保护性农业实践在减少一氧化二氮排放中的作用:荟萃分析

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agronomy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x
Yue Li, Ji Chen, Craig F. Drury, Mark Liebig, Jane M. F. Johnson, Zhaozhi Wang, Hao Feng, Diego Abalos
{"title":"保护性农业实践在减少一氧化二氮排放中的作用:荟萃分析","authors":"Yue Li,&nbsp;Ji Chen,&nbsp;Craig F. Drury,&nbsp;Mark Liebig,&nbsp;Jane M. F. Johnson,&nbsp;Zhaozhi Wang,&nbsp;Hao Feng,&nbsp;Diego Abalos","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract </h2><div><p>Conservation agriculture is often assumed to reduce soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Yet, studies analyzing the specific effect of conservation agriculture practices on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions give contradictory results. Herein, we synthesized a comprehensive database on the three main conservation agriculture practices (cover crops, diversified crop rotations, and no-till and/or reduced tillage (NT/RT)) to elucidate the role of conservation practices on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Further, we used a random meta-forest approach to identify the most important predictors of the effects of these practices on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Averaged across all comparisons, NT/RT significantly decreased soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 11% (95% CI: –19 to –1%) compared to conventional tillage. The reductions due to NT/RT were more commonly observed in humid climates and in soils with an initial carbon content &lt; 20 g kg<sup>–1</sup>. The implementation of cover crops and diversified crop rotations led to variable effects on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Cover crops were more likely to reduce soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions at neutral soil pH, and in soils with intermediate carbon (~20 g kg<sup>–1</sup>) and nitrogen (~3 g kg<sup>–1</sup>) contents. Diversified crop rotations tended to increase soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in temperate regions and neutral to alkaline soils. Our results provide a comprehensive predictive framework to understand the conditions in which the adoption of various conservation agriculture practices can contribute to climate change mitigation. Combining these results with a similar mechanistic understanding of conservation agriculture impacts on ecosystem services and crop production will pave the way for a wider adoption globally of these management practices.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of conservation agriculture practices in mitigating N2O emissions: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yue Li,&nbsp;Ji Chen,&nbsp;Craig F. Drury,&nbsp;Mark Liebig,&nbsp;Jane M. F. Johnson,&nbsp;Zhaozhi Wang,&nbsp;Hao Feng,&nbsp;Diego Abalos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h2>Abstract </h2><div><p>Conservation agriculture is often assumed to reduce soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Yet, studies analyzing the specific effect of conservation agriculture practices on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions give contradictory results. Herein, we synthesized a comprehensive database on the three main conservation agriculture practices (cover crops, diversified crop rotations, and no-till and/or reduced tillage (NT/RT)) to elucidate the role of conservation practices on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Further, we used a random meta-forest approach to identify the most important predictors of the effects of these practices on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Averaged across all comparisons, NT/RT significantly decreased soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 11% (95% CI: –19 to –1%) compared to conventional tillage. The reductions due to NT/RT were more commonly observed in humid climates and in soils with an initial carbon content &lt; 20 g kg<sup>–1</sup>. The implementation of cover crops and diversified crop rotations led to variable effects on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Cover crops were more likely to reduce soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions at neutral soil pH, and in soils with intermediate carbon (~20 g kg<sup>–1</sup>) and nitrogen (~3 g kg<sup>–1</sup>) contents. Diversified crop rotations tended to increase soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in temperate regions and neutral to alkaline soils. Our results provide a comprehensive predictive framework to understand the conditions in which the adoption of various conservation agriculture practices can contribute to climate change mitigation. Combining these results with a similar mechanistic understanding of conservation agriculture impacts on ecosystem services and crop production will pave the way for a wider adoption globally of these management practices.</p></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00911-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

保护性农业通常被认为可以减少土壤N2O的排放。然而,分析保护性农业实践对N2O排放的具体影响的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。在此,我们综合了三种主要保护性农业实践(覆盖作物、多样化作物轮作和免耕和/或减少耕作(NT/RT))的综合数据库,以阐明保护性农业实践对N2O排放的作用。此外,我们使用随机元森林方法来确定这些做法对土壤N2O排放影响的最重要预测因子。在所有比较中平均来看,与传统耕作相比,NT/RT显著减少了11%的土壤N2O排放(95% CI: -19至-1%)。由于NT/RT的减少在湿润气候和具有初始碳含量的土壤中更为常见。20g kg-1。覆盖作物和不同轮作方式对土壤N2O排放的影响是不同的。在中性土壤pH和碳(~20 g kg-1)、氮(~3 g kg-1)含量适中的土壤中,覆盖作物更有可能减少N2O的排放。在温带地区和中性至碱性土壤中,多样化作物轮作倾向于增加土壤N2O排放。我们的研究结果提供了一个全面的预测框架,以了解采用各种保护性农业做法有助于减缓气候变化的条件。将这些结果与保护性农业对生态系统服务和作物生产影响的类似机制理解相结合,将为在全球范围内更广泛地采用这些管理实践铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of conservation agriculture practices in mitigating N2O emissions: A meta-analysis

Abstract 

Conservation agriculture is often assumed to reduce soil N2O emissions. Yet, studies analyzing the specific effect of conservation agriculture practices on N2O emissions give contradictory results. Herein, we synthesized a comprehensive database on the three main conservation agriculture practices (cover crops, diversified crop rotations, and no-till and/or reduced tillage (NT/RT)) to elucidate the role of conservation practices on N2O emissions. Further, we used a random meta-forest approach to identify the most important predictors of the effects of these practices on soil N2O emissions. Averaged across all comparisons, NT/RT significantly decreased soil N2O emissions by 11% (95% CI: –19 to –1%) compared to conventional tillage. The reductions due to NT/RT were more commonly observed in humid climates and in soils with an initial carbon content < 20 g kg–1. The implementation of cover crops and diversified crop rotations led to variable effects on soil N2O emissions. Cover crops were more likely to reduce soil N2O emissions at neutral soil pH, and in soils with intermediate carbon (~20 g kg–1) and nitrogen (~3 g kg–1) contents. Diversified crop rotations tended to increase soil N2O emissions in temperate regions and neutral to alkaline soils. Our results provide a comprehensive predictive framework to understand the conditions in which the adoption of various conservation agriculture practices can contribute to climate change mitigation. Combining these results with a similar mechanistic understanding of conservation agriculture impacts on ecosystem services and crop production will pave the way for a wider adoption globally of these management practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation rather than adoption: a case study of cropping system change in West Africa Versatile crop yield estimator Carbon footprint of mixed farming crop-livestock rotational-based grazing beef systems using long term experimental data Multidimensional measures of farmer well-being: A scoping review Determinants of oilseed rape-service plant intercropping performance variability across a farmers’ fields network in Western Switzerland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1