{"title":"重塑以学生为中心的学习:新冠肺炎大流行期间和之后的无障碍和包容性教学大纲设计","authors":"Jianfen Chen , Sarah Hughes , Nupoor Ranade","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper considers how the course syllabus, an often-overlooked document, can function as an instrument for naming and enacting more inclusive, accessible, and learner-centered classrooms. A syllabus is a powerful tool with the potential to make visible the practices and policies of an instructor's pedagogy, to facilitate trust between instructors and students, and to set the tone for a course. Despite the gravity of this document, however, the language and form of written syllabi have tended to be passed down, either institutionally or through generations of instructors, rather than revised and redesigned to meet the needs of students in a changing world. Observing renewed interest in inclusivity and accessibility in pedagogical conversations in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors conducted this study of twelve digital rhetoric syllabi to systematically and precisely analyze the ways language is used to create learner-centered syllabi in service of more just classrooms. The findings demonstrate the need for creating accessible learning experiences for students, showing empathy through various learner-centered tools, and using positive and inclusive language to promote diversity, equity, and social justice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102751"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reimagining student-centered learning: Accessible and inclusive syllabus design during and after the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Jianfen Chen , Sarah Hughes , Nupoor Ranade\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper considers how the course syllabus, an often-overlooked document, can function as an instrument for naming and enacting more inclusive, accessible, and learner-centered classrooms. A syllabus is a powerful tool with the potential to make visible the practices and policies of an instructor's pedagogy, to facilitate trust between instructors and students, and to set the tone for a course. Despite the gravity of this document, however, the language and form of written syllabi have tended to be passed down, either institutionally or through generations of instructors, rather than revised and redesigned to meet the needs of students in a changing world. Observing renewed interest in inclusivity and accessibility in pedagogical conversations in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors conducted this study of twelve digital rhetoric syllabi to systematically and precisely analyze the ways language is used to create learner-centered syllabi in service of more just classrooms. The findings demonstrate the need for creating accessible learning experiences for students, showing empathy through various learner-centered tools, and using positive and inclusive language to promote diversity, equity, and social justice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reimagining student-centered learning: Accessible and inclusive syllabus design during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
This paper considers how the course syllabus, an often-overlooked document, can function as an instrument for naming and enacting more inclusive, accessible, and learner-centered classrooms. A syllabus is a powerful tool with the potential to make visible the practices and policies of an instructor's pedagogy, to facilitate trust between instructors and students, and to set the tone for a course. Despite the gravity of this document, however, the language and form of written syllabi have tended to be passed down, either institutionally or through generations of instructors, rather than revised and redesigned to meet the needs of students in a changing world. Observing renewed interest in inclusivity and accessibility in pedagogical conversations in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors conducted this study of twelve digital rhetoric syllabi to systematically and precisely analyze the ways language is used to create learner-centered syllabi in service of more just classrooms. The findings demonstrate the need for creating accessible learning experiences for students, showing empathy through various learner-centered tools, and using positive and inclusive language to promote diversity, equity, and social justice.
期刊介绍:
Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.