Weifeng Xie , Jiake Li , Yiwen Liu , Kai Peng , Ke Zhang
{"title":"基于景观格局的非点源污染控制生态缓冲区评价——以汉江流域为例","authors":"Weifeng Xie , Jiake Li , Yiwen Liu , Kai Peng , Ke Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The deterioration of ecological environment caused by non-point source pollution (NPS) has seriously threatened human health and socioeconomic development. Effective identification of critical source areas and selecting appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for watersheds are the keys to controlling NPS. This paper, using Hanjiang River basin, the vital water source for the South-to-North Water Division, China, as a case study, presents a method for accurate critical source areas dentification according to the spatial distribution characteristics of underlying surface and pollution load by coupling NPS risk index (NPPRI), Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) Model, and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). In this research, ten single and three combined scenarios are set up in the critical source areas, including three non-engineering management practices, two engineering management practices, and five ecological buffer zones. Finally, the effect of BMPs for non-point source pollution is assessed by using landscape pattern theory and information entropy method. Furthermore, the influences of the five ecological buffer zones on the characteristics of landscape in watershed and the response relationship between the landscape pattern and NPS are analyzed. The following findings are obtained: (1) The critical source areas were mainly located in the south-central and southeastern part of the study area, accounting for 35.9 % of the total watershed area, and yielding 54.2 % and 60.7 % of the total nitrogen(TN) and total phosphorus(TP) loads in the watershed; (2) All ecological buffer zones play a positive role in NPS control with an average reduction rate of 32.1 % for TN and 46.7 % for TP, and the control effectiveness for TP are better than that for TN; (3) The deployment of the five ecological buffer zones have a significant impact on the interspersion juxtaposition index (IJI), the connectivity of the “sink” landscape is enhanced, the diversity of the “source” landscape is reduced and the “sink” landscape’s ability of interception is boosted; (4) The calculation result of information entropy shows the highest attribute value of practices in the ecological buffer zones is Buffer 200 m. Overall, the findings serve as a reference for NPS control and water environment management in the watershed and strengthen the feasibility of implementing of BMPs in the watershed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"626 ","pages":"Article 130341"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of ecological buffer zone based on landscape pattern for non-point source pollution control: A case study in Hanjiang River basin, China\",\"authors\":\"Weifeng Xie , Jiake Li , Yiwen Liu , Kai Peng , Ke Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The deterioration of ecological environment caused by non-point source pollution (NPS) has seriously threatened human health and socioeconomic development. Effective identification of critical source areas and selecting appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for watersheds are the keys to controlling NPS. This paper, using Hanjiang River basin, the vital water source for the South-to-North Water Division, China, as a case study, presents a method for accurate critical source areas dentification according to the spatial distribution characteristics of underlying surface and pollution load by coupling NPS risk index (NPPRI), Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) Model, and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). In this research, ten single and three combined scenarios are set up in the critical source areas, including three non-engineering management practices, two engineering management practices, and five ecological buffer zones. Finally, the effect of BMPs for non-point source pollution is assessed by using landscape pattern theory and information entropy method. Furthermore, the influences of the five ecological buffer zones on the characteristics of landscape in watershed and the response relationship between the landscape pattern and NPS are analyzed. The following findings are obtained: (1) The critical source areas were mainly located in the south-central and southeastern part of the study area, accounting for 35.9 % of the total watershed area, and yielding 54.2 % and 60.7 % of the total nitrogen(TN) and total phosphorus(TP) loads in the watershed; (2) All ecological buffer zones play a positive role in NPS control with an average reduction rate of 32.1 % for TN and 46.7 % for TP, and the control effectiveness for TP are better than that for TN; (3) The deployment of the five ecological buffer zones have a significant impact on the interspersion juxtaposition index (IJI), the connectivity of the “sink” landscape is enhanced, the diversity of the “source” landscape is reduced and the “sink” landscape’s ability of interception is boosted; (4) The calculation result of information entropy shows the highest attribute value of practices in the ecological buffer zones is Buffer 200 m. Overall, the findings serve as a reference for NPS control and water environment management in the watershed and strengthen the feasibility of implementing of BMPs in the watershed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"626 \",\"pages\":\"Article 130341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169423012830\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169423012830","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of ecological buffer zone based on landscape pattern for non-point source pollution control: A case study in Hanjiang River basin, China
The deterioration of ecological environment caused by non-point source pollution (NPS) has seriously threatened human health and socioeconomic development. Effective identification of critical source areas and selecting appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for watersheds are the keys to controlling NPS. This paper, using Hanjiang River basin, the vital water source for the South-to-North Water Division, China, as a case study, presents a method for accurate critical source areas dentification according to the spatial distribution characteristics of underlying surface and pollution load by coupling NPS risk index (NPPRI), Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) Model, and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). In this research, ten single and three combined scenarios are set up in the critical source areas, including three non-engineering management practices, two engineering management practices, and five ecological buffer zones. Finally, the effect of BMPs for non-point source pollution is assessed by using landscape pattern theory and information entropy method. Furthermore, the influences of the five ecological buffer zones on the characteristics of landscape in watershed and the response relationship between the landscape pattern and NPS are analyzed. The following findings are obtained: (1) The critical source areas were mainly located in the south-central and southeastern part of the study area, accounting for 35.9 % of the total watershed area, and yielding 54.2 % and 60.7 % of the total nitrogen(TN) and total phosphorus(TP) loads in the watershed; (2) All ecological buffer zones play a positive role in NPS control with an average reduction rate of 32.1 % for TN and 46.7 % for TP, and the control effectiveness for TP are better than that for TN; (3) The deployment of the five ecological buffer zones have a significant impact on the interspersion juxtaposition index (IJI), the connectivity of the “sink” landscape is enhanced, the diversity of the “source” landscape is reduced and the “sink” landscape’s ability of interception is boosted; (4) The calculation result of information entropy shows the highest attribute value of practices in the ecological buffer zones is Buffer 200 m. Overall, the findings serve as a reference for NPS control and water environment management in the watershed and strengthen the feasibility of implementing of BMPs in the watershed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.