组织流言的悖论构成视角

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Reviews Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12345
James Greenslade-Yeats, Helena Cooper-Thomas, Patricia D. Corner, Rachel Morrison
{"title":"组织流言的悖论构成视角","authors":"James Greenslade-Yeats,&nbsp;Helena Cooper-Thomas,&nbsp;Patricia D. Corner,&nbsp;Rachel Morrison","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We review cross-disciplinary research on gossip and integrate it with two streams of theoretical scholarship: paradox theory and the communicative constitution of organization (CCO) perspective. In doing so, we develop what we label a paradox-constitutive perspective of organizational gossip. Our perspective holds that gossip does not merely <i>reflect</i> or <i>reveal</i> organizational paradoxes but contributes to <i>constituting</i> them. Drawing on an extensive narrative literature review (<i>N</i> = 184), we conceptualize organizational gossip as a socially constructed category of interpersonal communication that, paradoxically, is regarded as both an exceptionally reliable and exceptionally unreliable source of social information. In turn, we illustrate how this contradictory view of gossip engenders paradoxical tensions when gossip surfaces in organizational life, and we illuminate two specific tensions to which gossip contributes: resistance-authority tensions and inclusion-exclusion tensions. Our work has important implications for research on organizational gossip, paradox, and communication and suggests intriguing directions for future investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"26 2","pages":"187-210"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.12345","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A paradox-constitutive perspective of organizational gossip\",\"authors\":\"James Greenslade-Yeats,&nbsp;Helena Cooper-Thomas,&nbsp;Patricia D. Corner,&nbsp;Rachel Morrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijmr.12345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We review cross-disciplinary research on gossip and integrate it with two streams of theoretical scholarship: paradox theory and the communicative constitution of organization (CCO) perspective. In doing so, we develop what we label a paradox-constitutive perspective of organizational gossip. Our perspective holds that gossip does not merely <i>reflect</i> or <i>reveal</i> organizational paradoxes but contributes to <i>constituting</i> them. Drawing on an extensive narrative literature review (<i>N</i> = 184), we conceptualize organizational gossip as a socially constructed category of interpersonal communication that, paradoxically, is regarded as both an exceptionally reliable and exceptionally unreliable source of social information. In turn, we illustrate how this contradictory view of gossip engenders paradoxical tensions when gossip surfaces in organizational life, and we illuminate two specific tensions to which gossip contributes: resistance-authority tensions and inclusion-exclusion tensions. Our work has important implications for research on organizational gossip, paradox, and communication and suggests intriguing directions for future investigations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"187-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.12345\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12345\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们回顾了有关流言蜚语的跨学科研究,并将其与悖论理论和组织交流构成(CCO)视角这两种理论学术流派进行了整合。在此过程中,我们提出了我们称之为 "组织流言的悖论构成视角 "的观点。我们的观点认为,流言蜚语不仅反映或揭示了组织悖论,而且有助于组织悖论的形成。通过广泛的叙事文献回顾(N = 184),我们将组织流言概念化为一种社会建构的人际沟通类别,矛盾的是,它既被视为异常可靠的社会信息来源,也被视为异常不可靠的社会信息来源。进而,我们说明了当流言蜚语出现在组织生活中时,这种矛盾的观点是如何产生矛盾的紧张关系的,并阐明了流言蜚语导致的两种具体紧张关系:抵制-权威紧张关系和包容-排斥紧张关系。我们的研究对组织流言、悖论和沟通的研究具有重要意义,并为未来的研究提出了令人感兴趣的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A paradox-constitutive perspective of organizational gossip

We review cross-disciplinary research on gossip and integrate it with two streams of theoretical scholarship: paradox theory and the communicative constitution of organization (CCO) perspective. In doing so, we develop what we label a paradox-constitutive perspective of organizational gossip. Our perspective holds that gossip does not merely reflect or reveal organizational paradoxes but contributes to constituting them. Drawing on an extensive narrative literature review (N = 184), we conceptualize organizational gossip as a socially constructed category of interpersonal communication that, paradoxically, is regarded as both an exceptionally reliable and exceptionally unreliable source of social information. In turn, we illustrate how this contradictory view of gossip engenders paradoxical tensions when gossip surfaces in organizational life, and we illuminate two specific tensions to which gossip contributes: resistance-authority tensions and inclusion-exclusion tensions. Our work has important implications for research on organizational gossip, paradox, and communication and suggests intriguing directions for future investigations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
期刊最新文献
Uncovering the impact of digital technologies on strategising: Evidence from a systematic literature review One name for two concepts: A systematic literature review about meta‐organizations Career success and geographical location: A systematic review and future research agenda Towards a heuristic view of managerial heuristics: Integrating divergent perspectives The good, the bad and the evil: A unified conceptualization of negative leadership behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1