了解不会死亡的“僵尸细胞”

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Cytopathology Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1002/cncy.22765
Bryn Nelson PhD, William Faquin MD, PhD
{"title":"了解不会死亡的“僵尸细胞”","authors":"Bryn Nelson PhD,&nbsp;William Faquin MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Here is a line you do not hear every day in cancer research: How can we control that zombie?</p><p>In response to various forms of stress after birth, such as cancer, human cells can shift into a defensive crouch called senescence, which is marked by sharply reduced activity. In this altered state, the cells stop dividing, grow in size, become somewhat disorganized, and start pumping out an array of functionally diverse factors. Much like zombies, they also refuse to die easily.</p><p>As researchers are finding, these dynamic but poorly understood “zombie cells,” as they have been dubbed, are full of contradictions. In one form, they can hold some cancers at bay for years. A premalignant colorectal polyp, for example, can be composed of a clump of senescent cells that remain relatively stable over time. Certain oncogenes, however, can thwart the defense by reanimating the cells and forcing them to resume their uncontrolled replication.</p><p>As an alternative to another cancer defense known as programmed cell death, or apoptosis, senescence is far less predictable. “Apoptosis is more like live or die; it’s binary, right? But senescence is nothing like it,” says Masashi Narita, MD, PhD, a professor of senobiology at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. “It’s a progressive and a heterogeneous phenotype, so it’s very difficult to say [whether] senescence is a good thing or a bad thing.”</p><p>Depending on the context, it may be both. In April 2023, at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Dr Narita and other experts spoke at a special session about senescent cells’ “double-edged sword.” Senescent cells induced by oncogenes such as MYC do not die easily, Dr Narita notes, in part because they are resistant to apoptosis. That transition, in other words, undermines another means of cellular defense. The early stages of the slowdown can also increase plasticity in a way that promotes cancer development through other mechanisms.</p><p>Some cancer interventions yield therapy-induced senescence, only to be undone by a mechanism called senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). As part of SASP, cells release a stew of factors, including proinflammatory proteins that can promote tumorigenesis. Conversely, interventions such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy hinge on cancer’s hallmark of rapidly dividing cells; this means that senescence can limit the therapy’s effectiveness.</p><p>Despite the many complexities, or perhaps because of them, the field of cancer-associated senescence is booming. Ricardo Iván Martínez Zamudio, PhD, an assistant professor of pharmacology at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and a research member of the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey in New Brunswick, recalls that the phenomenon was once labeled a cell culture artifact with no medical relevance. “But it’s just exploding! There are now more and more people interested in senescence,” he says.</p><p>A quarter-century ago, researchers found that the abnormally fast replication of cancerous cells brought about by certain oncogenes can trigger a senescence slowdown. During that seeming lull, however, the cells can display a dynamic range of behaviors: Some encourage their own removal by immune cells, whereas others seem to discourage that degradation and promote cancer and other age-related diseases. Dr Martínez Zamudio believes that the transitional state and its SASP mechanism may give the stressed cells a chance to assess their surroundings and, if possible, shift back to a seminormal or at least more stable existence. As a side effect of that potential quest for normalcy, however, some of the SASP factors can encourage mitosis and thereby drive the return of cancer cell proliferation.