{"title":"“关于玫瑰的探戈”:用《温柔的翅膀》思考","authors":"Emily Cox","doi":"10.1111/1467-8365.12734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>‘[It] transported me a thousand miles from London, to a thousand years from the age of Mr. Gladstone’, recalled Robert de la Sizeranne of Edward Burne-Jones's <i>Briar Rose</i> series (1884–90). This essay argues, on the contrary, that the paintings were closer to contemporary concerns than Sizeranne allowed. In Burne-Jones's briar, we find a remarkable example of one of the late nineteenth century's most promiscuous and ambiguous motifs: the tendril. Perhaps unexpectedly, this ornamental motif was at the centre of <i>fin-de-siècle</i> debates about time, capitalist expansion, and imperialism. In visual art, philosophy, and art history, the tendril figured anxieties about where Europe was heading. Tracing its movement through Burne-Jones's canvases into texts by Henri Bergson and Alois Riegl, and decorative art by Victor Horta and William Morris, this essay contends that the tendril traverses a shared, but fragile, trans-European imperial landscape at the end of the nineteenth century.</p>","PeriodicalId":8456,"journal":{"name":"Art History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘About the Tangle of the Rose’: Thinking with the Fin-de-Siècle Tendril\",\"authors\":\"Emily Cox\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8365.12734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>‘[It] transported me a thousand miles from London, to a thousand years from the age of Mr. Gladstone’, recalled Robert de la Sizeranne of Edward Burne-Jones's <i>Briar Rose</i> series (1884–90). This essay argues, on the contrary, that the paintings were closer to contemporary concerns than Sizeranne allowed. In Burne-Jones's briar, we find a remarkable example of one of the late nineteenth century's most promiscuous and ambiguous motifs: the tendril. Perhaps unexpectedly, this ornamental motif was at the centre of <i>fin-de-siècle</i> debates about time, capitalist expansion, and imperialism. In visual art, philosophy, and art history, the tendril figured anxieties about where Europe was heading. Tracing its movement through Burne-Jones's canvases into texts by Henri Bergson and Alois Riegl, and decorative art by Victor Horta and William Morris, this essay contends that the tendril traverses a shared, but fragile, trans-European imperial landscape at the end of the nineteenth century.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8365.12734\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8365.12734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
爱德华·伯恩·琼斯(Edward Burne Jones)的《玫瑰》(Briar Rose)系列(1884–90)中的罗伯特·德拉西泽兰(Robert de la Sizeranne)回忆道:“(它)把我从伦敦带了一千英里,从格莱斯顿先生的年龄带了一千年。”。相反,这篇文章认为,这些画比Sizeranne所允许的更接近当代关注。在伯恩·琼斯的《荆棘》中,我们发现了19世纪末最混乱、最模糊的主题之一的一个显著例子:卷须。也许出乎意料的是,这个装饰性的主题成为了关于时间、资本主义扩张和帝国主义的最后辩论的中心。在视觉艺术、哲学和艺术史上,卷须描绘了对欧洲走向的焦虑。本文通过伯恩·琼斯的画布,将其运动追溯到亨利·伯格森和阿洛伊斯·里格尔的文本中,以及维克托·奥尔塔和威廉·莫里斯的装饰艺术中,认为卷须在19世纪末穿越了一个共同但脆弱的跨欧帝国景观。
‘About the Tangle of the Rose’: Thinking with the Fin-de-Siècle Tendril
‘[It] transported me a thousand miles from London, to a thousand years from the age of Mr. Gladstone’, recalled Robert de la Sizeranne of Edward Burne-Jones's Briar Rose series (1884–90). This essay argues, on the contrary, that the paintings were closer to contemporary concerns than Sizeranne allowed. In Burne-Jones's briar, we find a remarkable example of one of the late nineteenth century's most promiscuous and ambiguous motifs: the tendril. Perhaps unexpectedly, this ornamental motif was at the centre of fin-de-siècle debates about time, capitalist expansion, and imperialism. In visual art, philosophy, and art history, the tendril figured anxieties about where Europe was heading. Tracing its movement through Burne-Jones's canvases into texts by Henri Bergson and Alois Riegl, and decorative art by Victor Horta and William Morris, this essay contends that the tendril traverses a shared, but fragile, trans-European imperial landscape at the end of the nineteenth century.
期刊介绍:
Art History is a refereed journal that publishes essays and reviews on all aspects, areas and periods of the history of art, from a diversity of perspectives. Founded in 1978, it has established an international reputation for publishing innovative essays at the cutting edge of contemporary scholarship, whether on earlier or more recent periods. At the forefront of scholarly enquiry, Art History is opening up the discipline to new developments and to interdisciplinary and cross-cultural approaches.