来自文本分析的消费者见解

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Psychology Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1002/jcpy.1383
Grant Packard, Sarah G. Moore, Jonah Berger
{"title":"来自文本分析的消费者见解","authors":"Grant Packard,&nbsp;Sarah G. Moore,&nbsp;Jonah Berger","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Language, whether spoken or written, is fundamental to the consumer experience. It is how consumers express their thoughts, articulate choices, negotiate with others, and receive information about products or services. And it is how marketers deliver persuasion attempts, make apologies, and build relationships with consumers.</p><p>Language has also long been a powerful research tool. Scholars have used content analysis methods like ethnography in interviews, observational studies, and interpretation of language-based artifacts to advance our understanding of consumer culture (e.g., Arnould &amp; Thompson, <span>2005</span>; Stern, <span>1989</span>). Research on the psychology of language has studied how people respond to a range of semantic, syntactic, and rhetorical aspects of verbal communication (Kronrod, <span>2022</span>).</p><p>But something new has emerged in the last decade or so—something that has helped foster a genuine explosion in the analysis of text in consumer research (Packard &amp; Berger, <span>2023</span>). First, language data has become more accessible. While consumers, companies, and other marketplace actors are constantly producing language, only recently has much of this content become digitized (or digitizable), making it far easier to collect and analyze. Every day, billions of consumers share attitudes and opinions online. Customer service calls, depth interviews, and Zoom meetings can be transcribed with the push of a button, and the shift from paper and pencil surveys to online data collection means open-ended participant responses are ready-made for automated text analysis. Similarly, massive online repositories of human conversations, product reviews, books, movie scripts, newspaper articles, and other cultural content provide easy ways to explore ideas in language.</p><p>Second, new tools have changed how language can be analyzed. Previously, language data could only be coded manually. Researchers, or research assistants, would read or listen to language and score it on various dimensions. While manual coding is helpful, it is often subjective and difficult to scale for both lab and field research. Manually reading and carefully evaluating just 10 conversations, online reviews, or thought listings takes a fair amount of time—and reading 1000 takes 100 times as long.</p><p>In recent years, though, psychologists and computer scientists have developed tools that allow language data to be processed and analyzed quickly and easily. Dictionaries like Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC, Tausczik &amp; Pennebaker, <span>2010</span>) allow researchers to count the presence of different words linked to psychological constructs and approaches like latent Dirichlet allocation (Blei et al., <span>2003</span>). Word embeddings (cf. Bakarov, <span>2018</span>) and large language model approaches (e.g., BERT, GPT) make it possible to measure almost any construct. And these tools are becoming more user-friendly every day.</p><p>Just like the microscope revolutionized chemistry and the telescope revolutionized astronomy, ongoing developments in automated textual analysis have allowed researchers in a variety of different domains to unlock a range of new insights from text.</p><p>This special issue presents a collection of exciting articles that showcase how text analysis can illuminate a diverse range of theoretical and substantive topics in consumer psychology. Through the set of theories explored, methods applied, and tools introduced, we hope that scholars who have just begun to explore the space, those who fear they do not have the “know how,” and even text analysis and psychology of language experts will be inspired to consider how these methods can generate new consumer insights.</p><p>Next, we offer a brief synopsis of why each of the special issue articles can help do just that. We discuss articles that combine text analysis and experiments, introduce user-friendly ways to capture constructs and apply cutting-edge methods to novel problems. We then share a brief perspective on the special issue's methodological diversity, discuss who is using text analysis today, and point toward some text analysis resources.</p><p>It is worth noting that several of the special issue authors would not necessarily be thought of as “text analysis people.” Some may have recently added the method to their toolkit. Others partnered with colleagues that brought know-how to the team. This raises an interesting question: who's using text analysis and how? To find out, we asked people on the <i>Society for Consumer Psychology</i> and <i>Association for Consumer Research</i> email lists (research professors and PhD students; <i>N</i> = 220) to answer some questions about their research methods. We did not mention text analysis to try to mitigate self-selection.</p><p>Results indicate that over two-thirds (69%) of scholars—both junior and senior—reported using automated text analysis in their research at least once, suggesting that it is indeed approaching mainstream status as a research method.