STANDARDTM M10严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型检测作为鼻咽或口咽拭子样本中严重急性呼吸系综合征冠状病毒的诊断工具的评估

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of clinical virology plus Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100129
Maria-Eleni Parakatselaki, Georgia Alexi, Alexandros Zafiropoulos, George Sourvinos
{"title":"STANDARDTM M10严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型检测作为鼻咽或口咽拭子样本中严重急性呼吸系综合征冠状病毒的诊断工具的评估","authors":"Maria-Eleni Parakatselaki,&nbsp;Georgia Alexi,&nbsp;Alexandros Zafiropoulos,&nbsp;George Sourvinos","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to an urgent need for rapid diagnostic testing in order to inform timely patients’ management. This study aimed to assess the performance of the STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19. A total of 400 nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs were tested against a reference real-time RT-PCR, including 200 positive samples spanning the full range of observed Ct values. The sensitivity of the STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay was 98.00% (95% CI 94.96% to 99.45%, 196/200), while the specificity was also estimated at 97.50% (95% CI 94.26% to 99.18%, 195/200). The assay proved highly efficient for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, even in samples with low viral load (Ct&gt;25), presenting lower Ct values compared to the reference method. We concluded that the STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay has a similar performance compared to the reference method and other molecular point-of-care assays and can be a valuable tool for rapid and accurate diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of STANDARDTM M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab samples\",\"authors\":\"Maria-Eleni Parakatselaki,&nbsp;Georgia Alexi,&nbsp;Alexandros Zafiropoulos,&nbsp;George Sourvinos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to an urgent need for rapid diagnostic testing in order to inform timely patients’ management. This study aimed to assess the performance of the STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19. A total of 400 nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs were tested against a reference real-time RT-PCR, including 200 positive samples spanning the full range of observed Ct values. The sensitivity of the STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay was 98.00% (95% CI 94.96% to 99.45%, 196/200), while the specificity was also estimated at 97.50% (95% CI 94.26% to 99.18%, 195/200). The assay proved highly efficient for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, even in samples with low viral load (Ct&gt;25), presenting lower Ct values compared to the reference method. We concluded that the STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay has a similar performance compared to the reference method and other molecular point-of-care assays and can be a valuable tool for rapid and accurate diagnosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical virology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型大流行导致迫切需要快速诊断检测,以便及时为患者管理提供信息。本研究旨在评估STANDARD的性能™ M10 SARS-CoV-2检测作为新冠肺炎的诊断工具。共对400个鼻咽或口咽拭子进行了参考实时RT-PCR检测,其中包括200个涵盖观察到的全部Ct值范围的阳性样本。STANDARD的灵敏度™ M10严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型检测为98.00%(95%CI 94.96%至99.45%,196/200),而特异性也估计为97.50%(95%CI 9426%至99.18%,195/200)。该检测方法被证明对检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型非常有效,即使在病毒载量低(Ct>25)的样本中也是如此,与参考方法相比,Ct值更低。我们得出的结论是™ M10严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型检测与参考方法和其他分子护理点检测相比具有相似的性能,是快速准确诊断的有价值工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of STANDARDTM M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab samples

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to an urgent need for rapid diagnostic testing in order to inform timely patients’ management. This study aimed to assess the performance of the STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19. A total of 400 nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs were tested against a reference real-time RT-PCR, including 200 positive samples spanning the full range of observed Ct values. The sensitivity of the STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay was 98.00% (95% CI 94.96% to 99.45%, 196/200), while the specificity was also estimated at 97.50% (95% CI 94.26% to 99.18%, 195/200). The assay proved highly efficient for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, even in samples with low viral load (Ct>25), presenting lower Ct values compared to the reference method. We concluded that the STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay has a similar performance compared to the reference method and other molecular point-of-care assays and can be a valuable tool for rapid and accurate diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical virology plus
Journal of clinical virology plus Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Performance evaluation of the Qiagen BK virus ASR on the NeuMoDx system Environmental surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 for outbreak detection in hospital: A single centre prospective study Correlation of cytokine storm with ocular fundus abnormalities in critically ill patients with severe viral pneumonia A prospective study to evaluate the clinical specificity of the cobas® MPX test kit for screening for HIV RNA, HCV RNA, and HBV DNA in blood donation samples using the cobas® 6800 system in HBV endemic areas A rapid review of the epidemiology and combating strategies of hepatitis C virus infection in Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1