人工智能革命与协调失败:理论与证据

IF 1.3 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Macroeconomics Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jmacro.2023.103561
Burak Ünveren, Tunç Durmaz, Seçkin Sunal
{"title":"人工智能革命与协调失败:理论与证据","authors":"Burak Ünveren,&nbsp;Tunç Durmaz,&nbsp;Seçkin Sunal","doi":"10.1016/j.jmacro.2023.103561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This paper analyzes theoretically and empirically the coordination failure problem inherent within the 21st-century automation revolution. First, we build a general equilibrium model with labor-saving artificial intelligence (AI) technology that is developed through R&amp;D investments in automation. The model exhibits multiple market equilibria due to a positive feedback loop between AI investments and </span>general economic activities. The available evidence supports our model's predictions regarding the interaction between AI technologies, income inequality, and wages. We also find strong empirical support for multiple equilibria in AI development—the primary prediction of our model. These empirical and theoretical results suggest that AI development can cause coordination failures, thereby creating leaders and followers in automation. However, according to our policy analysis, R&amp;D subsidies and public-private partnerships are efficient coordination devices to tackle this problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Macroeconomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI revolution and coordination failure: Theory and evidence\",\"authors\":\"Burak Ünveren,&nbsp;Tunç Durmaz,&nbsp;Seçkin Sunal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmacro.2023.103561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>This paper analyzes theoretically and empirically the coordination failure problem inherent within the 21st-century automation revolution. First, we build a general equilibrium model with labor-saving artificial intelligence (AI) technology that is developed through R&amp;D investments in automation. The model exhibits multiple market equilibria due to a positive feedback loop between AI investments and </span>general economic activities. The available evidence supports our model's predictions regarding the interaction between AI technologies, income inequality, and wages. We also find strong empirical support for multiple equilibria in AI development—the primary prediction of our model. These empirical and theoretical results suggest that AI development can cause coordination failures, thereby creating leaders and followers in automation. However, according to our policy analysis, R&amp;D subsidies and public-private partnerships are efficient coordination devices to tackle this problem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Macroeconomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Macroeconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164070423000617\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Macroeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164070423000617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从理论和实证两方面分析了21世纪自动化革命所固有的协调失效问题。首先,我们用节省劳动力的人工智能(AI)技术构建了一个一般均衡模型,该技术是通过自动化研发投资开发的。由于人工智能投资和一般经济活动之间的正反馈循环,该模型显示出多重市场均衡。现有证据支持我们的模型关于人工智能技术、收入不平等和工资之间相互作用的预测。我们还发现了人工智能发展中的多重均衡的强有力的经验支持,这是我们模型的主要预测。这些实证和理论结果表明,人工智能的发展可能导致协调失败,从而产生自动化的领导者和追随者。然而,根据我们的政策分析,研发补贴和公私伙伴关系是解决这一问题的有效协调手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI revolution and coordination failure: Theory and evidence

This paper analyzes theoretically and empirically the coordination failure problem inherent within the 21st-century automation revolution. First, we build a general equilibrium model with labor-saving artificial intelligence (AI) technology that is developed through R&D investments in automation. The model exhibits multiple market equilibria due to a positive feedback loop between AI investments and general economic activities. The available evidence supports our model's predictions regarding the interaction between AI technologies, income inequality, and wages. We also find strong empirical support for multiple equilibria in AI development—the primary prediction of our model. These empirical and theoretical results suggest that AI development can cause coordination failures, thereby creating leaders and followers in automation. However, according to our policy analysis, R&D subsidies and public-private partnerships are efficient coordination devices to tackle this problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1979, the Journal of Macroeconomics has published theoretical and empirical articles that span the entire range of macroeconomics and monetary economics. More specifically, the editors encourage the submission of high quality papers that are concerned with the theoretical or empirical aspects of the following broadly defined topics: economic growth, economic fluctuations, the effects of monetary and fiscal policy, the political aspects of macroeconomics, exchange rate determination and other elements of open economy macroeconomics, the macroeconomics of income inequality, and macroeconomic forecasting.
期刊最新文献
Is deflation cause for panic? Evidence from the National Banking era Traditional output dynamics: A structural perspective A bank-level analysis of interest rate pass-through in South Africa Editorial Board Job search intensity and wage rigidity in business cycles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1