</p><p>Most researchers who noted they had not used automated text analysis yet said it was primarily due to a lack of knowledge (80%). Hopefully, this special issue will help more scholars see the opportunity and ease of adding automated text analysis to their tool kit or to their research team by finding a colleague to join the effort.</p><p>The articles in the special issue and the use cases outlined in our survey highlight several ways consumer researchers can use text analysis to explore almost any topic.</p><p>First, researchers can use text analysis tools to offer richer tests of existing ideas. They may already have a particular idea in mind about a relationship between a predictor and outcome, or they may even have a sense of what the underlying process might be. Further, they may have conducted some experiments to test these ideas. Automated text analysis can provide further tests, uncover additional relationships, or provide external validity. In experimental work, for example, researchers can have participants respond to open-ended questions or write about experiences, and parse that content to assess dependent variables (Barasch &amp; Berger, <span>2014</span>; Spiller &amp; Belogolova, <span>2017</span>), mediators (Wu et al., <span>2019</span>), or alternative explanations. Similarly, researchers who have conducted carefully controlled experiments may want to test whether their effects hold in the noisy field. Online reviews (Lafreniere, Moore, &amp; Fisher, <span>2022</span>), social media posts (Lee &amp; Junqué de Fortuny, <span>2022</span>), and everything from newspaper articles and books to movie scripts and song lyrics (Packard &amp; Berger, <span>2020</span>; Toubia et al., <span>2021</span>) can provide useful testing grounds for external validity.</p><p>Second, researchers can use these approaches to help develop ideas and theories in the first place (van Osselaer &amp; Janiszewski, <span>2021</span>). Some researchers might be interested in a broad question, like what makes online content viral, or what about customer service interactions lead to greater customer satisfaction. In such situations, they may have a dependent variable in mind but are not sure which independent variable to focus on. By using automated textual analysis to measure multiple independent variables, researchers can explore which features matter most (Hodges et al., <span>2023</span>), and use that to decide where to focus before developing theory and designing subsequent experiments. Similarly, researchers can test alternative explanations by measuring and controlling for other factors that may play a role; they can use automated textual analysis to explore potential underlying processes, simultaneously testing them.</p><p>Third, researchers can use the findings of text analysis to improve their academic writing. Recent work has used natural language processing to explore how to make writing clearer and why some articles are cited more (Warren et al., <span>2021</span>); Boghrati et al., <span>2023</span>). Abstraction, technical language, and passive writing can make research difficult to understand and lead it to be cited less. Similarly, writing more simply, using present (rather than past) tense, and using personal voice (e.g., “we” rather than “results” find) can all be useful to improve impact.</p><p>Finally, we note that this special issue offers only a sample of the great research out there that analyzes text for consumer insight. Exploring other text analysis articles might help scholars further understand the diversity of approaches and research problems that these tools might help solve. Recent review articles offer many examples (Kronrod, <span>2022</span>; Packard &amp; Berger, <span>2023</span>).</p><p>For researchers interested in trying out these approaches, there are simple ways to begin exploring. Start by getting some text; this can be responses to a writing prompt from an experiment, thought listings, or online reviews. Then put this data in a spreadsheet, where each participant or observation is a row. Next, try inputting that data into some of the free online tools available for extracting features, such as http://textanalyzer.org/ or http://www.lexicalsuite.com/. LIWC (https://www.liwc.app/) also allows one to try inputting text before purchasing the software.</p><p>For researchers who want to try more sophisticated approaches, a variety of recent papers provide helpful direction (Berger &amp; Packard, <span>2022</span>; Boyd et al., <span>2021</span>; Humphreys &amp; Wang, <span>2018</span>). Finding experienced coauthors and free online courses or websites can offer details on specifics and more advanced methods.</p><p>Finally, once you have got some basics on how to do automated text analysis, reading up on the psychology of language itself could offer ideas about what to measure, and how your findings might fit into language research more broadly. In addition to the review papers cited earlier, books from various traditions provide a great overview of the mechanics and characteristics of language (e.g., Berger, <span>2023</span>; Fahnestock, <span>2011</span>; Pinker, <span>2007</span>).