Yasodhara Deepachandi Gunasekara, Sanda Arunika Kottawatta, Thilini Nisansala, Isuru Jayamina Bandara Wijewickrama, Yasodha I. Basnayake, Ayona Silva-Fletcher, Ruwani Sagarika Kalupahana
{"title":"“一个健康”视角下的抗生素耐药性:一项来自斯里兰卡城市和农村地区的研究。","authors":"Yasodhara Deepachandi Gunasekara, Sanda Arunika Kottawatta, Thilini Nisansala, Isuru Jayamina Bandara Wijewickrama, Yasodha I. Basnayake, Ayona Silva-Fletcher, Ruwani Sagarika Kalupahana","doi":"10.1111/zph.13087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to investigate and compare the proportion of AMR <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) between urban (Dompe in the Western province) and rural (Dambana in the Sabaragamuwa province) areas in Sri Lanka. The overall hypothesis of the study is that there is a difference in the proportion of AMR <i>E. coli</i> between the urban and the rural areas. Faecal samples were collected from healthy humans (<i>n</i> = 109), dairy animals (<i>n</i> = 103), poultry (<i>n</i> = 35), wild mammals (<i>n</i> = 81), wild birds (<i>n</i> = 76), soil (<i>n</i> = 80) and water (<i>n</i> = 80) from both areas. A total of 908 <i>E. coli</i> isolates were tested for susceptibility to 12 antimicrobials. Overall, <i>E. coli</i> isolated from urban area was significantly more likely to be resistant than those isolated from rural area. The human domain of the area had a significantly higher prevalence of AMR <i>E. coli</i>, but it was not significantly different in urban (98%) and rural (97%) areas. AMR <i>E. coli</i> isolated from dairy animals, wild animals and water was significantly higher in the urban area compared with the rural area. There was no significant difference in the proportion of multidrug resistance (MDR) <i>E. coli</i> isolated from humans, wild animals and water between the two study sites. Resistant isolates found from water and wild animals suggest contamination of the environment. A multi-sectorial One Health approach is urgently needed to control the spread of AMR and prevent the occurrences of AMR in Sri Lanka.</p>","PeriodicalId":24025,"journal":{"name":"Zoonoses and Public Health","volume":"71 1","pages":"84-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/zph.13087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic resistance through the lens of One Health: A study from an urban and a rural area in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Yasodhara Deepachandi Gunasekara, Sanda Arunika Kottawatta, Thilini Nisansala, Isuru Jayamina Bandara Wijewickrama, Yasodha I. Basnayake, Ayona Silva-Fletcher, Ruwani Sagarika Kalupahana\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/zph.13087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aimed to investigate and compare the proportion of AMR <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) between urban (Dompe in the Western province) and rural (Dambana in the Sabaragamuwa province) areas in Sri Lanka. The overall hypothesis of the study is that there is a difference in the proportion of AMR <i>E. coli</i> between the urban and the rural areas. Faecal samples were collected from healthy humans (<i>n</i> = 109), dairy animals (<i>n</i> = 103), poultry (<i>n</i> = 35), wild mammals (<i>n</i> = 81), wild birds (<i>n</i> = 76), soil (<i>n</i> = 80) and water (<i>n</i> = 80) from both areas. A total of 908 <i>E. coli</i> isolates were tested for susceptibility to 12 antimicrobials. Overall, <i>E. coli</i> isolated from urban area was significantly more likely to be resistant than those isolated from rural area. The human domain of the area had a significantly higher prevalence of AMR <i>E. coli</i>, but it was not significantly different in urban (98%) and rural (97%) areas. AMR <i>E. coli</i> isolated from dairy animals, wild animals and water was significantly higher in the urban area compared with the rural area. There was no significant difference in the proportion of multidrug resistance (MDR) <i>E. coli</i> isolated from humans, wild animals and water between the two study sites. Resistant isolates found from water and wild animals suggest contamination of the environment. A multi-sectorial One Health approach is urgently needed to control the spread of AMR and prevent the occurrences of AMR in Sri Lanka.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoonoses and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"84-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/zph.13087\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoonoses and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zph.13087\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoonoses and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zph.13087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antibiotic resistance through the lens of One Health: A study from an urban and a rural area in Sri Lanka
This study aimed to investigate and compare the proportion of AMR Escherichia coli (E. coli) between urban (Dompe in the Western province) and rural (Dambana in the Sabaragamuwa province) areas in Sri Lanka. The overall hypothesis of the study is that there is a difference in the proportion of AMR E. coli between the urban and the rural areas. Faecal samples were collected from healthy humans (n = 109), dairy animals (n = 103), poultry (n = 35), wild mammals (n = 81), wild birds (n = 76), soil (n = 80) and water (n = 80) from both areas. A total of 908 E. coli isolates were tested for susceptibility to 12 antimicrobials. Overall, E. coli isolated from urban area was significantly more likely to be resistant than those isolated from rural area. The human domain of the area had a significantly higher prevalence of AMR E. coli, but it was not significantly different in urban (98%) and rural (97%) areas. AMR E. coli isolated from dairy animals, wild animals and water was significantly higher in the urban area compared with the rural area. There was no significant difference in the proportion of multidrug resistance (MDR) E. coli isolated from humans, wild animals and water between the two study sites. Resistant isolates found from water and wild animals suggest contamination of the environment. A multi-sectorial One Health approach is urgently needed to control the spread of AMR and prevent the occurrences of AMR in Sri Lanka.
期刊介绍:
Zoonoses and Public Health brings together veterinary and human health researchers and policy-makers by providing a venue for publishing integrated and global approaches to zoonoses and public health. The Editors will consider papers that focus on timely collaborative and multi-disciplinary research in zoonoses and public health. This journal provides rapid publication of original papers, reviews, and potential discussion papers embracing this collaborative spirit. Papers should advance the scientific knowledge of the sources, transmission, prevention and control of zoonoses and be authored by scientists with expertise in areas such as microbiology, virology, parasitology and epidemiology. Articles that incorporate recent data into new methods, applications, or approaches (e.g. statistical modeling) which enhance public health are strongly encouraged.