</p><p>In a recent study, Dr Martínez Zamudio showed how low-activity senescent cells could be revived in colorectal cancer and thus shed new light on one way in which malignancies can exploit the defense system.<span><sup>1</sup></span> First working in human fibroblast cells overexpressing the <i>RAS</i> oncogene, he and his colleagues found that cell senescence triggers a loss of regulation by a family of related transcription factors that would otherwise control which genes are turned on and off. “What we found is that the AP1 family of transcription factors in our model system seems to be very critical to mediate both the entry and the exit out of senescence,” he says.</p><p>AP1 transcription factors, in conjunction with another transcription factor called POU2F2, drive the senescent cells out of their slumber by reactivating cell cycle, reprogramming, and inflammation-promoting genes. In colorectal cancer cells, the researchers saw the same process.</p><p>More directly, if further research continues to implicate <i>POU2F2</i> in the escape of colorectal cancer cells from senescence, it could prompt a search for drugs that bind to and disable the protein and thus prevent the return of cell proliferation. “With more validation in a more relevant system and in some tissue samples, I think <i>POU2F2</i> could be a target,” he says, at least for a subset of oncogene-associated cancers. Dr Martínez Zamudio cautions, however, that the complexity of SASP could limit broader applicability of the research findings. “It’s such a complicated thing. The state of the senescent cell, it really depends on what the initial trigger was, and on the cell type,” he says. “I don’t think there’s going to be a Holy Grail drug to kill senescent cells.”</p><p>Despite the challenges, other groups are starting to untangle separate parts of the process. In their own line of research, Dr Narita and his colleagues are seeking to clarify how the <i>RAS</i> oncogene can trigger cell senescence. Initially, critics suggested that the phenomenon might be a laboratory artifact until a series of studies detected it in vivo. In their research, Dr Narita and his team are hoping to quantify the approximate physiological dose of RAS required to induce senescence.</p><p>On the basis of their results and those of other laboratories, Dr Narita speculates that cells carrying a slightly higher than normal level of oncogenic RAS might receive a small survival benefit. Over time, cells with higher levels of the oncogene could start to dominate. At some point, however, that level would exceed a threshold; the cellular stress would either trigger the start of senescence or cause the cells to become cancerous. “So, we are proposing that oncogenic senescence has to be seen as a spectrum, and can then be an integral part of tumor evolution,” he says.</p><p>As with cellular differentiation, he says, senescence may yield a vastly different gene expression profile over time. The plasticity of early senescence suggests that a cell in that transitional state might yet become cancerous. “If it’s very deep senescence, it may not be able to come back. We don’t know; no one knows,” says Dr Narita. One possibility, which he hopes to test, is that an epigenetic mechanism altering the DNA’s chromatin structure may eventually cause a senescent cell to reach a point of no return.</p><p>Depending on what scientists discover about the progressive stages of senescence, they may understand better where the pressure points are and whether they can be realistically targeted. “There’s a huge impetus on developing drugs that can either eliminate senescent cells or modulate the senescent states,” Dr Martínez Zamudio says. Another big priority, he says, is to generate a comprehensive catalog of what senescence means in different contexts. In his own laboratory, he hopes to analyze various cell types and senescence inducers to see if there is any commonality of factors driving the phenotype. On the basis of some of his own research, he believes that the AP1 family of transcription factors may yet oversee some important general mechanisms.