</p><p>The analysis of unstructured data, using automated tools, promises to revolutionize the social sciences. Our hope is that this special issue's collection of novel demonstrations of using text analysis for insights helps inspire more consumer psychologists to help lead this revolution. From understanding how advertising contributes to gender bias (Rathee et al., <span>2023</span>) to how theory of mind shapes smart object usage (Hartmann et al., <span>2023</span>), and offering new ways to capture and understand core constructs such as construal, attribution, credibility, and psychological distance (Pham et al., <span>2023</span>; Sepehri et al., <span>2023</span>) shows that text analysis is no longer just about online reviews and social media posts. By understanding automated text analysis and the different ways it can be used, consumer psychologists can shed light on a range of interesting conceptual and substantive questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48365,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","volume":"33 4","pages":"615-620"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcpy.1383","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer insights from text analysis\",\"authors\":\"Grant Packard,&nbsp;Sarah G. Moore,&nbsp;Jonah Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcpy.1383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Language, whether spoken or written, is fundamental to the consumer experience. It is how consumers express their thoughts, articulate choices, negotiate with others, and receive information about products or services. And it is how marketers deliver persuasion attempts, make apologies, and build relationships with consumers.</p><p>Language has also long been a powerful research tool. Scholars have used content analysis methods like ethnography in interviews, observational studies, and interpretation of language-based artifacts to advance our understanding of consumer culture (e.g., Arnould &amp; Thompson, <span>2005</span>; Stern, <span>1989</span>). Research on the psychology of language has studied how people respond to a range of semantic, syntactic, and rhetorical aspects of verbal communication (Kronrod, <span>2022</span>).</p><p>But something new has emerged in the last decade or so—something that has helped foster a genuine explosion in the analysis of text in consumer research (Packard &amp; Berger, <span>2023</span>). First, language data has become more accessible. While consumers, companies, and other marketplace actors are constantly producing language, only recently has much of this content become digitized (or digitizable), making it far easier to collect and analyze. Every day, billions of consumers share attitudes and opinions online. Customer service calls, depth interviews, and Zoom meetings can be transcribed with the push of a button, and the shift from paper and pencil surveys to online data collection means open-ended participant responses are ready-made for automated text analysis. Similarly, massive online repositories of human conversations, product reviews, books, movie scripts, newspaper articles, and other cultural content provide easy ways to explore ideas in language.</p><p>Second, new tools have changed how language can be analyzed. Previously, language data could only be coded manually. Researchers, or research assistants, would read or listen to language and score it on various dimensions. While manual coding is helpful, it is often subjective and difficult to scale for both lab and field research. Manually reading and carefully evaluating just 10 conversations, online reviews, or thought listings takes a fair amount of time—and reading 1000 takes 100 times as long.</p><p>In recent years, though, psychologists and computer scientists have developed tools that allow language data to be processed and analyzed quickly and easily. Dictionaries like Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC, Tausczik &amp; Pennebaker, <span>2010</span>) allow researchers to count the presence of different words linked to psychological constructs and approaches like latent Dirichlet allocation (Blei et al., <span>2003</span>). Word embeddings (cf. Bakarov, <span>2018</span>) and large language model approaches (e.g., BERT, GPT) make it possible to measure almost any construct. And these tools are becoming more user-friendly every day.</p><p>Just like the microscope revolutionized chemistry and the telescope revolutionized astronomy, ongoing developments in automated textual analysis have allowed researchers in a variety of different domains to unlock a range of new insights from text.</p><p>This special issue presents a collection of exciting articles that showcase how text analysis can illuminate a diverse range of theoretical and substantive topics in consumer psychology. Through the set of theories explored, methods applied, and tools introduced, we hope that scholars who have just begun to explore the space, those who fear they do not have the “know how,” and even text analysis and psychology of language experts will be inspired to consider how these methods can generate new consumer insights.</p><p>Next, we offer a brief synopsis of why each of the special issue articles can help do just that. We discuss articles that combine text analysis and experiments, introduce user-friendly ways to capture constructs and apply cutting-edge methods to novel problems. We then share a brief perspective on the special issue's methodological diversity, discuss who is using text analysis today, and point toward some text analysis resources.