影响直播购物行为意向的因素:一项跨文化研究

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2023-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103596
Shaowen Ni , Hideo Ueichi
{"title":"影响直播购物行为意向的因素:一项跨文化研究","authors":"Shaowen Ni ,&nbsp;Hideo Ueichi","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to clarify two research questions: (1) How do perceptions of livestream shopping differ between users and non-users across the United States (US), China, and Japan? and (2) Among American, Chinese, and Japanese users, how do personal traits influence perceived social presence and attitudes toward livestream shopping, and how do social presence and attitudes influence behavioral intentions toward livestream shopping? A three-country online survey was conducted in 2023. For Research Question 1, regarding perceptions of stimulating purchases, facilitating communication, and improving personal quality of life, American non-users (N = 480) were significantly more positive than Japanese non-users (N = 572); regarding improving personal quality of life and societal benefits, Chinese users (N = 563) were significantly more positive than American users (N = 290). Results for Research Question 2 showed commonalities and differences between the US and China. Both countries showed positive effects of interpersonal orientation and trust in streamers on social presence, of change seeking and social presence on utilitarian attitudes, and of anticipated regret and social presence on hedonic attitudes. Main differences included the stronger influence of general online trust on utilitarian attitudes in the US versus the stronger influence of trust in streamers on both utilitarian and hedonic attitudes in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 103596"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing behavioral intentions in livestream shopping: A cross-cultural study\",\"authors\":\"Shaowen Ni ,&nbsp;Hideo Ueichi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to clarify two research questions: (1) How do perceptions of livestream shopping differ between users and non-users across the United States (US), China, and Japan? and (2) Among American, Chinese, and Japanese users, how do personal traits influence perceived social presence and attitudes toward livestream shopping, and how do social presence and attitudes influence behavioral intentions toward livestream shopping? A three-country online survey was conducted in 2023. For Research Question 1, regarding perceptions of stimulating purchases, facilitating communication, and improving personal quality of life, American non-users (N = 480) were significantly more positive than Japanese non-users (N = 572); regarding improving personal quality of life and societal benefits, Chinese users (N = 563) were significantly more positive than American users (N = 290). Results for Research Question 2 showed commonalities and differences between the US and China. Both countries showed positive effects of interpersonal orientation and trust in streamers on social presence, of change seeking and social presence on utilitarian attitudes, and of anticipated regret and social presence on hedonic attitudes. Main differences included the stronger influence of general online trust on utilitarian attitudes in the US versus the stronger influence of trust in streamers on both utilitarian and hedonic attitudes in China.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698923003478\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698923003478","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在澄清两个研究问题:(1)在美国、中国和日本,用户和非用户对直播购物的看法有何不同?(2)在美国、中国和日本用户中,个人特征如何影响感知到的社交存在和对直播购物的态度,社交存在和态度如何影响对直播购物行为的意图?2023年进行了一项三国在线调查。对于研究问题1,在刺激购买、促进沟通和提高个人生活质量的认知方面,美国非用户(N=480)明显高于日本非用户(N=572);在改善个人生活质量和社会效益方面,中国用户(N=563)明显高于美国用户(N=290)。研究问题2的结果显示了美国和中国之间的共同点和差异。这两个国家都表现出人际取向和对主播的信任对社会存在的积极影响,对功利态度的寻求改变和社会存在的影响,以及对享乐态度的预期遗憾和社会存在。主要差异包括,在美国,普通网络信任对功利态度的影响更强,而在中国,对主播的信任对功利和享乐态度的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors influencing behavioral intentions in livestream shopping: A cross-cultural study

This study aimed to clarify two research questions: (1) How do perceptions of livestream shopping differ between users and non-users across the United States (US), China, and Japan? and (2) Among American, Chinese, and Japanese users, how do personal traits influence perceived social presence and attitudes toward livestream shopping, and how do social presence and attitudes influence behavioral intentions toward livestream shopping? A three-country online survey was conducted in 2023. For Research Question 1, regarding perceptions of stimulating purchases, facilitating communication, and improving personal quality of life, American non-users (N = 480) were significantly more positive than Japanese non-users (N = 572); regarding improving personal quality of life and societal benefits, Chinese users (N = 563) were significantly more positive than American users (N = 290). Results for Research Question 2 showed commonalities and differences between the US and China. Both countries showed positive effects of interpersonal orientation and trust in streamers on social presence, of change seeking and social presence on utilitarian attitudes, and of anticipated regret and social presence on hedonic attitudes. Main differences included the stronger influence of general online trust on utilitarian attitudes in the US versus the stronger influence of trust in streamers on both utilitarian and hedonic attitudes in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1