</p><p>Dr Narita says that the field of research is entering a much more difficult phase, however: Unlike cellular differentiation during development, he sees the senescence process as being much more stochastic, or less predictable. Like Dr Martínez Zamudio, however, he is hopeful that some larger patterns might yet emerge. If so, the field may be on its way toward controlling a powerful, dangerous, and mercurial cellular zombie.</p>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncy.22765","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the “zombie cells” that won’t die\",\"authors\":\"Bryn Nelson PhD,&nbsp;William Faquin MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncy.22765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Here is a line you do not hear every day in cancer research: How can we control that zombie?</p><p>In response to various forms of stress after birth, such as cancer, human cells can shift into a defensive crouch called senescence, which is marked by sharply reduced activity. In this altered state, the cells stop dividing, grow in size, become somewhat disorganized, and start pumping out an array of functionally diverse factors. Much like zombies, they also refuse to die easily.</p><p>As researchers are finding, these dynamic but poorly understood “zombie cells,” as they have been dubbed, are full of contradictions. In one form, they can hold some cancers at bay for years. A premalignant colorectal polyp, for example, can be composed of a clump of senescent cells that remain relatively stable over time. Certain oncogenes, however, can thwart the defense by reanimating the cells and forcing them to resume their uncontrolled replication.</p><p>As an alternative to another cancer defense known as programmed cell death, or apoptosis, senescence is far less predictable. “Apoptosis is more like live or die; it’s binary, right? But senescence is nothing like it,” says Masashi Narita, MD, PhD, a professor of senobiology at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. “It’s a progressive and a heterogeneous phenotype, so it’s very difficult to say [whether] senescence is a good thing or a bad thing.”</p><p>Depending on the context, it may be both. In April 2023, at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Dr Narita and other experts spoke at a special session about senescent cells’ “double-edged sword.” Senescent cells induced by oncogenes such as MYC do not die easily, Dr Narita notes, in part because they are resistant to apoptosis. That transition, in other words, undermines another means of cellular defense. The early stages of the slowdown can also increase plasticity in a way that promotes cancer development through other mechanisms.</p><p>Some cancer interventions yield therapy-induced senescence, only to be undone by a mechanism called senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). As part of SASP, cells release a stew of factors, including proinflammatory proteins that can promote tumorigenesis. Conversely, interventions such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy hinge on cancer’s hallmark of rapidly dividing cells; this means that senescence can limit the therapy’s effectiveness.</p><p>Despite the many complexities, or perhaps because of them, the field of cancer-associated senescence is booming. Ricardo Iván Martínez Zamudio, PhD, an assistant professor of pharmacology at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and a research member of the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey in New Brunswick, recalls that the phenomenon was once labeled a cell culture artifact with no medical relevance. “But it’s just exploding! There are now more and more people interested in senescence,” he says.