</p><p>It is worth noting that several of the special issue authors would not necessarily be thought of as “text analysis people.” Some may have recently added the method to their toolkit. Others partnered with colleagues that brought know-how to the team. This raises an interesting question: who's using text analysis and how? To find out, we asked people on the <i>Society for Consumer Psychology</i> and <i>Association for Consumer Research</i> email lists (research professors and PhD students; <i>N</i> = 220) to answer some questions about their research methods. We did not mention text analysis to try to mitigate self-selection.</p><p>Results indicate that over two-thirds (69%) of scholars—both junior and senior—reported using automated text analysis in their research at least once, suggesting that it is indeed approaching mainstream status as a research method.</p><p>Most researchers who noted they had not used automated text analysis yet said it was primarily due to a lack of knowledge (80%). Hopefully, this special issue will help more scholars see the opportunity and ease of adding automated text analysis to their tool kit or to their research team by finding a colleague to join the effort.</p><p>The articles in the special issue and the use cases outlined in our survey highlight several ways consumer researchers can use text analysis to explore almost any topic.</p><p>First, researchers can use text analysis tools to offer richer tests of existing ideas. They may already have a particular idea in mind about a relationship between a predictor and outcome, or they may even have a sense of what the underlying process might be. Further, they may have conducted some experiments to test these ideas. Automated text analysis can provide further tests, uncover additional relationships, or provide external validity. In experimental work, for example, researchers can have participants respond to open-ended questions or write about experiences, and parse that content to assess dependent variables (Barasch &amp; Berger, <span>2014</span>; Spiller &amp; Belogolova, <span>2017</span>), mediators (Wu et al., <span>2019</span>), or alternative explanations. Similarly, researchers who have conducted carefully controlled experiments may want to test whether their effects hold in the noisy field. Online reviews (Lafreniere, Moore, &amp; Fisher, <span>2022</span>), social media posts (Lee &amp; Junqué de Fortuny, <span>2022</span>), and everything from newspaper articles and books to movie scripts and song lyrics (Packard &amp; Berger, <span>2020</span>; Toubia et al., <span>2021</span>) can provide useful testing grounds for external validity.</p><p>Second, researchers can use these approaches to help develop ideas and theories in the first place (van Osselaer &amp; Janiszewski, <span>2021</span>). Some researchers might be interested in a broad question, like what makes online content viral, or what about customer service interactions lead to greater customer satisfaction. In such situations, they may have a dependent variable in mind but are not sure which independent variable to focus on. By using automated textual analysis to measure multiple independent variables, researchers can explore which features matter most (Hodges et al., <span>2023</span>), and use that to decide where to focus before developing theory and designing subsequent experiments. Similarly, researchers can test alternative explanations by measuring and controlling for other factors that may play a role; they can use automated textual analysis to explore potential underlying processes, simultaneously testing them.</p><p>Third, researchers can use the findings of text analysis to improve their academic writing. Recent work has used natural language processing to explore how to make writing clearer and why some articles are cited more (Warren et al., <span>2021</span>); Boghrati et al., <span>2023</span>). Abstraction, technical language, and passive writing can make research difficult to understand and lead it to be cited less. Similarly, writing more simply, using present (rather than past) tense, and using personal voice (e.g., “we” rather than “results” find) can all be useful to improve impact.</p><p>Finally, we note that this special issue offers only a sample of the great research out there that analyzes text for consumer insight. Exploring other text analysis articles might help scholars further understand the diversity of approaches and research problems that these tools might help solve. Recent review articles offer many examples (Kronrod, <span>2022</span>; Packard &amp; Berger, <span>2023</span>).</p><p>For researchers interested in trying out these approaches, there are simple ways to begin exploring. Start by getting some text; this can be responses to a writing prompt from an experiment, thought listings, or online reviews. Then put this data in a spreadsheet, where each participant or observation is a row. Next, try inputting that data into some of the free online tools available for extracting features, such as http://textanalyzer.org/ or http://www.lexicalsuite.com/. LIWC (https://www.liwc.app/) also allows one to try inputting text before purchasing the software.