{"title":"宾夕法尼亚州小蓝茎对ACC酶抑制剂的耐受性","authors":"Peter Landschoot","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Little bluestem [<i>Schizachyrium scoparium</i> (Michx.) Nash.] is a warm-season perennial grass that is sometimes planted with fine fescues (<i>Festuca</i> spp.) in infrequently mowed rough areas on golf courses, commonly referred to as naturalized or native grass areas and minimal-mow rough. This native species is often used for its aesthetically pleasing reddish-gold culms and inflorescences during late summer and fall.</p><p>In Pennsylvania, perennial and annual grass weeds invade fine fescue/little bluestem rough, and golf course managers occasionally use postemergence herbicides as control options (Landschoot, <span>2018</span>). ACCase-inhibiting herbicides control a variety of grass weeds, but relatively few studies have examined the effects of these herbicides on little bluestem (Patton et al., <span>2021</span>).</p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of little bluestem to four ACCase-inhibiting herbicides: fenoxaprop, fluazifop, quizalofop, and sethoxydim. Experiments were conducted in 2021 and 2022 in adjacent areas at the Landscape Management Research Center in University Park, PA. Both experiments were performed in an eight-year-old non-irrigated and non-fertilized stand of strong creeping red fescue (<i>Festuca rubra</i> ssp. <i>rubra</i> Gaudin) ‘Garnet’ and little bluestem ‘Ft. Indiantown Gap-PA Ecotype’ (Ernst Conservation Seed). Little bluestem visual cover in the experiment areas at the time of treatment applications was approximately 50-60%. The stand was mowed once per year in October at 5 inches. Soil at the experiment site is a Hagerstown silt loam (fine, mixed, mesic, Typic Hapludalf), with a pH of 6.4, 38 mg/kg Mehlich-3 P, and 186 mg/kg Mehlich-3 K.</p><p>Herbicide treatments included fenoxaprop (Acclaim Extra, 0.57 lb fenoxaprop/gal; Bayer Environmental Science) at 28 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant (Lesco 90/10 Nonionic Surfactant; Lesco Inc.); sethoxydim (Segment II, 1.5 lb sethoxydim/gal; BASF) at 16 fl oz product/acre with methylated seed oil at 1.5 pints/acre (Lesco Methylated Seed Oil; Lesco Inc.); fluazifop (Fusilade II T/O, 2 lb fluazifop/gal; Syngenta Crop Protection LLC) at 16 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant; and quizalofop (Assure II, 0.88 lb quizalofop/gal; Amvac Chemical Corp.) at 12 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant. A non-treated control was included in each experiment. Herbicide treatment rates were based on maximum product label rates for control of grass weeds in fine fescue. All treatments were applied once on June 17, 2021, and June 8, 2022. Application dates coincide with preferred timing for control of grass weeds in central Pennsylvania. Total precipitation during the 2021 and 2022 evaluation periods was 19.7 and 9.7 inches, respectively.</p><p>All herbicide treatments were applied using a backpack sprayer equipped with a boom fitted with a 9504E flat fan nozzle (TeeJet Technologies) at 40 psi with a water volume of 87 gal/acre. The experimental design was a randomized complete block, and each treatment was replicated three times. Plot size was 30 ft<sup>2</sup>. Criteria for evaluating herbicide effects on little bluestem included visual ratings of foliar injury, as well as inflorescence with supporting culm height and yield measurements. Foliar injury ratings were made on June 30 and July 27, 2021, and June 21 and July 22, 2022 with 0 indicating no injury and 10 representing complete desiccation of foliage. Culm/inflorescence height was assessed on September 15, 2021 and September 1, 2022 by measuring the tallest inflorescence with supporting culm in the centers of 10 plants in each plot. Yields were determined by harvesting all culms/inflorescences above the leaf canopy in each plot on September 25, 2021 and September 15, 2022 and weighing immediately after harvest. All data were subjected to analysis of variance using PROC MIXED in SAS version 9.3, and means were separated using Fisher's protected least significant difference test at <i>α</i> = 0.05.