印度语言马拉雅拉姆语正畸体验问卷的有效性和可靠性。

Q2 Dentistry Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2023-09-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_5_23
Baby Jisha, Sreehari Sathyanadhan, Shobha Sundareswaran, Prathapan Parayaruthottam, Muhammed Shibin
{"title":"印度语言马拉雅拉姆语正畸体验问卷的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Baby Jisha,&nbsp;Sreehari Sathyanadhan,&nbsp;Shobha Sundareswaran,&nbsp;Prathapan Parayaruthottam,&nbsp;Muhammed Shibin","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_5_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To translate the orthodontic experience questionnaire into Malayalam, an Indian language, and assess its validity and reliability in the Kerala population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The original questionnaire, which was developed in English, was translated into Malayalam. Face validity was assessed, and minor changes were made, followed by a content validity assessment by an expert panel. The final version was given to 324 patients who marked their responses on a Likert scale. Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Principal component factor analysis was performed to regroup the valid items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The principal component factor analysis revealed three domains. Reliability assessed by Cronbach's alpha of the whole questionnaire was 0.799, and that of the three domains was 0.73, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively. The test-retest reliability was found to be good (0.798).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Malayalam version of the orthodontic experience questionnaire was found to be content valid with good reliability. To obtain a successful treatment result, an orthodontist must be aware of these and this questionnaire, with adequate validity and reliability, has been designed to achieve this in the Malayalam-speaking population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/4b/JOS-12-48.PMC10597366.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the orthodontic experience questionnaire in Malayalam, an Indian language.\",\"authors\":\"Baby Jisha,&nbsp;Sreehari Sathyanadhan,&nbsp;Shobha Sundareswaran,&nbsp;Prathapan Parayaruthottam,&nbsp;Muhammed Shibin\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jos.jos_5_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To translate the orthodontic experience questionnaire into Malayalam, an Indian language, and assess its validity and reliability in the Kerala population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The original questionnaire, which was developed in English, was translated into Malayalam. Face validity was assessed, and minor changes were made, followed by a content validity assessment by an expert panel. The final version was given to 324 patients who marked their responses on a Likert scale. Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Principal component factor analysis was performed to regroup the valid items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The principal component factor analysis revealed three domains. Reliability assessed by Cronbach's alpha of the whole questionnaire was 0.799, and that of the three domains was 0.73, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively. The test-retest reliability was found to be good (0.798).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Malayalam version of the orthodontic experience questionnaire was found to be content valid with good reliability. To obtain a successful treatment result, an orthodontist must be aware of these and this questionnaire, with adequate validity and reliability, has been designed to achieve this in the Malayalam-speaking population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/4b/JOS-12-48.PMC10597366.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_5_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_5_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:将正畸体验问卷翻译成印度语言马拉雅拉姆语,并评估其在喀拉拉邦人群中的有效性和可靠性。材料和方法:最初的问卷是用英语编制的,并被翻译成马拉雅拉姆语。对人脸有效性进行了评估,并进行了细微的更改,然后由专家小组对内容有效性进行评估。324名患者接受了最终版本的Likert量表评分。内部一致性信度采用Cronbachα检验,重测信度采用组内相关系数检验。进行主成分因素分析以重新组合有效项目。结果:主成分因子分析揭示了三个领域。整个问卷的Cronbachα信度为0.799,三个领域的信度分别为0.73、0.71和0.71。重测信度良好(0.798)。结论:马拉雅拉姆版本的正畸体验问卷内容有效,信度良好。为了获得成功的治疗结果,正畸医生必须意识到这些,这份问卷具有足够的有效性和可靠性,旨在在讲马拉雅拉姆语的人群中实现这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of the orthodontic experience questionnaire in Malayalam, an Indian language.

Aim: To translate the orthodontic experience questionnaire into Malayalam, an Indian language, and assess its validity and reliability in the Kerala population.

Materials and methods: The original questionnaire, which was developed in English, was translated into Malayalam. Face validity was assessed, and minor changes were made, followed by a content validity assessment by an expert panel. The final version was given to 324 patients who marked their responses on a Likert scale. Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Principal component factor analysis was performed to regroup the valid items.

Results: The principal component factor analysis revealed three domains. Reliability assessed by Cronbach's alpha of the whole questionnaire was 0.799, and that of the three domains was 0.73, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively. The test-retest reliability was found to be good (0.798).

Conclusion: The Malayalam version of the orthodontic experience questionnaire was found to be content valid with good reliability. To obtain a successful treatment result, an orthodontist must be aware of these and this questionnaire, with adequate validity and reliability, has been designed to achieve this in the Malayalam-speaking population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating the characteristics of the mandibular canal in cone beam CT. Orthodontic practice marketing: The orthodontist and laypeople's perspective. Role of physical and dentofacial features in bullying among United Arab Emirates schoolchildren and its impact on school performance - A cross-sectional study. Quantitative assessment of orthodontic treatments performed by graduate orthodontic students of an International School of Dentistry. Skeletal and dental effects of skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant devices during class II malocclusion treatment: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1