</p><p>For researchers who want to try more sophisticated approaches, a variety of recent papers provide helpful direction (Berger &amp; Packard, <span>2022</span>; Boyd et al., <span>2021</span>; Humphreys &amp; Wang, <span>2018</span>). Finding experienced coauthors and free online courses or websites can offer details on specifics and more advanced methods.</p><p>Finally, once you have got some basics on how to do automated text analysis, reading up on the psychology of language itself could offer ideas about what to measure, and how your findings might fit into language research more broadly. In addition to the review papers cited earlier, books from various traditions provide a great overview of the mechanics and characteristics of language (e.g., Berger, <span>2023</span>; Fahnestock, <span>2011</span>; Pinker, <span>2007</span>).</p><p>The analysis of unstructured data, using automated tools, promises to revolutionize the social sciences. Our hope is that this special issue's collection of novel demonstrations of using text analysis for insights helps inspire more consumer psychologists to help lead this revolution. From understanding how advertising contributes to gender bias (Rathee et al., <span>2023</span>) to how theory of mind shapes smart object usage (Hartmann et al., <span>2023</span>), and offering new ways to capture and understand core constructs such as construal, attribution, credibility, and psychological distance (Pham et al., <span>2023</span>; Sepehri et al., <span>2023</span>) shows that text analysis is no longer just about online reviews and social media posts. By understanding automated text analysis and the different ways it can be used, consumer psychologists can shed light on a range of interesting conceptual and substantive questions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Psychology\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"615-620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcpy.1383\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcpy.1383\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcpy.1383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言,无论是口头的还是书面的,都是消费者体验的基础。这是消费者如何表达自己的想法、阐明选择、与他人谈判以及接收有关产品或服务的信息。这也是营销人员如何进行说服、道歉以及与消费者建立关系的方式。长期以来,语言也是一种强大的研究工具。学者们在访谈中使用了内容分析方法,如民族志、观察研究和基于语言的人工制品的解释,以促进我们对消费文化的理解(例如,Arnould&amp;Thompson,2005;Stern,1989)。语言心理学研究已经研究了人们对言语交流的一系列语义、句法和修辞方面的反应(Kronrod,2022)。但在过去十年左右的时间里,出现了一些新的东西——这有助于促进消费者研究中文本分析的真正爆发(Packard&amp;Berger,2023)。首先,语言数据变得更容易获取。虽然消费者、公司和其他市场参与者不断生产语言,但直到最近,这些内容中的大部分才变得数字化(或可数字化),使收集和分析变得更加容易。每天,数以十亿计的消费者在网上分享态度和观点。客户服务电话、深度访谈和Zoom会议只需按下一个按钮就可以转录,从纸笔调查到在线数据收集的转变意味着开放式参与者的回答可以用于自动文本分析。同样,大量的人类对话、产品评论、书籍、电影剧本、报纸文章和其他文化内容的在线存储库提供了用语言探索想法的简单方法。其次,新工具改变了分析语言的方式。以前,语言数据只能手动编码。研究人员或研究助理会阅读或倾听语言,并在各个方面进行评分。虽然手动编码是有帮助的,但对于实验室和现场研究来说,它通常是主观的,很难缩放。手动阅读和仔细评估10次对话、在线评论或思想列表需要相当长的时间,而阅读1000次需要100倍的时间。然而,近年来,心理学家和计算机科学家开发了一些工具,可以快速方便地处理和分析语言数据。语言学探究和单词计数等词典(LIWC,Tausczik&amp;Pennebaker,2010)使研究人员能够统计与心理结构和潜在狄利克雷分配等方法相关的不同单词的存在(Blei et al.,2003)。单词嵌入(参见Bakarov,2018)和大型语言模型方法(例如,BERT、GPT)几乎可以测量任何结构。这些工具每天都变得越来越用户友好。就像显微镜彻底改变了化学,望远镜彻底改变了天文学一样,自动化文本分析的不断发展使各种不同领域的研究人员能够从文本中获得一系列新的见解。本期特刊提供了一系列令人兴奋的文章,展示了文本分析如何阐明消费者心理学中的各种理论和实质性主题。通过探索的一系列理论、应用的方法和引入的工具,我们希望刚刚开始探索这个空间的学者、那些担心自己没有“专业知识”的学者,甚至语言专家的文本分析和心理学,都能受到启发,思考这些方法如何产生新的消费者见解。接下来,我们将简要介绍为什么每一篇特刊文章都能帮助做到这一点。我们讨论了将文本分析和实验相结合的文章,介绍了捕捉结构的用户友好方法,并将尖端方法应用于新问题。然后,我们就特刊的方法多样性分享一个简短的观点,讨论今天谁在使用文本分析,并指出一些文本分析资源。值得注意的是,一些特刊作者不一定会被认为是“文本分析人”。有些人可能最近在他们的工具包中添加了这种方法。其他人则与同事合作,为团队带来专业知识。这就提出了一个有趣的问题:谁在使用文本分析,如何使用?为了找出答案,我们询问了消费者心理学协会和消费者研究协会电子邮件列表上的人(研究教授和博士生;N = 220)来回答关于他们的研究方法的一些问题。我们没有提到文本分析来减少自我选择。结果表明,超过三分之二(69%)的学者——包括初级和高级学者——报告称在他们的研究中至少使用过一次自动文本分析,这表明它确实正在接近作为一种研究方法的主流地位。 大多数研究人员指出,他们还没有使用自动文本分析,他们表示,这主要是由于缺乏知识(80%)。希望这期特刊能帮助更多的学者找到一位同事加入这项工作,从而将自动文本分析添加到他们的工具包或研究团队中。特刊中的文章和我们调查中概述的用例强调了消费者研究人员可以使用文本分析来探索几乎任何主题的几种方法。首先,研究人员可以使用文本分析工具对现有想法进行更丰富的测试。他们可能已经对预测因素和结果之间的关系有了特定的想法,或者他们甚至可能对潜在的过程有了某种感觉。此外,他们可能已经进行了一些实验来测试这些想法。自动文本分析可以提供进一步的测试,揭示额外的关系,或提供外部有效性。例如,在实验工作中,研究人员可以让参与者回答开放式问题或写下关于经验的文章,并解析这些内容来评估因变量(Barasch和Berger,2014;Spiller和Belogolova,2017)、中介(Wu et al.,2019)或替代解释。同样,进行了仔细控制实验的研究人员可能想测试它们的效果在嘈杂的环境中是否有效。在线评论(Lafreniere,Moore,&amp;Fisher,2022)、社交媒体帖子(Lee和Junquéde Fortuny,2022),以及从报纸文章和书籍到电影剧本和歌词的一切(Packard&amp;Berger,2020;Toubia等人,2021)都可以为外部有效性提供有用的测试依据。其次,研究人员可以首先使用这些方法来帮助发展思想和理论(van Osselaer和Janiszewski,2021)。一些研究人员可能对一个广泛的问题感兴趣,比如是什么让在线内容像病毒一样传播,或者客户服务互动如何提高客户满意度。在这种情况下,他们可能会想到一个因变量,但不确定该关注哪个自变量。通过使用自动文本分析来测量多个自变量,研究人员可以探索哪些特征最重要(Hodges et al.,2023),并在开发理论和设计后续实验之前,利用这些特征来决定关注点。同样,研究人员可以通过测量和控制可能发挥作用的其他因素来测试替代解释;他们可以使用自动化的文本分析来探索潜在的底层过程,同时对它们进行测试。第三,研究者可以利用文本分析的结果来提高他们的学术写作水平。最近的工作使用自然语言处理来探索如何使写作更清晰,以及为什么一些文章被引用更多(Warren et al.,2021);Boghrati等人,2023)。抽象、技术语言和被动写作会使研究难以理解,并导致其被引用较少。同样,更简单地写作,使用现在时(而不是过去时),以及使用个人声音(例如,“我们”而不是“结果”),都有助于提高影响力。最后,我们注意到,本期特刊只提供了一个伟大研究的样本,这些研究分析文本以获得消费者的洞察力。探索其他文本分析文章可能有助于学者进一步了解这些工具可能帮助解决的方法和研究问题的多样性。最近的综述文章提供了许多例子(Kronrod,2022;Packard&amp;Berger,2023)。对于有兴趣尝试这些方法的研究人员来说,有一些简单的方法可以开始探索。从获取一些文本开始;这可以是对实验、想法列表或在线评论中的写作提示的回应。然后将这些数据放在电子表格中,每个参与者或观察结果都是一行。接下来,尝试将这些数据输入到一些免费的在线工具中,用于提取特征,例如http://textanalyzer.org/或http://www.lexicalsuite.com/.LIWC(https://www.liwc.app/)还允许用户在购买软件之前尝试输入文本。对于想要尝试更复杂方法的研究人员来说,最近的各种论文提供了有益的方向(Berger&amp;Packard,2022;Boyd等人,2021;Humphreys和Wang,2018)。寻找经验丰富的合著者和免费的在线课程或网站可以提供细节和更先进的方法。最后,一旦你掌握了一些关于如何进行自动文本分析的基础知识,阅读语言本身的心理学可以提供关于测量什么以及你的发现如何更广泛地融入语言研究的想法。除了前面引用的综述论文外,来自不同传统的书籍对语言的机制和特征提供了很好的概述(例如,Berger,2023;Fahnestock,2011年;平克,2007年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumer insights from text analysis