</p><p>Sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments caused noticeable injury on little bluestem foliage on all rating dates in 2021 and 2022 (Tables 1 & 2). Fenoxaprop produced higher foliar injury ratings than the control only on June 30, 2021, and injury symptoms were minor (reddening of leaf tips). Injury ratings for the sethoxydim treatment were higher than all other treatments on June 30, 2021 and June 21, 2022. However, by July 27, 2021, no differences in foliar injury were observed among sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments, and injury appeared as moderate to severe foliar desiccation. On July 22, 2022, the sethoxydim treatment produced a higher injury rating than fluazifop, and the quizalofop injury rating did not differ from sethoxydim and fluazifop treatments.</p><p>All herbicide treatments reduced culm/inflorescence heights in 2021 and 2022 when compared to controls (Tables 1 and 2). Sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments had similar effects on culms/inflorescences in 2021, reducing heights by >50% relative to the control. The fenoxaprop treatment produced height reductions intermediate between the control and the other herbicide treatments in 2021.</p><p>In 2022, sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments reduced culm/inflorescence heights by >50% compared with the control; however, the fluazifop treatment had a stronger effect on height reduction than quizalofop. As in 2021, the 2022 fenoxaprop treatment resulted in height reductions intermediate between the control and the other herbicide treatments.</p><p>All herbicide treatments produced lower culm/inflorescence yields compared to the controls in 2021 and 2022 (Tables 1 and 2). In 2021, yields were reduced by >50% for all herbicide treatments relative to the control, with sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments showing the greatest reductions. The fenoxaprop treatment resulted in yields that were intermediate between the control and sethoxydim and fluazifop treatments, whereas quizalofop treatment yields were not different from those of sethoxydim, fluazifop, and fenoxaprop.</p><p>In 2022, sethoxydim and fluazifop treatments showed the greatest yield reductions, followed by quizalofop. Fenoxaprop produced higher yields than all other herbicide treatments.</p><p>Results of this study demonstrate that the ACCase-inhibiting herbicides sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop, and to a lesser degree fenoxaprop, cause foliar injury and inhibit culm/inflorescence development of little bluestem. Differences in foliar injury, culm/inflorescence heights, and yield means between years could have been due to higher rainfall amounts in 2021 compared with 2022, as well as subtle variation in soil conditions and other factors between experiment sites. In most cases, sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop injured and stunted little bluestem plants to a greater degree than fenoxaprop. These findings are similar to those of Patton et al. (<span>2021</span>) in which sethoxydim caused >30% injury to little bluestem plants. Practitioners should be aware that applications of the ACCase-inhibiting herbicides sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop can be detrimental to little bluestem when used to control grass weeds in mixed little bluestem/fine fescue rough.</p><p><b>Peter Landschoot</b>: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft.</p><p>The author declares no conflict of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20236","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tolerance of little bluestem to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in Pennsylvania\",\"authors\":\"Peter Landschoot\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cft2.20236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Little bluestem [<i>Schizachyrium scoparium</i> (Michx.) Nash.] is a warm-season perennial grass that is sometimes planted with fine fescues (<i>Festuca</i> spp.) in infrequently mowed rough areas on golf courses, commonly referred to as naturalized or native grass areas and minimal-mow rough. This native species is often used for its aesthetically pleasing reddish-gold culms and inflorescences during late summer and fall.