深海油气开采资源库位调度方案研究

2区 工程技术 Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111214
Yajie Wang , Jianchun Fan , Shengnan Wu
{"title":"深海油气开采资源库位调度方案研究","authors":"Yajie Wang ,&nbsp;Jianchun Fan ,&nbsp;Shengnan Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Crucial components of the exploration and exploitation of deep-sea oil and gas resources include the identification of pre-disaster emergency resource storage locations and the appropriate scheduling of emergency resources. Frequently, integer linear programming or integer nonlinear programming<span><span> is used to investigate them. Both techniques may result in optimization, but it is difficult to determine the global optimal solution. Consequently, this study presents a two-stage optimization model of emergency resource storage location-scheduling that not only surpasses the limitations of independent research but also applies an intelligent optimization algorithm to discover the global optimal solution. In the first phase of the model, the objective of optimization is to decrease the emergency response time. Uncertainty and unpredictability are incorporated as marine environmental components in the goal function. Using the analytic hierarchy method, the effect of resource storage and location is evaluated, and the genetic algorithm (GA) and immune algorithm (IA) are used to determine the goal model's optimal solution. The objective of the second stage is to optimize resource scheduling satisfaction, and the resource storage locations determined in the first stage are assigned using a fuzzy trigonometric function formula and </span>mathematical programming algorithm. The two-stage optimization methodology is shown using the deep-sea fire explosion incidence as an example. The results suggest that the transit time of resources from the resource storage site selection points to the operation points calculated by GA is 50% less than that obtained by IA, and the 4 time of IA is at least 5 times that of GA. The overall resource scheduling time is lowered by 41.1% compared to conventional shore-based terminals, the economic cost of an accident is minimized, and the life safety of on-site operators is improved. Throughout 1000 different seasons, the objective ideal value and average value of GA and IA are compared. GA has a slower convergence rate than IA, but its convergence quality is much higher. The quantity of emergency supplies given by each resource storage site may meet the resource need of the operational point. We believe that the model proposed in this study can guarantee the accuracy of prediction results in situations of small sample sizes, and its validity and applicability have been validated.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":16717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 111214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the scheduling scheme of resource storage locations in deep-sea oil and gas exploitation\",\"authors\":\"Yajie Wang ,&nbsp;Jianchun Fan ,&nbsp;Shengnan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Crucial components of the exploration and exploitation of deep-sea oil and gas resources include the identification of pre-disaster emergency resource storage locations and the appropriate scheduling of emergency resources. Frequently, integer linear programming or integer nonlinear programming<span><span> is used to investigate them. Both techniques may result in optimization, but it is difficult to determine the global optimal solution. Consequently, this study presents a two-stage optimization model of emergency resource storage location-scheduling that not only surpasses the limitations of independent research but also applies an intelligent optimization algorithm to discover the global optimal solution. In the first phase of the model, the objective of optimization is to decrease the emergency response time. Uncertainty and unpredictability are incorporated as marine environmental components in the goal function. Using the analytic hierarchy method, the effect of resource storage and location is evaluated, and the genetic algorithm (GA) and immune algorithm (IA) are used to determine the goal model's optimal solution. The objective of the second stage is to optimize resource scheduling satisfaction, and the resource storage locations determined in the first stage are assigned using a fuzzy trigonometric function formula and </span>mathematical programming algorithm. The two-stage optimization methodology is shown using the deep-sea fire explosion incidence as an example. The results suggest that the transit time of resources from the resource storage site selection points to the operation points calculated by GA is 50% less than that obtained by IA, and the 4 time of IA is at least 5 times that of GA. The overall resource scheduling time is lowered by 41.1% compared to conventional shore-based terminals, the economic cost of an accident is minimized, and the life safety of on-site operators is improved. Throughout 1000 different seasons, the objective ideal value and average value of GA and IA are compared. GA has a slower convergence rate than IA, but its convergence quality is much higher. The quantity of emergency supplies given by each resource storage site may meet the resource need of the operational point. We believe that the model proposed in this study can guarantee the accuracy of prediction results in situations of small sample sizes, and its validity and applicability have been validated.