Language, whether spoken or written, is fundamental to the consumer experience. It is how consumers express their thoughts, articulate choices, negotiate with others, and receive information about products or services. And it is how marketers deliver persuasion attempts, make apologies, and build relationships with consumers.

Language has also long been a powerful research tool. Scholars have used content analysis methods like ethnography in interviews, observational studies, and interpretation of language-based artifacts to advance our understanding of consumer culture (e.g., Arnould & Thompson, 2005; Stern, 1989). Research on the psychology of language has studied how people respond to a range of semantic, syntactic, and rhetorical aspects of verbal communication (Kronrod, 2022).

But something new has emerged in the last decade or so—something that has helped foster a genuine explosion in the analysis of text in consumer research (Packard & Berger, 2023). First, language data has become more accessible. While consumers, companies, and other marketplace actors are constantly producing language, only recently has much of this content become digitized (or digitizable), making it far easier to collect and analyze. Every day, billions of consumers share attitudes and opinions online. Customer service calls, depth interviews, and Zoom meetings can be transcribed with the push of a button, and the shift from paper and pencil surveys to online data collection means open-ended participant responses are ready-made for automated text analysis. Similarly, massive online repositories of human conversations, product reviews, books, movie scripts, newspaper articles, and other cultural content provide easy ways to explore ideas in language.

