GLP-1受体激动剂和SGLT2抑制剂治疗1型糖尿病的临床和安全性研究

Iskandar Idris
{"title":"GLP-1受体激动剂和SGLT2抑制剂治疗1型糖尿病的临床和安全性研究","authors":"Iskandar Idris","doi":"10.1002/doi2.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The metabolic benefits of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes are now well recognised. However, ongoing uncertainties persists regarding their use in people with type 1 diabetes mainly due to safety concerns and lack of evidence from large scale randomised clinical trials. Despite this, Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are often used off-label in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in real-world practice as adjuvant therapies to insulin to improve metabolic outcomes. A recent study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism was therefore aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RAs and sodium-glucose SGLT2is in the management of T1DM in real-world practice. Using a retrospective chart review, the investigators identified 104 patients with T1DM who ever used a GLP-1RA (76 patients) or SGLT2i (39 patients) for more than 90 days. They reported that after 1 year of therapy, GLP-1RA users had statistically significant reductions in weight (90.5 kg to 85.4 kg; <i>P</i> &lt; .001), HbA<sub>1c</sub> (7.7% to 7.3%; <i>P</i> = .007), and total daily dose of insulin (61.8 units to 41.9 units; <i>P</i> &lt; .001). SGLT2i users also experienced significant reductions in HbA<sub>1c</sub> (7.9% to 7.3%; <i>P</i> &lt; .001) and basal insulin (31.3 units to 25.6 units; <i>P</i> = .003). GLP-1RA users compared to SGLT2i users had greater reduction in weight while HbA<sub>1c</sub> reduction was comparable between the groups. Importantly, over a mean total duration of use of 29.5 months/patient for both groups, more SGLT2i users experienced diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (12.8% vs 3.9%). Discontinuation rate between the two therapies were comparable (26.9% of the time for GLP-1RA users vs 27.7% for SGLT2i users). Overall, this real world study provided evidence of metabolic benefits in patients with type 1 diabetes. However, DKA remains a clinical concern with SGLT2i use, requiring careful patient selection and monitoring, with the risk to benefit ratio of treatment evaluated at an individual level.</p>","PeriodicalId":100370,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Now","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/doi2.28","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real world study on the Clinical and Safety Outcomes With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Iskandar Idris\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/doi2.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The metabolic benefits of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes are now well recognised. However, ongoing uncertainties persists regarding their use in people with type 1 diabetes mainly due to safety concerns and lack of evidence from large scale randomised clinical trials. Despite this, Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are often used off-label in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in real-world practice as adjuvant therapies to insulin to improve metabolic outcomes. A recent study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism was therefore aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RAs and sodium-glucose SGLT2is in the management of T1DM in real-world practice. Using a retrospective chart review, the investigators identified 104 patients with T1DM who ever used a GLP-1RA (76 patients) or SGLT2i (39 patients) for more than 90 days. They reported that after 1 year of therapy, GLP-1RA users had statistically significant reductions in weight (90.5 kg to 85.4 kg; <i>P</i> &lt; .001), HbA<sub>1c</sub> (7.7% to 7.3%; <i>P</i> = .007), and total daily dose of insulin (61.8 units to 41.9 units; <i>P</i> &lt; .001). SGLT2i users also experienced significant reductions in HbA<sub>1c</sub> (7.9% to 7.3%; <i>P</i> &lt; .001) and basal insulin (31.3 units to 25.6 units; <i>P</i> = .003). GLP-1RA users compared to SGLT2i users had greater reduction in weight while HbA<sub>1c</sub> reduction was comparable between the groups. Importantly, over a mean total duration of use of 29.5 months/patient for both groups, more SGLT2i users experienced diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (12.8% vs 3.9%). Discontinuation rate between the two therapies were comparable (26.9% of the time for GLP-1RA users vs 27.7% for SGLT2i users). Overall, this real world study provided evidence of metabolic benefits in patients with type 1 diabetes. However, DKA remains a clinical concern with SGLT2i use, requiring careful patient selection and monitoring, with the risk to benefit ratio of treatment evaluated at an individual level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Now\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/doi2.28\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Now\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/doi2.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/doi2.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

