前己二酮钙对球道高一年生早熟禾和匍匐草草地的植物生长调控及回弹效应

Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1002/cft2.20224
Jaber Husiny, Alexandra Ficht, John R. Watson, Eric M. Lyons
{"title":"前己二酮钙对球道高一年生早熟禾和匍匐草草地的植物生长调控及回弹效应","authors":"Jaber Husiny,&nbsp;Alexandra Ficht,&nbsp;John R. Watson,&nbsp;Eric M. Lyons","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plant growth regulators (PGRs) are commonly used to manage turfgrass growth on golf courses. Growing degree day (GDD) models predict the need for reapplication of PGRs, such as trinexapac-ethyl (TE) resulting in a potential loss of regulation. Optimal GDD models for application of prohexadione calcium (PC), a late-stage gibberellin inhibitor, on fairway-height turfgrasses are currently unknown. The effect of PC and TE on plant growth and stand health were evaluated in two separate seasons on mixed stands of creeping bentgrass (<i>Agrostis stolonifera</i> L.) and annual bluegrass (<i>Poa annua</i> L.) maintained at 9-mm height at the Guelph Turfgrass Institute. Five treatments (control, PC 2.8 g 100 m<sup>−2</sup> [0.09 oz 1000 ft<sup>−2</sup>], PC 5.6 g 100 m<sup>−2</sup> [0.18 oz 1000 ft<sup>−2</sup>], PC 8.4 g 100 m<sup>−2</sup> [0.27 oz 1000 ft<sup>−2</sup>], and TE 8.0 mL 100 m<sup>−2</sup> [0.26 fl oz 1000 ft<sup>−2</sup>]) were applied based on a label rate GDD schedule. Plant clipping dry weight (DW), visual color ratings and normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) were assessed. Most PC and TE treatments effectively reduced DW and had a positive effect on visual color and NDVI. A relationship was observed between PC application rates, suggesting that higher application rates allow for greater regulation of plant growth. Rebound effects or periods of excess growth, occurred when reapplication intervals exceeded 350 GDD and had an average of thermal time greater than 21.0 GDD over a 10-day period. Using optimal GDD models for PC will assist in the effective regulation of turfgrass growth and improved stand health.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20224","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant growth regulation and the rebound effect when prohexadione calcium is applied to fairway-height annual bluegrass and creeping bentgrass swards\",\"authors\":\"Jaber Husiny,&nbsp;Alexandra Ficht,&nbsp;John R. Watson,&nbsp;Eric M. Lyons\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cft2.20224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Plant growth regulators (PGRs) are commonly used to manage turfgrass growth on golf courses. Growing degree day (GDD) models predict the need for reapplication of PGRs, such as trinexapac-ethyl (TE) resulting in a potential loss of regulation. Optimal GDD models for application of prohexadione calcium (PC), a late-stage gibberellin inhibitor, on fairway-height turfgrasses are currently unknown. The effect of PC and TE on plant growth and stand health were evaluated in two separate seasons on mixed stands of creeping bentgrass (<i>Agrostis stolonifera</i> L.) and annual bluegrass (<i>Poa annua</i> L.) maintained at 9-mm height at the Guelph Turfgrass Institute. Five treatments (control, PC 2.8 g 100 m<sup>−2</sup> [0.09 oz 1000 ft<sup>−2</sup>], PC 5.6 g 100 m<sup>−2</sup> [0.18 oz 1000 ft<sup>−2</sup>], PC 8.4 g 100 m<sup>−2</sup> [0.27 oz 1000 ft<sup>−2</sup>], and TE 8.0 mL 100 m<sup>−2</sup> [0.26 fl oz 1000 ft<sup>−2</sup>]) were applied based on a label rate GDD schedule. Plant clipping dry weight (DW), visual color ratings and normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) were assessed. Most PC and TE treatments effectively reduced DW and had a positive effect on visual color and NDVI. A relationship was observed between PC application rates, suggesting that higher application rates allow for greater regulation of plant growth. Rebound effects or periods of excess growth, occurred when reapplication intervals exceeded 350 GDD and had an average of thermal time greater than 21.0 GDD over a 10-day period. Using optimal GDD models for PC will assist in the effective regulation of turfgrass growth and improved stand health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20224\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物生长调节剂(PGR)通常用于管理高尔夫球场上的草坪草生长。生长度日(GDD)模型预测需要重新应用PGR,如乙基三内六胺(TE),从而导致潜在的调节损失。在球道高度草坪草上应用前六酮钙(PC)(一种后期赤霉素抑制剂)的最佳GDD模型目前尚不清楚。在圭尔夫草坪研究所,在两个不同的季节,在保持在9mm高度的匍匐底栖草(Agrostis stolonifera L.)和一年生蓝草(Poa annua L.)的混合林上评估了PC和TE对植物生长和林分健康的影响。根据标记率GDD计划,应用了五种处理(对照组,PC 2.8 g 100 m−2[0.09 oz 1000 ft−2]、PC 5.6 g 100 m³2[0.18 oz 1000英尺−2]、PC8.4 g 100 m²[0.27 oz 1000 f−2]和TE 8.0 mL 100 m−2[0.26 fl oz 1000 t−2])。评估了植物修剪干重(DW)、视觉颜色等级和归一化差异营养指数(NDVI)。大多数PC和TE处理有效地降低了DW,并对视觉颜色和NDVI产生了积极影响。观察到PC施用率之间的关系,表明较高的施用率可以更好地调节植物生长。当重新施用间隔超过350 GDD并且在10天内平均热时间大于21.0 GDD时,会出现反弹效应或过度生长期。使用PC的最优GDD模型将有助于有效调节草坪草生长和改善林分健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Plant growth regulation and the rebound effect when prohexadione calcium is applied to fairway-height annual bluegrass and creeping bentgrass swards

Plant growth regulators (PGRs) are commonly used to manage turfgrass growth on golf courses. Growing degree day (GDD) models predict the need for reapplication of PGRs, such as trinexapac-ethyl (TE) resulting in a potential loss of regulation. Optimal GDD models for application of prohexadione calcium (PC), a late-stage gibberellin inhibitor, on fairway-height turfgrasses are currently unknown. The effect of PC and TE on plant growth and stand health were evaluated in two separate seasons on mixed stands of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) and annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) maintained at 9-mm height at the Guelph Turfgrass Institute. Five treatments (control, PC 2.8 g 100 m−2 [0.09 oz 1000 ft−2], PC 5.6 g 100 m−2 [0.18 oz 1000 ft−2], PC 8.4 g 100 m−2 [0.27 oz 1000 ft−2], and TE 8.0 mL 100 m−2 [0.26 fl oz 1000 ft−2]) were applied based on a label rate GDD schedule. Plant clipping dry weight (DW), visual color ratings and normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) were assessed. Most PC and TE treatments effectively reduced DW and had a positive effect on visual color and NDVI. A relationship was observed between PC application rates, suggesting that higher application rates allow for greater regulation of plant growth. Rebound effects or periods of excess growth, occurred when reapplication intervals exceeded 350 GDD and had an average of thermal time greater than 21.0 GDD over a 10-day period. Using optimal GDD models for PC will assist in the effective regulation of turfgrass growth and improved stand health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1