Second, new tools have changed how language can be analyzed. Previously, language data could only be coded manually. Researchers, or research assistants, would read or listen to language and score it on various dimensions. While manual coding is helpful, it is often subjective and difficult to scale for both lab and field research. Manually reading and carefully evaluating just 10 conversations, online reviews, or thought listings takes a fair amount of time—and reading 1000 takes 100 times as long.

In recent years, though, psychologists and computer scientists have developed tools that allow language data to be processed and analyzed quickly and easily. Dictionaries like Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC, Tausczik & Pennebaker, 2010) allow researchers to count the presence of different words linked to psychological constructs and approaches like latent Dirichlet allocation (Blei et al., 2003). Word embeddings (cf. Bakarov, 2018) and large language model approaches (e.g., BERT, GPT) make it possible to measure almost any construct. And these tools are becoming more user-friendly every day.

Just like the microscope revolutionized chemistry and the telescope revolutionized astronomy, ongoing developments in automated textual analysis have allowed researchers in a variety of different domains to unlock a range of new insights from text.

This special issue presents a collection of exciting articles that showcase how text analysis can illuminate a diverse range of theoretical and substantive topics in consumer psychology. Through the set of theories explored, methods applied, and tools introduced, we hope that scholars who have just begun to explore the space, those who fear they do not have the “know how,” and even text analysis and psychology of language experts will be inspired to consider how these methods can generate new consumer insights.

Next, we offer a brief synopsis of why each of the special issue articles can help do just that. We discuss articles that combine text analysis and experiments, introduce user-friendly ways to capture constructs and apply cutting-edge methods to novel problems. We then share a brief perspective on the special issue's methodological diversity, discuss who is using text analysis today, and point toward some text analysis resources.

It is worth noting that several of the special issue authors would not necessarily be thought of as “text analysis people.” Some may have recently added the method to their toolkit. Others partnered with colleagues that brought know-how to the team. This raises an interesting question: who's using text analysis and how? To find out, we asked people on the Society for Consumer Psychology and Association for Consumer Research email lists (research professors and PhD students; N = 220) to answer some questions about their research methods. We did not mention text analysis to try to mitigate self-selection.

Results indicate that over two-thirds (69%) of scholars—both junior and senior—reported using automated text analysis in their research at least once, suggesting that it is indeed approaching mainstream status as a research method.

Most researchers who noted they had not used automated text analysis yet said it was primarily due to a lack of knowledge (80%). Hopefully, this special issue will help more scholars see the opportunity and ease of adding automated text analysis to their tool kit or to their research team by finding a colleague to join the effort.

The articles in the special issue and the use cases outlined in our survey highlight several ways consumer researchers can use text analysis to explore almost any topic.