</p><p>In Pennsylvania, perennial and annual grass weeds invade fine fescue/little bluestem rough, and golf course managers occasionally use postemergence herbicides as control options (Landschoot, <span>2018</span>). ACCase-inhibiting herbicides control a variety of grass weeds, but relatively few studies have examined the effects of these herbicides on little bluestem (Patton et al., <span>2021</span>).</p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of little bluestem to four ACCase-inhibiting herbicides: fenoxaprop, fluazifop, quizalofop, and sethoxydim. Experiments were conducted in 2021 and 2022 in adjacent areas at the Landscape Management Research Center in University Park, PA. Both experiments were performed in an eight-year-old non-irrigated and non-fertilized stand of strong creeping red fescue (<i>Festuca rubra</i> ssp. <i>rubra</i> Gaudin) ‘Garnet’ and little bluestem ‘Ft. Indiantown Gap-PA Ecotype’ (Ernst Conservation Seed). Little bluestem visual cover in the experiment areas at the time of treatment applications was approximately 50-60%. The stand was mowed once per year in October at 5 inches. Soil at the experiment site is a Hagerstown silt loam (fine, mixed, mesic, Typic Hapludalf), with a pH of 6.4, 38 mg/kg Mehlich-3 P, and 186 mg/kg Mehlich-3 K.</p><p>Herbicide treatments included fenoxaprop (Acclaim Extra, 0.57 lb fenoxaprop/gal; Bayer Environmental Science) at 28 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant (Lesco 90/10 Nonionic Surfactant; Lesco Inc.); sethoxydim (Segment II, 1.5 lb sethoxydim/gal; BASF) at 16 fl oz product/acre with methylated seed oil at 1.5 pints/acre (Lesco Methylated Seed Oil; Lesco Inc.); fluazifop (Fusilade II T/O, 2 lb fluazifop/gal; Syngenta Crop Protection LLC) at 16 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant; and quizalofop (Assure II, 0.88 lb quizalofop/gal; Amvac Chemical Corp.) at 12 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant. A non-treated control was included in each experiment. Herbicide treatment rates were based on maximum product label rates for control of grass weeds in fine fescue. All treatments were applied once on June 17, 2021, and June 8, 2022. Application dates coincide with preferred timing for control of grass weeds in central Pennsylvania. Total precipitation during the 2021 and 2022 evaluation periods was 19.7 and 9.7 inches, respectively.</p><p>All herbicide treatments were applied using a backpack sprayer equipped with a boom fitted with a 9504E flat fan nozzle (TeeJet Technologies) at 40 psi with a water volume of 87 gal/acre. The experimental design was a randomized complete block, and each treatment was replicated three times. Plot size was 30 ft<sup>2</sup>. Criteria for evaluating herbicide effects on little bluestem included visual ratings of foliar injury, as well as inflorescence with supporting culm height and yield measurements. Foliar injury ratings were made on June 30 and July 27, 2021, and June 21 and July 22, 2022 with 0 indicating no injury and 10 representing complete desiccation of foliage. Culm/inflorescence height was assessed on September 15, 2021 and September 1, 2022 by measuring the tallest inflorescence with supporting culm in the centers of 10 plants in each plot. Yields were determined by harvesting all culms/inflorescences above the leaf canopy in each plot on September 25, 2021 and September 15, 2022 and weighing immediately after harvest. All data were subjected to analysis of variance using PROC MIXED in SAS version 9.3, and means were separated using Fisher's protected least significant difference test at <i>α</i> = 0.05.