{"title":"港口开发公司的战略;基于商业生态系统视角的框架及其在鹿特丹港案例中的应用","authors":"Peter W. de Langen","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2023.100089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper advances the conceptual understanding of strategies of port development companies (PDCs) through applying the business ecosystem perspective. This leads to a distinction between four stylized strategies for PDCs and associated types of services: minimalist (six services), integrator (six services) and ecosystem services (six services). An analysis of the services provided by a PDC reveals which strategy they follow. This approach is tested through a case study of Port of Rotterdam Authority (PoR for short) the state-owned PDC in charge of developing Rotterdam's port complex. This case study yields three important conclusions: first the relevance of the identified service types is confirmed, as PoR is or has been active in providing 15 of the 18 identified service types, more specifically all six ‘minimalist services’, all six ‘ecosystem services’ and three of the six ‘integrator services’. Second, PoR follows a ‘platform provider’ strategy. Third, the provision of ‘ecosystem services’ seems to become a more important part of PoRs activities. The number of provided ecosystem services has grown between 2006 and 2021 and investments in ecosystem services account for an increasing share of PoRs total investments. These results provide a basis for further research, amongst others to better understand factors that may influence the strategies of PDCs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100089"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The strategy of the port development company; a framework based on the business ecosystems perspective and an application to the case of Port of Rotterdam\",\"authors\":\"Peter W. de Langen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.martra.2023.100089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper advances the conceptual understanding of strategies of port development companies (PDCs) through applying the business ecosystem perspective. This leads to a distinction between four stylized strategies for PDCs and associated types of services: minimalist (six services), integrator (six services) and ecosystem services (six services). An analysis of the services provided by a PDC reveals which strategy they follow. This approach is tested through a case study of Port of Rotterdam Authority (PoR for short) the state-owned PDC in charge of developing Rotterdam's port complex. This case study yields three important conclusions: first the relevance of the identified service types is confirmed, as PoR is or has been active in providing 15 of the 18 identified service types, more specifically all six ‘minimalist services’, all six ‘ecosystem services’ and three of the six ‘integrator services’. Second, PoR follows a ‘platform provider’ strategy. Third, the provision of ‘ecosystem services’ seems to become a more important part of PoRs activities. The number of provided ecosystem services has grown between 2006 and 2021 and investments in ecosystem services account for an increasing share of PoRs total investments. These results provide a basis for further research, amongst others to better understand factors that may influence the strategies of PDCs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maritime Transport Research\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maritime Transport Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X23000084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Transport Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X23000084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文运用商业生态系统的视角,提出了港口开发公司战略的概念理解。这导致了PDCs和相关服务类型的四种程式化策略之间的区别:极简(六种服务)、集成商(六种服务)和生态系统服务(六种服务)。通过对PDC提供的服务进行分析,可以发现它们遵循的策略。该方法通过负责开发鹿特丹港口综合体的国有PDC鹿特丹港务局(Port of Rotterdam Authority,简称PoR)的案例研究进行了验证。本案例研究得出了三个重要结论:首先,确定的服务类型的相关性得到了确认,因为PoR正在或已经积极提供18种确定的服务类型中的15种,更具体地说,所有六种“极简服务”,所有六种“生态系统服务”和六种“集成服务”中的三种。其次,PoR遵循“平台提供商”战略。第三,提供“生态系统服务”似乎成为了项目管理人员活动中更重要的一部分。2006年至2021年期间,提供的生态系统服务数量有所增加,生态系统服务投资在por总投资中所占的份额越来越大。这些结果为进一步研究提供了基础,其中包括更好地了解可能影响PDCs策略的因素。
The strategy of the port development company; a framework based on the business ecosystems perspective and an application to the case of Port of Rotterdam
This paper advances the conceptual understanding of strategies of port development companies (PDCs) through applying the business ecosystem perspective. This leads to a distinction between four stylized strategies for PDCs and associated types of services: minimalist (six services), integrator (six services) and ecosystem services (six services). An analysis of the services provided by a PDC reveals which strategy they follow. This approach is tested through a case study of Port of Rotterdam Authority (PoR for short) the state-owned PDC in charge of developing Rotterdam's port complex. This case study yields three important conclusions: first the relevance of the identified service types is confirmed, as PoR is or has been active in providing 15 of the 18 identified service types, more specifically all six ‘minimalist services’, all six ‘ecosystem services’ and three of the six ‘integrator services’. Second, PoR follows a ‘platform provider’ strategy. Third, the provision of ‘ecosystem services’ seems to become a more important part of PoRs activities. The number of provided ecosystem services has grown between 2006 and 2021 and investments in ecosystem services account for an increasing share of PoRs total investments. These results provide a basis for further research, amongst others to better understand factors that may influence the strategies of PDCs.