</p><p>A quarter-century ago, researchers found that the abnormally fast replication of cancerous cells brought about by certain oncogenes can trigger a senescence slowdown. During that seeming lull, however, the cells can display a dynamic range of behaviors: Some encourage their own removal by immune cells, whereas others seem to discourage that degradation and promote cancer and other age-related diseases. Dr Martínez Zamudio believes that the transitional state and its SASP mechanism may give the stressed cells a chance to assess their surroundings and, if possible, shift back to a seminormal or at least more stable existence. As a side effect of that potential quest for normalcy, however, some of the SASP factors can encourage mitosis and thereby drive the return of cancer cell proliferation.</p><p>In a recent study, Dr Martínez Zamudio showed how low-activity senescent cells could be revived in colorectal cancer and thus shed new light on one way in which malignancies can exploit the defense system.<span><sup>1</sup></span> First working in human fibroblast cells overexpressing the <i>RAS</i> oncogene, he and his colleagues found that cell senescence triggers a loss of regulation by a family of related transcription factors that would otherwise control which genes are turned on and off. “What we found is that the AP1 family of transcription factors in our model system seems to be very critical to mediate both the entry and the exit out of senescence,” he says.</p><p>AP1 transcription factors, in conjunction with another transcription factor called POU2F2, drive the senescent cells out of their slumber by reactivating cell cycle, reprogramming, and inflammation-promoting genes. In colorectal cancer cells, the researchers saw the same process.</p><p>More directly, if further research continues to implicate <i>POU2F2</i> in the escape of colorectal cancer cells from senescence, it could prompt a search for drugs that bind to and disable the protein and thus prevent the return of cell proliferation. “With more validation in a more relevant system and in some tissue samples, I think <i>POU2F2</i> could be a target,” he says, at least for a subset of oncogene-associated cancers. Dr Martínez Zamudio cautions, however, that the complexity of SASP could limit broader applicability of the research findings. “It’s such a complicated thing. The state of the senescent cell, it really depends on what the initial trigger was, and on the cell type,” he says. “I don’t think there’s going to be a Holy Grail drug to kill senescent cells.”</p><p>Despite the challenges, other groups are starting to untangle separate parts of the process. In their own line of research, Dr Narita and his colleagues are seeking to clarify how the <i>RAS</i> oncogene can trigger cell senescence. Initially, critics suggested that the phenomenon might be a laboratory artifact until a series of studies detected it in vivo. In their research, Dr Narita and his team are hoping to quantify the approximate physiological dose of RAS required to induce senescence.</p><p>On the basis of their results and those of other laboratories, Dr Narita speculates that cells carrying a slightly higher than normal level of oncogenic RAS might receive a small survival benefit. Over time, cells with higher levels of the oncogene could start to dominate. At some point, however, that level would exceed a threshold; the cellular stress would either trigger the start of senescence or cause the cells to become cancerous. “So, we are proposing that oncogenic senescence has to be seen as a spectrum, and can then be an integral part of tumor evolution,” he says.</p><p>As with cellular differentiation, he says, senescence may yield a vastly different gene expression profile over time. The plasticity of early senescence suggests that a cell in that transitional state might yet become cancerous. “If it’s very deep senescence, it may not be able to come back. We don’t know; no one knows,” says Dr Narita. One possibility, which he hopes to test, is that an epigenetic mechanism altering the DNA’s chromatin structure may eventually cause a senescent cell to reach a point of no return.