</p><p>Sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments caused noticeable injury on little bluestem foliage on all rating dates in 2021 and 2022 (Tables 1 & 2). Fenoxaprop produced higher foliar injury ratings than the control only on June 30, 2021, and injury symptoms were minor (reddening of leaf tips). Injury ratings for the sethoxydim treatment were higher than all other treatments on June 30, 2021 and June 21, 2022. However, by July 27, 2021, no differences in foliar injury were observed among sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments, and injury appeared as moderate to severe foliar desiccation. On July 22, 2022, the sethoxydim treatment produced a higher injury rating than fluazifop, and the quizalofop injury rating did not differ from sethoxydim and fluazifop treatments.</p><p>All herbicide treatments reduced culm/inflorescence heights in 2021 and 2022 when compared to controls (Tables 1 and 2). Sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments had similar effects on culms/inflorescences in 2021, reducing heights by >50% relative to the control. The fenoxaprop treatment produced height reductions intermediate between the control and the other herbicide treatments in 2021.</p><p>In 2022, sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments reduced culm/inflorescence heights by >50% compared with the control; however, the fluazifop treatment had a stronger effect on height reduction than quizalofop. As in 2021, the 2022 fenoxaprop treatment resulted in height reductions intermediate between the control and the other herbicide treatments.</p><p>All herbicide treatments produced lower culm/inflorescence yields compared to the controls in 2021 and 2022 (Tables 1 and 2). In 2021, yields were reduced by >50% for all herbicide treatments relative to the control, with sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments showing the greatest reductions. The fenoxaprop treatment resulted in yields that were intermediate between the control and sethoxydim and fluazifop treatments, whereas quizalofop treatment yields were not different from those of sethoxydim, fluazifop, and fenoxaprop.</p><p>In 2022, sethoxydim and fluazifop treatments showed the greatest yield reductions, followed by quizalofop. Fenoxaprop produced higher yields than all other herbicide treatments.</p><p>Results of this study demonstrate that the ACCase-inhibiting herbicides sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop, and to a lesser degree fenoxaprop, cause foliar injury and inhibit culm/inflorescence development of little bluestem. Differences in foliar injury, culm/inflorescence heights, and yield means between years could have been due to higher rainfall amounts in 2021 compared with 2022, as well as subtle variation in soil conditions and other factors between experiment sites. In most cases, sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop injured and stunted little bluestem plants to a greater degree than fenoxaprop. These findings are similar to those of Patton et al. (<span>2021</span>) in which sethoxydim caused >30% injury to little bluestem plants. Practitioners should be aware that applications of the ACCase-inhibiting herbicides sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop can be detrimental to little bluestem when used to control grass weeds in mixed little bluestem/fine fescue rough.</p><p><b>Peter Landschoot</b>: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft.</p><p>The author declares no conflict of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20236\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
小蓝茎[Schizachyrium scopearium(Michx.)Nash]是一种温暖季节的多年生草本植物,有时在高尔夫球场上不常修剪的粗糙区域种植细羊茅(Festuca spp.),通常被称为归化或原生草地和最小修剪粗糙区域。这种本地物种在夏末和秋季经常因其美观的红金色茎和花序而被使用。在宾夕法尼亚州,多年生和一年生杂草入侵细羊茅/小蓝茎粗茅,高尔夫球场管理人员偶尔会使用出苗后除草剂作为控制选择(Landschoot,2018)。ACC酶抑制剂可控制多种杂草,但相对较少的研究检测这些除草剂对小蓝茎的影响(Patton et al.,2021)。本研究的目的是评估小蓝茎对四种ACC酶抑制剂的耐受性:芬诺沙普、氟嗪福普、喹唑洛普和sethoxydim。实验于2021年和2022年在宾夕法尼亚州大学公园的景观管理研究中心的邻近地区进行。这两项实验都是在一个八年生的未灌溉和未施肥的强匍匐红羊茅(Festuca rubra ssp.rubra Gaudin)“石榴石”和小蓝茎“Ft。Indiantown Gap PA Ecotype’(Ernst Conservation Seed)。在应用治疗时,实验区域的小蓝茎视觉覆盖率约为50-60%。该林分每年10月修剪一次,修剪高度为5英寸。实验场地的土壤为Hagerstown粉质亚粘土(细、混合、中、典型Hapludalf),pH为6.4,38 mg/kg Mehlich-3 P和186 mg/kg Mehlch-3 K。