First, researchers can use text analysis tools to offer richer tests of existing ideas. They may already have a particular idea in mind about a relationship between a predictor and outcome, or they may even have a sense of what the underlying process might be. Further, they may have conducted some experiments to test these ideas. Automated text analysis can provide further tests, uncover additional relationships, or provide external validity. In experimental work, for example, researchers can have participants respond to open-ended questions or write about experiences, and parse that content to assess dependent variables (Barasch & Berger, 2014; Spiller & Belogolova, 2017), mediators (Wu et al., 2019), or alternative explanations. Similarly, researchers who have conducted carefully controlled experiments may want to test whether their effects hold in the noisy field. Online reviews (Lafreniere, Moore, & Fisher, 2022), social media posts (Lee & Junqué de Fortuny, 2022), and everything from newspaper articles and books to movie scripts and song lyrics (Packard & Berger, 2020; Toubia et al., 2021) can provide useful testing grounds for external validity.

Second, researchers can use these approaches to help develop ideas and theories in the first place (van Osselaer & Janiszewski, 2021). Some researchers might be interested in a broad question, like what makes online content viral, or what about customer service interactions lead to greater customer satisfaction. In such situations, they may have a dependent variable in mind but are not sure which independent variable to focus on. By using automated textual analysis to measure multiple independent variables, researchers can explore which features matter most (Hodges et al., 2023), and use that to decide where to focus before developing theory and designing subsequent experiments. Similarly, researchers can test alternative explanations by measuring and controlling for other factors that may play a role; they can use automated textual analysis to explore potential underlying processes, simultaneously testing them.

Third, researchers can use the findings of text analysis to improve their academic writing. Recent work has used natural language processing to explore how to make writing clearer and why some articles are cited more (Warren et al., 2021); Boghrati et al., 2023). Abstraction, technical language, and passive writing can make research difficult to understand and lead it to be cited less. Similarly, writing more simply, using present (rather than past) tense, and using personal voice (e.g., “we” rather than “results” find) can all be useful to improve impact.

Finally, we note that this special issue offers only a sample of the great research out there that analyzes text for consumer insight. Exploring other text analysis articles might help scholars further understand the diversity of approaches and research problems that these tools might help solve. Recent review articles offer many examples (Kronrod, 2022; Packard & Berger, 2023).

For researchers interested in trying out these approaches, there are simple ways to begin exploring. Start by getting some text; this can be responses to a writing prompt from an experiment, thought listings, or online reviews. Then put this data in a spreadsheet, where each participant or observation is a row. Next, try inputting that data into some of the free online tools available for extracting features, such as http://textanalyzer.org/ or http://www.lexicalsuite.com/. LIWC (https://www.liwc.app/) also allows one to try inputting text before purchasing the software.

For researchers who want to try more sophisticated approaches, a variety of recent papers provide helpful direction (Berger & Packard, 2022; Boyd et al., 2021; Humphreys & Wang, 2018). Finding experienced coauthors and free online courses or websites can offer details on specifics and more advanced methods.

Finally, once you have got some basics on how to do automated text analysis, reading up on the psychology of language itself could offer ideas about what to measure, and how your findings might fit into language research more broadly. In addition to the review papers cited earlier, books from various traditions provide a great overview of the mechanics and characteristics of language (e.g., Berger, 2023; Fahnestock, 2011; Pinker, 2007).

The analysis of unstructured data, using automated tools, promises to revolutionize the social sciences. Our hope is that this special issue's collection of novel demonstrations of using text analysis for insights helps inspire more consumer psychologists to help lead this revolution. From understanding how advertising contributes to gender bias (Rathee et al., 2023) to how theory of mind shapes smart object usage (Hartmann et al., 2023), and offering new ways to capture and understand core constructs such as construal, attribution, credibility, and psychological distance (Pham et al., 2023; Sepehri et al., 2023) shows that text analysis is no longer just about online reviews and social media posts. By understanding automated text analysis and the different ways it can be used, consumer psychologists can shed light on a range of interesting conceptual and substantive questions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Psychology is devoted to psychological perspectives on the study of the consumer. It publishes articles that contribute both theoretically and empirically to an understanding of psychological processes underlying consumers thoughts, feelings, decisions, and behaviors. Areas of emphasis include, but are not limited to, consumer judgment and decision processes, attitude formation and change, reactions to persuasive communications, affective experiences, consumer information processing, consumer-brand relationships, affective, cognitive, and motivational determinants of consumer behavior, family and group decision processes, and cultural and individual differences in consumer behavior.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Refining and expanding applications of Moral Foundations Theory in consumer psychology Message framing to enhance consumer compliance with disease detection communication for prevention: The moderating role of age AI‐induced dehumanization The model‐sizing dilemma: The use of varied female model sizes helps the impressions of brand values but hurts shopping ease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1