抑郁症状和核心情感:网络和回归分析结果

Edmunds Vanags, Malgožata Raščevska
{"title":"抑郁症状和核心情感:网络和回归分析结果","authors":"Edmunds Vanags,&nbsp;Malgožata Raščevska","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Depression is measured in most studies by surveys that sum individual symptom scores into one common variable. Given the high heterogeneity of depressive disorders and the diversity of symptom profiles at the same levels of depression, a significant amount of information is, therefore, not evaluated. In this study, we aimed to investigate how distinct depression symptoms from the tripartite model of anxiety and depression relate to the dimensions of core affect. The study included <i>N</i> = 1102 individuals who completed depression, anxiety and stress, and core affect scales. Participants were recruited from the convenience sample and were aged between 18 and 59 years (<i>M</i> = 39.70; SD = 12.03) with 38.2% men and 61.8% women, whose average number of years spent in education was <i>M</i> = 14.17; SD = 3.63. Correlation and regression analysis with JASP and R software showed that all depressive symptoms were significantly related to the core affect dimensions (valence and activation), and network analysis indicated which symptoms formed undirected interrelationships and what their possible roles were in the model. We concluded that not all depression symptoms in the network model formed similar relationships with the dimensions of core affect, which may be explained through both validity and nonclinical sampling aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 1","pages":"37-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.13","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depression symptoms and core affect: Results from network and regression analyses\",\"authors\":\"Edmunds Vanags,&nbsp;Malgožata Raščevska\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mhs2.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Depression is measured in most studies by surveys that sum individual symptom scores into one common variable. Given the high heterogeneity of depressive disorders and the diversity of symptom profiles at the same levels of depression, a significant amount of information is, therefore, not evaluated. In this study, we aimed to investigate how distinct depression symptoms from the tripartite model of anxiety and depression relate to the dimensions of core affect. The study included <i>N</i> = 1102 individuals who completed depression, anxiety and stress, and core affect scales. Participants were recruited from the convenience sample and were aged between 18 and 59 years (<i>M</i> = 39.70; SD = 12.03) with 38.2% men and 61.8% women, whose average number of years spent in education was <i>M</i> = 14.17; SD = 3.63. Correlation and regression analysis with JASP and R software showed that all depressive symptoms were significantly related to the core affect dimensions (valence and activation), and network analysis indicated which symptoms formed undirected interrelationships and what their possible roles were in the model. We concluded that not all depression symptoms in the network model formed similar relationships with the dimensions of core affect, which may be explained through both validity and nonclinical sampling aspects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental health science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"37-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.13\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental health science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大多数研究中,抑郁是通过将个人症状得分汇总为一个共同变量的调查来衡量的。鉴于抑郁障碍的高度异质性和相同抑郁水平下症状特征的多样性,因此没有对大量信息进行评估。在这项研究中,我们旨在调查焦虑和抑郁三方模型中不同的抑郁症状与核心情感维度之间的关系。该研究包括N = 1102名完成抑郁、焦虑和压力以及核心情感量表的个体。参与者是从便利样本中招募的,年龄在18-59岁之间(M = 39.70;SD = 12.03),其中38.2%为男性,61.8%为女性,平均受教育年限为M = 14.17;SD = 3.63.JASP和R软件的相关和回归分析表明,所有抑郁症状都与核心情感维度(效价和激活)显著相关,网络分析表明哪些症状形成了无方向的相互关系,以及它们在模型中可能扮演的角色。我们得出的结论是,并非网络模型中的所有抑郁症状都与核心情感维度形成了相似的关系,这可以通过有效性和非临床抽样两个方面来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Depression symptoms and core affect: Results from network and regression analyses

Depression is measured in most studies by surveys that sum individual symptom scores into one common variable. Given the high heterogeneity of depressive disorders and the diversity of symptom profiles at the same levels of depression, a significant amount of information is, therefore, not evaluated. In this study, we aimed to investigate how distinct depression symptoms from the tripartite model of anxiety and depression relate to the dimensions of core affect. The study included N = 1102 individuals who completed depression, anxiety and stress, and core affect scales. Participants were recruited from the convenience sample and were aged between 18 and 59 years (M = 39.70; SD = 12.03) with 38.2% men and 61.8% women, whose average number of years spent in education was M = 14.17; SD = 3.63. Correlation and regression analysis with JASP and R software showed that all depressive symptoms were significantly related to the core affect dimensions (valence and activation), and network analysis indicated which symptoms formed undirected interrelationships and what their possible roles were in the model. We concluded that not all depression symptoms in the network model formed similar relationships with the dimensions of core affect, which may be explained through both validity and nonclinical sampling aspects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The simultaneous impact of interventions on optimism and depression: A meta-analysis Social sharing and expressive suppression in major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder: An experience sampling study Predictors of preoperative anxiety in pediatric surgical patients in Ghana: A bi-center study Using passive and active data to predict posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and cannabis use in recently discharged UK veterans: A protocol for the MAVERICK feasibility study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1