</p><p>Depending on what scientists discover about the progressive stages of senescence, they may understand better where the pressure points are and whether they can be realistically targeted. “There’s a huge impetus on developing drugs that can either eliminate senescent cells or modulate the senescent states,” Dr Martínez Zamudio says. Another big priority, he says, is to generate a comprehensive catalog of what senescence means in different contexts. In his own laboratory, he hopes to analyze various cell types and senescence inducers to see if there is any commonality of factors driving the phenotype. On the basis of some of his own research, he believes that the AP1 family of transcription factors may yet oversee some important general mechanisms.</p><p>Dr Narita says that the field of research is entering a much more difficult phase, however: Unlike cellular differentiation during development, he sees the senescence process as being much more stochastic, or less predictable. Like Dr Martínez Zamudio, however, he is hopeful that some larger patterns might yet emerge. If so, the field may be on its way toward controlling a powerful, dangerous, and mercurial cellular zombie.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Cytopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncy.22765\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncy.22765\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncy.22765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在癌症研究中,你每天都听不到这样一句话:我们如何控制僵尸?为了应对出生后的各种形式的压力,如癌症,人类细胞可以转变为一种称为衰老的防御状态,其特征是活动急剧减少。在这种改变的状态下,细胞停止分裂,体积增大,变得有些无序,并开始分泌一系列功能多样的因子。就像僵尸一样,他们也拒绝轻易死去。正如研究人员所发现的那样,这些动态但鲜为人知的“僵尸细胞”充满了矛盾。在一种形式中,它们可以抑制一些癌症数年。例如,癌前结肠息肉可以由一团随着时间的推移保持相对稳定的衰老细胞组成。然而,某些致癌基因可以通过使细胞复活并迫使它们恢复不受控制的复制来阻止防御。作为另一种被称为程序性细胞死亡或凋亡的癌症防御的替代方案,衰老远不可预测。英国剑桥大学senobiology教授、医学博士Masashi Narita说:“细胞凋亡更像是生或死;它是二元的,对吧?但衰老一点也不像。”。“这是一种进行性和异质性表型,所以很难说衰老是好事还是坏事。”根据具体情况,两者都可能。2023年4月,在美国癌症研究协会年会上,成田博士和其他专家在一次特别会议上谈到了衰老细胞的“双刃剑”。成田博士指出,由MYC等致癌基因诱导的衰老细胞不容易死亡,部分原因是它们对细胞凋亡具有抵抗力。换句话说,这种转变破坏了另一种细胞防御手段。减缓的早期阶段也可以增加可塑性,通过其他机制促进癌症的发展。一些癌症干预产生了治疗诱导的衰老,但被称为衰老相关分泌表型(SASP)的机制所破坏。作为SASP的一部分,细胞会释放一系列因子,包括可以促进肿瘤发生的促炎蛋白。相反,嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗等干预措施取决于癌症细胞快速分裂的标志;这意味着衰老会限制治疗的有效性。尽管存在许多复杂性,或者可能正是因为这些复杂性,癌症相关衰老领域正在蓬勃发展。罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊医学院药理学助理教授、新不伦瑞克新泽西州罗格斯癌症研究所研究成员Ricardo Iván Martínez Zamudio博士回忆说,这种现象曾被标记为与医学无关的细胞培养产物。“但它正在爆炸!现在有越来越多的人对衰老感兴趣,”他说。四分之一个世纪前,研究人员发现,某些致癌基因引起的癌细胞异常快速复制会引发衰老减缓。然而,在这种看似平静的时期,这些细胞可以表现出一系列动态的行为:一些细胞鼓励免疫细胞自行清除,而另一些细胞似乎阻止了这种降解,并促进了癌症和其他与年龄相关的疾病。Martínez Zamudio博士认为,过渡状态及其SASP机制可能会让压力细胞有机会评估周围环境,并在可能的情况下,恢复到半正常状态或至少更稳定的状态。然而,作为寻求正常状态的潜在副作用,一些SASP因子可以促进有丝分裂,从而推动癌症细胞增殖的恢复。在最近的一项研究中,Martínez Zamudio博士展示了低活性衰老细胞如何在结直肠癌癌症中复活,从而为恶性肿瘤利用防御系统的一种方式提供了新的线索,他和他的同事们发现,细胞衰老会引发一系列相关转录因子的调控缺失,而这些转录因子原本可以控制哪些基因的开启和关闭。“我们发现,我们模型系统中的AP1转录因子家族似乎对介导衰老的进入和退出至关重要,”他说。AP1转录因子与另一种名为POU2F2的转录因子结合,通过重新激活细胞周期、重新编程和炎症促进基因,将衰老细胞从睡眠中赶走。在癌症细胞中,研究人员看到了同样的过程。更直接地说,如果进一步的研究继续表明POU2F2与结直肠癌癌症细胞衰老的逃避有关,这可能会促使人们寻找与该蛋白结合并使其失效的药物,从而阻止细胞增殖的恢复。 他说:“随着在一个更相关的系统和一些组织样本中进行更多的验证,我认为POU2F2可能成为一个靶点。”至少对于致癌基因相关癌症的一个子集来说是这样。然而,Martínez Zamudio博士警告说,SASP的复杂性可能会限制研究结果的更广泛适用性。他说:“这是一件非常复杂的事情。衰老细胞的状态实际上取决于最初的触发因素和细胞类型。”。“我不认为会有一种圣杯般的药物来杀死衰老细胞。”尽管面临挑战,其他小组正在开始解开这个过程的各个部分。在他们自己的研究领域,成田博士和他的同事们正在试图阐明RAS癌基因是如何引发细胞衰老的。最初,批评者认为这种现象可能是实验室的人工产物,直到一系列研究在体内检测到它。在他们的研究中,成田博士和他的团队希望量化诱导衰老所需的RAS的大致生理剂量。根据他们和其他实验室的结果,成田博士推测,携带略高于正常致癌RAS水平的细胞可能会获得少量的生存益处。随着时间的推移,癌基因水平较高的细胞可能开始占据主导地位。然而,在某个时刻,这一水平将超过一个阈值;细胞应激会触发衰老的开始或导致细胞癌变。“因此,我们提出致癌衰老必须被视为一个光谱,然后才能成为肿瘤进化的一个组成部分,”他说。他说,与细胞分化一样,随着时间的推移,衰老可能会产生截然不同的基因表达谱。早期衰老的可塑性表明,处于这种过渡状态的细胞可能会癌变。成田博士说:“如果它衰老得很深,它可能就回不来了。我们不知道,没有人知道。”。他希望测试的一种可能性是,改变DNA染色质结构的表观遗传学机制可能最终导致衰老细胞达到不可逆转的地步。根据科学家对衰老进行阶段的发现,他们可能会更好地了解压力点在哪里,以及它们是否可以成为现实的目标。Martínez Zamudio博士说:“开发能够消除衰老细胞或调节衰老状态的药物有着巨大的推动力。”。他说,另一个重要的优先事项是生成一个关于衰老在不同情况下意味着什么的综合目录。在他自己的实验室里,他希望分析各种细胞类型和衰老诱导剂,看看驱动表型的因素是否有任何共性。根据他自己的一些研究,他认为AP1转录因子家族可能会监督一些重要的一般机制。成田博士说,研究领域正进入一个更加困难的阶段:然而,与发育过程中的细胞分化不同,他认为衰老过程更随机,或更不可预测。然而,就像Martínez Zamudio博士一样,他希望一些更大的模式可能会出现。如果是这样的话,这个领域可能正在朝着控制一个强大、危险、善变的细胞僵尸的方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the “zombie cells” that won’t die

