基于监督机器学习模型的碳酸盐岩储层核磁共振孔隙度测井预测

2区 工程技术 Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111169
Hugo Tamoto, Rafael dos Santos Gioria, Cleyton de Carvalho Carneiro
{"title":"基于监督机器学习模型的碳酸盐岩储层核磁共振孔隙度测井预测","authors":"Hugo Tamoto,&nbsp;Rafael dos Santos Gioria,&nbsp;Cleyton de Carvalho Carneiro","doi":"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Porosity estimation is a fundamental input for reservoir management and petrophysical characterization, and this feature is usually estimated based on laboratory measurements or through the use of well-logs. As an important resource for porosity quantification, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) well-logs are extremely useful; they allow geologists and petrophysicists to rapidly quantify different types of porosities (including total, effective, and free fluid porosity), and to perform a full formation evaluation and a reservoir quality analysis. However, the activation of wireline tools, the signal-to-noise ratio, the environmental conditions, and the characteristics of the formation fluid can create expensive and </span>adverse conditions for subsurface acquisition. This research aims to develop machine learning models for the creation of synthetic NMR well-logs, assisted by auxiliary well-logging features. Four supervised models: multilayer </span>perceptron<span> neural network, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and CatBoost, comparing the adjusted R</span></span><sup>2</sup><span> and RMSE<span>. Of these, the CatBoost regressor provided the most highly optimized model. It was able to reduce local dissimilarities with the real dataset, and returned a better global metric score, yielding an adjusted R</span></span><sup>2</sup> of 0.87 and an RMSE of less than 0.01. Moreover, all of the machine learning models provided substantial improvements in total porosity estimation, particularly compared to conventional empirical calculations based on density and sonic well-logs. An improvement of 0.5520 in the adjusted R<sup>2</sup><span> was achieved for the density porosity, and 0.2 for the sonic porosity. The differences between real NMR well-logs and the machine learning outputs were in general less than 5%, for most of the well-logging interval. In addition, a tree boosted porosity model based on well-logs is presented for the first time, and the contributions and impacts of the input features on the model predictions are explored. Finally, the behaviors of the linear and nonlinear features of the model are examined, which allows us to better understand the complex relationships among the features and the dataset used.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":16717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 111169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of nuclear magnetic resonance porosity well-logs in a carbonate reservoir using supervised machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Tamoto,&nbsp;Rafael dos Santos Gioria,&nbsp;Cleyton de Carvalho Carneiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Porosity estimation is a fundamental input for reservoir management and petrophysical characterization, and this feature is usually estimated based on laboratory measurements or through the use of well-logs. As an important resource for porosity quantification, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) well-logs are extremely useful; they allow geologists and petrophysicists to rapidly quantify different types of porosities (including total, effective, and free fluid porosity), and to perform a full formation evaluation and a reservoir quality analysis. However, the activation of wireline tools, the signal-to-noise ratio, the environmental conditions, and the characteristics of the formation fluid can create expensive and </span>adverse conditions for subsurface acquisition. This research aims to develop machine learning models for the creation of synthetic NMR well-logs, assisted by auxiliary well-logging features. Four supervised models: multilayer </span>perceptron<span> neural network, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and CatBoost, comparing the adjusted R</span></span><sup>2</sup><span> and RMSE<span>. Of these, the CatBoost regressor provided the most highly optimized model. It was able to reduce local dissimilarities with the real dataset, and returned a better global metric score, yielding an adjusted R</span></span><sup>2</sup> of 0.87 and an RMSE of less than 0.01. Moreover, all of the machine learning models provided substantial improvements in total porosity estimation, particularly compared to conventional empirical calculations based on density and sonic well-logs. An improvement of 0.5520 in the adjusted R<sup>2</sup><span> was achieved for the density porosity, and 0.2 for the sonic porosity. The differences between real NMR well-logs and the machine learning outputs were in general less than 5%, for most of the well-logging interval. In addition, a tree boosted porosity model based on well-logs is presented for the first time, and the contributions and impacts of the input features on the model predictions are explored. Finally, the behaviors of the linear and nonlinear features of the model are examined, which allows us to better understand the complex relationships among the features and the dataset used.