by surrogate indicators. Results showed that all the pairs of postulated attributes were positively correlated. However, the association between <em>language use</em> and <em>content</em> (r = 0.36) was not as strong as that of either <em>language use</em> and <em>source use</em> (r = 0.74) or <em>source use</em> and <em>content</em> (r = 0.90). Also, item parameters indicated that <em>language use</em> is more important than other attributes for obtaining a passing score for writing features. Lastly, the test-taker classification showed that it is impossible to master <em>source use</em> without other attributes, demonstrating the dependence of <em>source use</em> on other attributes. Implications for teaching are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000387\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnosing Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ integrated writing capability: A Log-linear Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (LCDM) study
While a large body of research has been accumulated that provides reliability and validity evidence for L2 integrated writing tasks, relatively little research has been conducted to examine integrated writing tasks as a means to provide diagnostic insights for teachers and learners. The current study aims to fill in this lacuna by applying a log-linear cognitive diagnostic model (LCDM) to reading-to-write integrated writing data collected from 315 Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) examinees. For this study, the integrated writing task was conceptualized as consisting of language use, source use, and content, with each of these unobservable attributes measured by surrogate indicators. Results showed that all the pairs of postulated attributes were positively correlated. However, the association between language use and content (r = 0.36) was not as strong as that of either language use and source use (r = 0.74) or source use and content (r = 0.90). Also, item parameters indicated that language use is more important than other attributes for obtaining a passing score for writing features. Lastly, the test-taker classification showed that it is impossible to master source use without other attributes, demonstrating the dependence of source use on other attributes. Implications for teaching are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.