Here is a line you do not hear every day in cancer research: How can we control that zombie?

In response to various forms of stress after birth, such as cancer, human cells can shift into a defensive crouch called senescence, which is marked by sharply reduced activity. In this altered state, the cells stop dividing, grow in size, become somewhat disorganized, and start pumping out an array of functionally diverse factors. Much like zombies, they also refuse to die easily.

As researchers are finding, these dynamic but poorly understood “zombie cells,” as they have been dubbed, are full of contradictions. In one form, they can hold some cancers at bay for years. A premalignant colorectal polyp, for example, can be composed of a clump of senescent cells that remain relatively stable over time. Certain oncogenes, however, can thwart the defense by reanimating the cells and forcing them to resume their uncontrolled replication.

As an alternative to another cancer defense known as programmed cell death, or apoptosis, senescence is far less predictable. “Apoptosis is more like live or die; it’s binary, right? But senescence is nothing like it,” says Masashi Narita, MD, PhD, a professor of senobiology at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. “It’s a progressive and a heterogeneous phenotype, so it’s very difficult to say [whether] senescence is a good thing or a bad thing.”

Depending on the context, it may be both. In April 2023, at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Dr Narita and other experts spoke at a special session about senescent cells’ “double-edged sword.” Senescent cells induced by oncogenes such as MYC do not die easily, Dr Narita notes, in part because they are resistant to apoptosis. That transition, in other words, undermines another means of cellular defense. The early stages of the slowdown can also increase plasticity in a way that promotes cancer development through other mechanisms.

Some cancer interventions yield therapy-induced senescence, only to be undone by a mechanism called senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). As part of SASP, cells release a stew of factors, including proinflammatory proteins that can promote tumorigenesis. Conversely, interventions such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy hinge on cancer’s hallmark of rapidly dividing cells; this means that senescence can limit the therapy’s effectiveness.

Despite the many complexities, or perhaps because of them, the field of cancer-associated senescence is booming. Ricardo Iván Martínez Zamudio, PhD, an assistant professor of pharmacology at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and a research member of the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey in New Brunswick, recalls that the phenomenon was once labeled a cell culture artifact with no medical relevance. “But it’s just exploding! There are now more and more people interested in senescence,” he says.

A quarter-century ago, researchers found that the abnormally fast replication of cancerous cells brought about by certain oncogenes can trigger a senescence slowdown. During that seeming lull, however, the cells can display a dynamic range of behaviors: Some encourage their own removal by immune cells, whereas others seem to discourage that degradation and promote cancer and other age-related diseases. Dr Martínez Zamudio believes that the transitional state and its SASP mechanism may give the stressed cells a chance to assess their surroundings and, if possible, shift back to a seminormal or at least more stable existence. As a side effect of that potential quest for normalcy, however, some of the SASP factors can encourage mitosis and thereby drive the return of cancer cell proliferation.

In a recent study, Dr Martínez Zamudio showed how low-activity senescent cells could be revived in colorectal cancer and thus shed new light on one way in which malignancies can exploit the defense system.1 First working in human fibroblast cells overexpressing the RAS oncogene, he and his colleagues found that cell senescence triggers a loss of regulation by a family of related transcription factors that would otherwise control which genes are turned on and off. “What we found is that the AP1 family of transcription factors in our model system seems to be very critical to mediate both the entry and the exit out of senescence,” he says.

