基于机器学习技术的路面状况指数预测:一个案例研究

Abdualmtalab Abdualaziz Ali , Abdalrhman Milad , Amgad Hussein , Nur Izzi Md Yusoff , Usama Heneash
{"title":"基于机器学习技术的路面状况指数预测:一个案例研究","authors":"Abdualmtalab Abdualaziz Ali ,&nbsp;Abdalrhman Milad ,&nbsp;Amgad Hussein ,&nbsp;Nur Izzi Md Yusoff ,&nbsp;Usama Heneash","doi":"10.1016/j.jreng.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pavement management systems (PMS) are used by transportation government agencies to promote sustainable development and to keep road pavement conditions above the minimum performance levels at a reasonable cost. To accomplish this objective, the pavement condition is monitored to predict deterioration and determine the need for maintenance or rehabilitation at the appropriate time. The pavement condition index (PCI) is a commonly used metric to evaluate the pavement's performance. This research aims to create and evaluate prediction models for PCI values using multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), and fuzzy logic inference (FIS) models for flexible pavement sections. The authors collected field data spans for 2018 and 2021. Eight pavement distress factors were considered inputs for predicting PCI values, such as rutting, fatigue cracking, block cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, patching, potholes, and delamination. This study evaluates the performance of the three techniques based on the coefficient of determination, root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The results show that the <span><math><mrow><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> values of the ANN models increased by 51.32%, 2.02%, 36.55%, and 3.02% compared to MLR and FIS (2018 and 2021). The error in the PCI values predicted by the ANN model was significantly lower than the errors in the prediction by the FIS and MLR models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Road Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting pavement condition index based on the utilization of machine learning techniques: A case study\",\"authors\":\"Abdualmtalab Abdualaziz Ali ,&nbsp;Abdalrhman Milad ,&nbsp;Amgad Hussein ,&nbsp;Nur Izzi Md Yusoff ,&nbsp;Usama Heneash\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jreng.2023.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pavement management systems (PMS) are used by transportation government agencies to promote sustainable development and to keep road pavement conditions above the minimum performance levels at a reasonable cost. To accomplish this objective, the pavement condition is monitored to predict deterioration and determine the need for maintenance or rehabilitation at the appropriate time. The pavement condition index (PCI) is a commonly used metric to evaluate the pavement's performance. This research aims to create and evaluate prediction models for PCI values using multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), and fuzzy logic inference (FIS) models for flexible pavement sections. The authors collected field data spans for 2018 and 2021. Eight pavement distress factors were considered inputs for predicting PCI values, such as rutting, fatigue cracking, block cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, patching, potholes, and delamination. This study evaluates the performance of the three techniques based on the coefficient of determination, root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The results show that the <span><math><mrow><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> values of the ANN models increased by 51.32%, 2.02%, 36.55%, and 3.02% compared to MLR and FIS (2018 and 2021). The error in the PCI values predicted by the ANN model was significantly lower than the errors in the prediction by the FIS and MLR models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Road Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Road Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097049823000422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Road Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097049823000422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

路面管理系统(PMS)被交通政府机构用于促进可持续发展,并以合理的成本将路面状况保持在最低性能水平之上。为了实现这一目标,对路面状况进行监测,以预测劣化,并在适当的时候确定维护或修复的必要性。路面状况指数(PCI)是评估路面性能的常用指标。本研究旨在使用多元线性回归(MLR)、人工神经网络(ANN)和模糊逻辑推理(FIS)模型为柔性路面路段创建和评估PCI值的预测模型。作者收集了2018年和2021年的实地数据。八个路面破损因素被认为是预测PCI值的输入,如车辙、疲劳开裂、块体开裂、纵向开裂、横向开裂、修补、坑洞和分层。本研究基于决定系数、均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)来评估这三种技术的性能。结果显示,与MLR和FIS(2018和2021)相比,ANN模型的R2值分别增加了51.32%、2.02%、36.55%和3.02%。ANN模型预测的PCI值的误差显著低于FIS和MLR模型预测的误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting pavement condition index based on the utilization of machine learning techniques: A case study

Pavement management systems (PMS) are used by transportation government agencies to promote sustainable development and to keep road pavement conditions above the minimum performance levels at a reasonable cost. To accomplish this objective, the pavement condition is monitored to predict deterioration and determine the need for maintenance or rehabilitation at the appropriate time. The pavement condition index (PCI) is a commonly used metric to evaluate the pavement's performance. This research aims to create and evaluate prediction models for PCI values using multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), and fuzzy logic inference (FIS) models for flexible pavement sections. The authors collected field data spans for 2018 and 2021. Eight pavement distress factors were considered inputs for predicting PCI values, such as rutting, fatigue cracking, block cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, patching, potholes, and delamination. This study evaluates the performance of the three techniques based on the coefficient of determination, root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The results show that the R2 values of the ANN models increased by 51.32%, 2.02%, 36.55%, and 3.02% compared to MLR and FIS (2018 and 2021). The error in the PCI values predicted by the ANN model was significantly lower than the errors in the prediction by the FIS and MLR models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bio-based rejuvenators in asphalt pavements: A comprehensive review and analytical study Towards green asphalt materials with lower emission of volatile organic compounds: A review on the release characteristics and its emission reduction additives Predictive modelling of volumetric and Marshall properties of asphalt mixtures modified with waste tire-derived char: A statistical neural network approach A review of the development of asphalt foaming technology Condition indices for rigid pavements: A comparative analysis of state DOTs using Michigan PMS data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1