除草剂处理包括含0.25%v/v非离子表面活性剂(Lesco 90/10 Nonionic表面活性剂;Lesco股份有限公司)的28 fl oz产品/英亩的芬诺沙普(Acclaim Extra,0.57 lb芬诺沙普/加仑;Bayer Environmental Science);sethoxydim(Segment II,1.5磅sethoxydim/gal;BASF),16液盎司产品/英亩,甲基化籽油1.5品脱/英亩(Lesco甲基化籽油;Lesco股份有限公司);fluazifop(Fusilade II T/O,2 lb fluazifop/gal;Syngenta Crop Protection LLC),16 fl oz产品/英亩,含0.25%v/v非离子表面活性剂;和具有0.25%v/v非离子表面活性剂的12 fl oz产品/英亩的喹唑洛福(Assure II,0.88磅喹唑洛佛/加仑;Amvac Chemical Corp.)。在每个实验中包括一个未处理的对照。除草剂处理率基于控制细羊茅杂草的最大产品标签率。所有治疗分别于2021年6月17日和2022年6月8日进行一次。应用日期与宾夕法尼亚州中部控制杂草的首选时间一致。2021年和2022年评估期间的总降水量分别为19.7英寸和9.7英寸。所有除草剂处理都是使用背包式喷雾器进行的,该喷雾器配备有装有9504E平风扇喷嘴(TeeJet Technologies)的吊杆,压力为40磅/平方英寸,水量为87加仑/英亩。实验设计是一个随机的完全组,每次治疗重复三次。地块面积为30平方英尺。评估除草剂对小蓝茎的影响的标准包括叶片损伤的视觉评级,以及具有支撑茎高和产量测量的花序。2021年6月30日和7月27日以及2022年6月21日和7日22日进行了叶片损伤评级,0表示没有损伤,10表示叶片完全干燥。2021年9月15日和2022年9月1日,通过测量每个地块10株植物中心最高的花序和支撑茎来评估茎/花序高度。产量是通过在2021年9月25日和2022年9月15日收获每个地块叶冠上方的所有秆/花序并在收获后立即称重来确定的。在SAS 9.3版中,使用PROC-MIXED对所有数据进行方差分析,并在α=0.05时使用Fisher保护的最小显著差异检验对平均值进行分离。在2021年和2022年的所有评级日期,乙氧基丁、氟嗪福普和喹唑洛普处理对小蓝茎叶造成了明显伤害(表1和表2)。仅在2021年6月30日,芬太尼产生的叶片损伤等级高于对照,损伤症状轻微(叶尖变红)。2021年6月30日和2022年6月21日,司他西丁治疗的损伤评级高于所有其他治疗。然而,到2021年7月27日,在sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop处理之间,没有观察到叶片损伤的差异,并且损伤表现为中度至重度叶片干燥。2022年7月22日,sethoxydim治疗产生的损伤评级高于氟嗪福普,喹唑洛普的损伤评级与sethoxydim和氟嗪福普治疗没有差异。与对照组相比,2021年和2022年,所有除草剂处理都降低了秆/花序高度(表1和表2)。 2021年,Sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop处理对秆/花序具有相似的效果,使高度降低>;相对于对照为50%。2021年,非诺沙普处理的高度降低介于对照和其他除草剂处理之间。2022年,sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop处理的茎/花序高度降低了>;与对照组相比50%;然而,氟嗪福普治疗对身高的降低作用比喹唑洛普更强。与2021年一样,2022年的芬诺沙普处理导致了介于对照和其他除草剂处理之间的高度降低。与2021年和2022年的对照相比,所有除草剂处理的茎秆/花序产量都较低(表1和表2)。2021年,收益率下降了>;相对于对照,所有除草剂处理的降幅为50%,其中sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop处理的降幅最大。芬诺沙普处理产生的产量介于对照和sethoxydim和fluazifop处理之间,而喹唑洛普处理的产量与sethoxydim、fluazifo普和芬诺沙普无差异。2022年,sethoxydim和fluazifop处理的减产幅度最大,其次是quizalofop。芬诺沙普的产量高于所有其他除草剂处理。本研究结果表明,抑制ACC酶的除草剂sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop,以及较小程度的fenoxprop,会引起小叶损伤,并抑制小蓝茎的茎/花序发育。与2022年相比,2021年的降雨量更高,以及试验地点之间土壤条件和其他因素的细微变化,可能是各年份叶片损伤、茎秆/花序高度和产量平均值的差异。在大多数情况下,sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop对小蓝茎植物的伤害和发育迟缓程度高于非诺沙普。这些发现与Patton等人。(2021)其中sethoxydim导致>;对小蓝茎植物造成30%的伤害。从业者应该意识到,当用于控制小蓝茎/细羊茅混合区的杂草时,应用抑制ACC酶的除草剂sethoxydim、fluazifop和quizalofop可能对小蓝茎有害。Peter Landschool:概念化、数据管理、形式分析、资金获取、调查、方法论、项目管理、写作——初稿。提交人声明没有利益冲突。
Tolerance of little bluestem to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in Pennsylvania
Little bluestem [Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash.] is a warm-season perennial grass that is sometimes planted with fine fescues (Festuca spp.) in infrequently mowed rough areas on golf courses, commonly referred to as naturalized or native grass areas and minimal-mow rough. This native species is often used for its aesthetically pleasing reddish-gold culms and inflorescences during late summer and fall.
In Pennsylvania, perennial and annual grass weeds invade fine fescue/little bluestem rough, and golf course managers occasionally use postemergence herbicides as control options (Landschoot, 2018). ACCase-inhibiting herbicides control a variety of grass weeds, but relatively few studies have examined the effects of these herbicides on little bluestem (Patton et al., 2021).
The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of little bluestem to four ACCase-inhibiting herbicides: fenoxaprop, fluazifop, quizalofop, and sethoxydim. Experiments were conducted in 2021 and 2022 in adjacent areas at the Landscape Management Research Center in University Park, PA. Both experiments were performed in an eight-year-old non-irrigated and non-fertilized stand of strong creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra ssp. rubra Gaudin) ‘Garnet’ and little bluestem ‘Ft. Indiantown Gap-PA Ecotype’ (Ernst Conservation Seed). Little bluestem visual cover in the experiment areas at the time of treatment applications was approximately 50-60%. The stand was mowed once per year in October at 5 inches. Soil at the experiment site is a Hagerstown silt loam (fine, mixed, mesic, Typic Hapludalf), with a pH of 6.4, 38 mg/kg Mehlich-3 P, and 186 mg/kg Mehlich-3 K.