AP1 transcription factors, in conjunction with another transcription factor called POU2F2, drive the senescent cells out of their slumber by reactivating cell cycle, reprogramming, and inflammation-promoting genes. In colorectal cancer cells, the researchers saw the same process.

More directly, if further research continues to implicate POU2F2 in the escape of colorectal cancer cells from senescence, it could prompt a search for drugs that bind to and disable the protein and thus prevent the return of cell proliferation. “With more validation in a more relevant system and in some tissue samples, I think POU2F2 could be a target,” he says, at least for a subset of oncogene-associated cancers. Dr Martínez Zamudio cautions, however, that the complexity of SASP could limit broader applicability of the research findings. “It’s such a complicated thing. The state of the senescent cell, it really depends on what the initial trigger was, and on the cell type,” he says. “I don’t think there’s going to be a Holy Grail drug to kill senescent cells.”

Despite the challenges, other groups are starting to untangle separate parts of the process. In their own line of research, Dr Narita and his colleagues are seeking to clarify how the RAS oncogene can trigger cell senescence. Initially, critics suggested that the phenomenon might be a laboratory artifact until a series of studies detected it in vivo. In their research, Dr Narita and his team are hoping to quantify the approximate physiological dose of RAS required to induce senescence.

On the basis of their results and those of other laboratories, Dr Narita speculates that cells carrying a slightly higher than normal level of oncogenic RAS might receive a small survival benefit. Over time, cells with higher levels of the oncogene could start to dominate. At some point, however, that level would exceed a threshold; the cellular stress would either trigger the start of senescence or cause the cells to become cancerous. “So, we are proposing that oncogenic senescence has to be seen as a spectrum, and can then be an integral part of tumor evolution,” he says.

As with cellular differentiation, he says, senescence may yield a vastly different gene expression profile over time. The plasticity of early senescence suggests that a cell in that transitional state might yet become cancerous. “If it’s very deep senescence, it may not be able to come back. We don’t know; no one knows,” says Dr Narita. One possibility, which he hopes to test, is that an epigenetic mechanism altering the DNA’s chromatin structure may eventually cause a senescent cell to reach a point of no return.

Depending on what scientists discover about the progressive stages of senescence, they may understand better where the pressure points are and whether they can be realistically targeted. “There’s a huge impetus on developing drugs that can either eliminate senescent cells or modulate the senescent states,” Dr Martínez Zamudio says. Another big priority, he says, is to generate a comprehensive catalog of what senescence means in different contexts. In his own laboratory, he hopes to analyze various cell types and senescence inducers to see if there is any commonality of factors driving the phenotype. On the basis of some of his own research, he believes that the AP1 family of transcription factors may yet oversee some important general mechanisms.

Dr Narita says that the field of research is entering a much more difficult phase, however: Unlike cellular differentiation during development, he sees the senescence process as being much more stochastic, or less predictable. Like Dr Martínez Zamudio, however, he is hopeful that some larger patterns might yet emerge. If so, the field may be on its way toward controlling a powerful, dangerous, and mercurial cellular zombie.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Cytopathology
Cancer Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
17.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Cytopathology provides a unique forum for interaction and dissemination of original research and educational information relevant to the practice of cytopathology and its related oncologic disciplines. The journal strives to have a positive effect on cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and cure by the publication of high-quality content. The mission of Cancer Cytopathology is to present and inform readers of new applications, technological advances, cutting-edge research, novel applications of molecular techniques, and relevant review articles related to cytopathology.
期刊最新文献
Research and scholarly mentoring: A guide for pathology faculty and program directors. Utility and performance of cell blocks in cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Experience at two teaching hospitals. Risk of malignancy and overall survival associated with the diagnostic categories in the World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology. The Milan system atypia of undetermined significance: 5-year performance data. Cytomorphologic and molecular characterization of spindle cell carcinoid tumors of the lung.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1