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092041052201021X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092041052201021X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孔隙度估计是储层管理和岩石物理特征的基本输入,通常基于实验室测量或通过使用测井来估计这一特征。核磁共振测井作为孔隙度定量的重要资源,具有极其重要的应用价值;它们使地质学家和岩石物理学家能够快速量化不同类型的孔隙度(包括总孔隙度、有效孔隙度和自由流体孔隙度),并进行完整的地层评估和储层质量分析。然而,电缆工具的激活、信噪比、环境条件和地层流体的特性可能会为地下采集创造昂贵和不利的条件。本研究旨在开发用于创建合成NMR测井的机器学习模型,并辅以辅助测井特征。四个监督模型:多层感知器神经网络、AdaBoost、XGBoost和CatBoost,比较调整后的R2和RMSE。其中,CatBoost回归器提供了优化程度最高的模型。它能够减少与真实数据集的局部差异,并返回更好的全局度量得分,产生0.87的调整后R2和小于0.01的RMSE。此外,所有的机器学习模型都在总孔隙度估计方面提供了实质性的改进,特别是与基于密度和声波测井的传统经验计算相比。密度孔隙率的调整R2提高了0.5520,声波孔隙率提高了0.2。对于大多数测井间隔,真实NMR测井和机器学习输出之间的差异通常小于5%。此外,首次提出了一种基于测井曲线的树增强孔隙度模型,并探讨了输入特征对模型预测的贡献和影响。最后,检查了模型的线性和非线性特征的行为,这使我们能够更好地理解特征与所使用的数据集之间的复杂关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of nuclear magnetic resonance porosity well-logs in a carbonate reservoir using supervised machine learning models

Porosity estimation is a fundamental input for reservoir management and petrophysical characterization, and this feature is usually estimated based on laboratory measurements or through the use of well-logs. As an important resource for porosity quantification, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) well-logs are extremely useful; they allow geologists and petrophysicists to rapidly quantify different types of porosities (including total, effective, and free fluid porosity), and to perform a full formation evaluation and a reservoir quality analysis. However, the activation of wireline tools, the signal-to-noise ratio, the environmental conditions, and the characteristics of the formation fluid can create expensive and adverse conditions for subsurface acquisition. This research aims to develop machine learning models for the creation of synthetic NMR well-logs, assisted by auxiliary well-logging features. Four supervised models: multilayer perceptron neural network, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and CatBoost, comparing the adjusted R2 and RMSE. Of these, the CatBoost regressor provided the most highly optimized model. It was able to reduce local dissimilarities with the real dataset, and returned a better global metric score, yielding an adjusted R2 of 0.87 and an RMSE of less than 0.01. Moreover, all of the machine learning models provided substantial improvements in total porosity estimation, particularly compared to conventional empirical calculations based on density and sonic well-logs. An improvement of 0.5520 in the adjusted R2 was achieved for the density porosity, and 0.2 for the sonic porosity. The differences between real NMR well-logs and the machine learning outputs were in general less than 5%, for most of the well-logging interval. In addition, a tree boosted porosity model based on well-logs is presented for the first time, and the contributions and impacts of the input features on the model predictions are explored. Finally, the behaviors of the linear and nonlinear features of the model are examined, which allows us to better understand the complex relationships among the features and the dataset used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1511
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering, the geology and the science of petroleum and natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of petroleum engineering, natural gas engineering and petroleum (natural gas) geology. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering covers the fields of petroleum (and natural gas) exploration, production and flow in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of petroleum and natural gas; petroleum geochemistry; reservoir engineering; reservoir simulation; rock mechanics; petrophysics; pore-level phenomena; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced oil and gas recovery; petroleum geology; compaction/diagenesis; petroleum economics; drilling and drilling fluids; thermodynamics and phase behavior; fluid mechanics; multi-phase flow in porous media; production engineering; formation evaluation; exploration methods; CO2 Sequestration in geological formations/sub-surface; management and development of unconventional resources such as heavy oil and bitumen, tight oil and liquid rich shales.
期刊最新文献
Predictive Analytical Model for Hydrate Growth Initiation Point in Multiphase Pipeline System Optimization of the Oxidative Desulphurization of Residual Oil Using Hydrogen Peroxide Terpane Characterization of Crude Oils from Niger Delta, Nigeria: A Geochemical Appraisal Editorial Board Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1