Herbicide treatments included fenoxaprop (Acclaim Extra, 0.57 lb fenoxaprop/gal; Bayer Environmental Science) at 28 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant (Lesco 90/10 Nonionic Surfactant; Lesco Inc.); sethoxydim (Segment II, 1.5 lb sethoxydim/gal; BASF) at 16 fl oz product/acre with methylated seed oil at 1.5 pints/acre (Lesco Methylated Seed Oil; Lesco Inc.); fluazifop (Fusilade II T/O, 2 lb fluazifop/gal; Syngenta Crop Protection LLC) at 16 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant; and quizalofop (Assure II, 0.88 lb quizalofop/gal; Amvac Chemical Corp.) at 12 fl oz product/acre with 0.25% v/v non-ionic surfactant. A non-treated control was included in each experiment. Herbicide treatment rates were based on maximum product label rates for control of grass weeds in fine fescue. All treatments were applied once on June 17, 2021, and June 8, 2022. Application dates coincide with preferred timing for control of grass weeds in central Pennsylvania. Total precipitation during the 2021 and 2022 evaluation periods was 19.7 and 9.7 inches, respectively.
All herbicide treatments were applied using a backpack sprayer equipped with a boom fitted with a 9504E flat fan nozzle (TeeJet Technologies) at 40 psi with a water volume of 87 gal/acre. The experimental design was a randomized complete block, and each treatment was replicated three times. Plot size was 30 ft2. Criteria for evaluating herbicide effects on little bluestem included visual ratings of foliar injury, as well as inflorescence with supporting culm height and yield measurements. Foliar injury ratings were made on June 30 and July 27, 2021, and June 21 and July 22, 2022 with 0 indicating no injury and 10 representing complete desiccation of foliage. Culm/inflorescence height was assessed on September 15, 2021 and September 1, 2022 by measuring the tallest inflorescence with supporting culm in the centers of 10 plants in each plot. Yields were determined by harvesting all culms/inflorescences above the leaf canopy in each plot on September 25, 2021 and September 15, 2022 and weighing immediately after harvest. All data were subjected to analysis of variance using PROC MIXED in SAS version 9.3, and means were separated using Fisher's protected least significant difference test at α = 0.05.
Sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments caused noticeable injury on little bluestem foliage on all rating dates in 2021 and 2022 (Tables 1 & 2). Fenoxaprop produced higher foliar injury ratings than the control only on June 30, 2021, and injury symptoms were minor (reddening of leaf tips). Injury ratings for the sethoxydim treatment were higher than all other treatments on June 30, 2021 and June 21, 2022. However, by July 27, 2021, no differences in foliar injury were observed among sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments, and injury appeared as moderate to severe foliar desiccation. On July 22, 2022, the sethoxydim treatment produced a higher injury rating than fluazifop, and the quizalofop injury rating did not differ from sethoxydim and fluazifop treatments.
All herbicide treatments reduced culm/inflorescence heights in 2021 and 2022 when compared to controls (Tables 1 and 2). Sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments had similar effects on culms/inflorescences in 2021, reducing heights by >50% relative to the control. The fenoxaprop treatment produced height reductions intermediate between the control and the other herbicide treatments in 2021.
In 2022, sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments reduced culm/inflorescence heights by >50% compared with the control; however, the fluazifop treatment had a stronger effect on height reduction than quizalofop. As in 2021, the 2022 fenoxaprop treatment resulted in height reductions intermediate between the control and the other herbicide treatments.
All herbicide treatments produced lower culm/inflorescence yields compared to the controls in 2021 and 2022 (Tables 1 and 2). In 2021, yields were reduced by >50% for all herbicide treatments relative to the control, with sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop treatments showing the greatest reductions. The fenoxaprop treatment resulted in yields that were intermediate between the control and sethoxydim and fluazifop treatments, whereas quizalofop treatment yields were not different from those of sethoxydim, fluazifop, and fenoxaprop.
In 2022, sethoxydim and fluazifop treatments showed the greatest yield reductions, followed by quizalofop. Fenoxaprop produced higher yields than all other herbicide treatments.
Results of this study demonstrate that the ACCase-inhibiting herbicides sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop, and to a lesser degree fenoxaprop, cause foliar injury and inhibit culm/inflorescence development of little bluestem. Differences in foliar injury, culm/inflorescence heights, and yield means between years could have been due to higher rainfall amounts in 2021 compared with 2022, as well as subtle variation in soil conditions and other factors between experiment sites. In most cases, sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop injured and stunted little bluestem plants to a greater degree than fenoxaprop. These findings are similar to those of Patton et al. (2021) in which sethoxydim caused >30% injury to little bluestem plants. Practitioners should be aware that applications of the ACCase-inhibiting herbicides sethoxydim, fluazifop, and quizalofop can be detrimental to little bluestem when used to control grass weeds in mixed little bluestem/fine fescue rough.
Peter Landschoot: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft.