修辞与作文播客——《大修辞播客与教育学》述评

Q1 Arts and Humanities Computers and Composition Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102757
Charles Woods , Shane A. Wood
{"title":"修辞与作文播客——《大修辞播客与教育学》述评","authors":"Charles Woods ,&nbsp;Shane A. Wood","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the last decade, scholar-podcasters have made a case for podcasts as valuable contributions to academic and public discourse, including in rhetoric and composition. Research in multimodality and advances in technology over the past twenty years have allowed rhetoricians and compositionists to develop and (re)imagine ways for making, producing, and distributing knowledge. This review suggests podcasts and podcasting help us do some of the things we value in rhetoric and composition. For example, some recurring themes in rhetoric and writing studies research over the last decade include social justice, antiracism, inclusivity, equity, multimodality, collaboration, and accessibility, to name a few throughlines in scholarship. The Big Rhetorical Podcast and Pedagogue are sites where these disciplinary values are heard. This review suggests that podcasts have the potentiality to do some of the things traditional scholarship has had difficulties rectifying and emphasizes podcasting is a valuable form of knowledge circulation in rhetoric, composition, and adjacent fields. This review seeks to legitimize podcasts as scholarship. One aim was to suggest how podcasts in rhetoric and composition complement values in writing studies and offer new ways of producing and distributing knowledge that reach wider audiences and that have potential to center equity in the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102757"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Podcasts in rhetoric and composition: A review of The Big Rhetorical Podcast and Pedagogue\",\"authors\":\"Charles Woods ,&nbsp;Shane A. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the last decade, scholar-podcasters have made a case for podcasts as valuable contributions to academic and public discourse, including in rhetoric and composition. Research in multimodality and advances in technology over the past twenty years have allowed rhetoricians and compositionists to develop and (re)imagine ways for making, producing, and distributing knowledge. This review suggests podcasts and podcasting help us do some of the things we value in rhetoric and composition. For example, some recurring themes in rhetoric and writing studies research over the last decade include social justice, antiracism, inclusivity, equity, multimodality, collaboration, and accessibility, to name a few throughlines in scholarship. The Big Rhetorical Podcast and Pedagogue are sites where these disciplinary values are heard. This review suggests that podcasts have the potentiality to do some of the things traditional scholarship has had difficulties rectifying and emphasizes podcasting is a valuable form of knowledge circulation in rhetoric, composition, and adjacent fields. This review seeks to legitimize podcasts as scholarship. One aim was to suggest how podcasts in rhetoric and composition complement values in writing studies and offer new ways of producing and distributing knowledge that reach wider audiences and that have potential to center equity in the field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年里,学者播客认为播客对学术和公共话语做出了宝贵贡献,包括在修辞和写作方面。在过去的二十年里,对多模态的研究和技术的进步使修辞学家和合成学家能够发展和(重新)想象制造、生产和传播知识的方法。这篇综述表明,播客和播客帮助我们做一些我们在修辞和写作中重视的事情。例如,在过去十年中,修辞学和写作研究中反复出现的一些主题包括社会正义、反种族主义、包容性、公平、多模式、合作和可及性,仅举几个学术主线。《大修辞播客》和《教育学》是这些学科价值观被听到的地方。这篇综述表明,播客有潜力做一些传统学术难以纠正的事情,并强调播客是修辞、写作和邻近领域知识循环的一种宝贵形式。这篇评论试图将播客合法化为学术。其中一个目的是建议修辞和写作播客如何补充写作研究的价值观,并提供新的生产和传播知识的方式,以接触更广泛的受众,并有可能在该领域集中公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Podcasts in rhetoric and composition: A review of The Big Rhetorical Podcast and Pedagogue

In the last decade, scholar-podcasters have made a case for podcasts as valuable contributions to academic and public discourse, including in rhetoric and composition. Research in multimodality and advances in technology over the past twenty years have allowed rhetoricians and compositionists to develop and (re)imagine ways for making, producing, and distributing knowledge. This review suggests podcasts and podcasting help us do some of the things we value in rhetoric and composition. For example, some recurring themes in rhetoric and writing studies research over the last decade include social justice, antiracism, inclusivity, equity, multimodality, collaboration, and accessibility, to name a few throughlines in scholarship. The Big Rhetorical Podcast and Pedagogue are sites where these disciplinary values are heard. This review suggests that podcasts have the potentiality to do some of the things traditional scholarship has had difficulties rectifying and emphasizes podcasting is a valuable form of knowledge circulation in rhetoric, composition, and adjacent fields. This review seeks to legitimize podcasts as scholarship. One aim was to suggest how podcasts in rhetoric and composition complement values in writing studies and offer new ways of producing and distributing knowledge that reach wider audiences and that have potential to center equity in the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
期刊最新文献
Preparing for a new paradigm: A mixed-methods study of student experience in on-site, hybrid, and online writing courses Integrating generative AI into digital multimodal composition: A study of multicultural second-language classrooms Purposeful remixing with generative AI: Constructing designer voice in multimodal composing Student use of generative AI as a composing process supplement: Concerns for intellectual property and academic honesty Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1