{"title":"乙醇工业中的均衡和实物期权:建模和经验证据","authors":"Matt Davison , Nicolas Merener","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2022.100292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the last twenty years a large number of ethanol firms have established operations in the US. Ethanol, produced from corn, is blended with pure gasoline to produce fuel. Producers hold an option to turn off unprofitable plants. Blenders choose to substitute ethanol for gasoline at or beyond the mandate set by the government. We propose an equilibrium model for blenders and producers that accounts for government measures and for real optionality embedded in the industry<span>. The model, driven by corn and gasoline prices, leads to analytical expressions for the price and output of ethanol, and to policy implications on the impacts of the mandate and blend credit. The model also leads to closed form valuation for an ethanol producer. Using data between 2000 and 2017 we confirm that, as in the model, ethanol was largely priced as the maximum of rescaled gasoline and corn prices. Historical output levels between the mandate and installed capacity were explained by our theory. Finally, the share price dynamics for the largest public ethanol producer in the US was consistent in some aspects with the value of a real option.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equilibrium and real options in the ethanol industry: Modeling and empirical evidence\",\"authors\":\"Matt Davison , Nicolas Merener\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomm.2022.100292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the last twenty years a large number of ethanol firms have established operations in the US. Ethanol, produced from corn, is blended with pure gasoline to produce fuel. Producers hold an option to turn off unprofitable plants. Blenders choose to substitute ethanol for gasoline at or beyond the mandate set by the government. We propose an equilibrium model for blenders and producers that accounts for government measures and for real optionality embedded in the industry<span>. The model, driven by corn and gasoline prices, leads to analytical expressions for the price and output of ethanol, and to policy implications on the impacts of the mandate and blend credit. The model also leads to closed form valuation for an ethanol producer. Using data between 2000 and 2017 we confirm that, as in the model, ethanol was largely priced as the maximum of rescaled gasoline and corn prices. Historical output levels between the mandate and installed capacity were explained by our theory. Finally, the share price dynamics for the largest public ethanol producer in the US was consistent in some aspects with the value of a real option.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Commodity Markets\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Commodity Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851322000496\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851322000496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Equilibrium and real options in the ethanol industry: Modeling and empirical evidence
In the last twenty years a large number of ethanol firms have established operations in the US. Ethanol, produced from corn, is blended with pure gasoline to produce fuel. Producers hold an option to turn off unprofitable plants. Blenders choose to substitute ethanol for gasoline at or beyond the mandate set by the government. We propose an equilibrium model for blenders and producers that accounts for government measures and for real optionality embedded in the industry. The model, driven by corn and gasoline prices, leads to analytical expressions for the price and output of ethanol, and to policy implications on the impacts of the mandate and blend credit. The model also leads to closed form valuation for an ethanol producer. Using data between 2000 and 2017 we confirm that, as in the model, ethanol was largely priced as the maximum of rescaled gasoline and corn prices. Historical output levels between the mandate and installed capacity were explained by our theory. Finally, the share price dynamics for the largest public ethanol producer in the US was consistent in some aspects with the value of a real option.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.