GLP-1受体激动剂和SGLT2抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者的代谢益处现已得到广泛认可。然而,它们在1型糖尿病患者中的使用仍存在不确定性,主要是由于安全问题和缺乏大规模随机临床试验的证据。尽管如此,在现实生活中,胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2is)在1型糖尿病(T1DM)的治疗中经常被用作胰岛素的辅助疗法,以改善代谢结果。因此,最近发表在《临床内分泌学与代谢杂志》上的一项研究旨在确定GLP-1RA和葡萄糖钠SGLT2is在现实生活中治疗T1DM的疗效和安全性。通过回顾性图表回顾,研究人员确定了104名曾使用GLP-1RA(76名患者)或SGLT2i(39名患者)超过90年的T1DM患者 天。他们报告说,1 治疗一年后,GLP-1RA使用者的体重有统计学意义的减轻(90.5 kg至85.4 公斤P <; .001)、HbA1c(7.7%-7.3%;P=0.007)和胰岛素日总剂量(61.8 单位至41.9 单位;P <; .001)。SGLT2i使用者的HbA1c也显著降低(7.9%-7.3%;P <; .001)和基础胰岛素(31.3 单位至25.6 单位;P=0.003)。与SGLT2i使用者相比,GLP-1RA使用者的体重减轻更大,而HbA1c的减轻在两组之间具有可比性。重要的是,在29.5的平均总使用时间内 两组患者中,SGLT2i使用者出现糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的人数更多(12.8%对3.9%)。两种疗法的停药率相当(GLP-1RA使用者的停药时间为26.9%,SGLT2使用者为27.7%)。总的来说,这项现实世界的研究为1型糖尿病患者的代谢益处提供了证据。然而,DKA仍然是SGLT2i使用的临床问题,需要仔细选择和监测患者,并在个体水平上评估治疗的风险效益比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real world study on the Clinical and Safety Outcomes With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes

The metabolic benefits of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes are now well recognised. However, ongoing uncertainties persists regarding their use in people with type 1 diabetes mainly due to safety concerns and lack of evidence from large scale randomised clinical trials. Despite this, Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are often used off-label in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in real-world practice as adjuvant therapies to insulin to improve metabolic outcomes. A recent study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism was therefore aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RAs and sodium-glucose SGLT2is in the management of T1DM in real-world practice. Using a retrospective chart review, the investigators identified 104 patients with T1DM who ever used a GLP-1RA (76 patients) or SGLT2i (39 patients) for more than 90 days. They reported that after 1 year of therapy, GLP-1RA users had statistically significant reductions in weight (90.5 kg to 85.4 kg; P < .001), HbA1c (7.7% to 7.3%; P = .007), and total daily dose of insulin (61.8 units to 41.9 units; P < .001). SGLT2i users also experienced significant reductions in HbA1c (7.9% to 7.3%; P < .001) and basal insulin (31.3 units to 25.6 units; P = .003). GLP-1RA users compared to SGLT2i users had greater reduction in weight while HbA1c reduction was comparable between the groups. Importantly, over a mean total duration of use of 29.5 months/patient for both groups, more SGLT2i users experienced diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (12.8% vs 3.9%). Discontinuation rate between the two therapies were comparable (26.9% of the time for GLP-1RA users vs 27.7% for SGLT2i users). Overall, this real world study provided evidence of metabolic benefits in patients with type 1 diabetes. However, DKA remains a clinical concern with SGLT2i use, requiring careful patient selection and monitoring, with the risk to benefit ratio of treatment evaluated at an individual level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Precision medicine approach to detect obese people who are at high risk of developing diabetes Increasing excess to weight loss injection shown to save thousands of lives a year Semaglutide shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes with any forms of heart failure Real world study provided reassurance of the safety of GLP-1 therapy on mental health and suicide risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1