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092041052201066X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092041052201066X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深海石油和天然气资源勘探和开采的关键组成部分包括确定灾前应急资源储存地点和适当安排应急资源。通常使用整数线性规划或整数非线性规划来研究它们。这两种技术都可能导致优化,但很难确定全局最优解。因此,本研究提出了一个应急资源存储位置调度的两阶段优化模型,该模型不仅超越了独立研究的局限性,而且应用智能优化算法来发现全局最优解。在模型的第一阶段,优化的目标是减少应急响应时间。不确定性和不可预测性作为海洋环境的组成部分纳入目标函数。利用层次分析法对资源存储和定位的效果进行了评价,并利用遗传算法和免疫算法确定了目标模型的最优解。第二阶段的目标是优化资源调度满意度,并使用模糊三角函数公式和数学规划算法分配第一阶段确定的资源存储位置。以深海火灾爆炸发生率为例,给出了两阶段优化方法。结果表明,GA计算的资源从资源储存选址点到作业点的运输时间比IA少50%,IA的4次运输时间至少是GA的5倍。与传统岸基码头相比,总体资源调度时间降低了41.1%,事故经济成本降至最低,提高了现场作业人员的生命安全。在1000个不同季节,比较了GA和IA的客观理想值和平均值。GA的收敛速度比IA慢,但其收敛质量要高得多。每个资源储存点提供的应急物资数量可以满足作战点的资源需求。我们相信,本研究提出的模型能够保证小样本情况下预测结果的准确性,其有效性和适用性已经得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research on the scheduling scheme of resource storage locations in deep-sea oil and gas exploitation

Crucial components of the exploration and exploitation of deep-sea oil and gas resources include the identification of pre-disaster emergency resource storage locations and the appropriate scheduling of emergency resources. Frequently, integer linear programming or integer nonlinear programming is used to investigate them. Both techniques may result in optimization, but it is difficult to determine the global optimal solution. Consequently, this study presents a two-stage optimization model of emergency resource storage location-scheduling that not only surpasses the limitations of independent research but also applies an intelligent optimization algorithm to discover the global optimal solution. In the first phase of the model, the objective of optimization is to decrease the emergency response time. Uncertainty and unpredictability are incorporated as marine environmental components in the goal function. Using the analytic hierarchy method, the effect of resource storage and location is evaluated, and the genetic algorithm (GA) and immune algorithm (IA) are used to determine the goal model's optimal solution. The objective of the second stage is to optimize resource scheduling satisfaction, and the resource storage locations determined in the first stage are assigned using a fuzzy trigonometric function formula and mathematical programming algorithm. The two-stage optimization methodology is shown using the deep-sea fire explosion incidence as an example. The results suggest that the transit time of resources from the resource storage site selection points to the operation points calculated by GA is 50% less than that obtained by IA, and the 4 time of IA is at least 5 times that of GA. The overall resource scheduling time is lowered by 41.1% compared to conventional shore-based terminals, the economic cost of an accident is minimized, and the life safety of on-site operators is improved. Throughout 1000 different seasons, the objective ideal value and average value of GA and IA are compared. GA has a slower convergence rate than IA, but its convergence quality is much higher. The quantity of emergency supplies given by each resource storage site may meet the resource need of the operational point. We believe that the model proposed in this study can guarantee the accuracy of prediction results in situations of small sample sizes, and its validity and applicability have been validated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1511
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering, the geology and the science of petroleum and natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of petroleum engineering, natural gas engineering and petroleum (natural gas) geology. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering covers the fields of petroleum (and natural gas) exploration, production and flow in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of petroleum and natural gas; petroleum geochemistry; reservoir engineering; reservoir simulation; rock mechanics; petrophysics; pore-level phenomena; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced oil and gas recovery; petroleum geology; compaction/diagenesis; petroleum economics; drilling and drilling fluids; thermodynamics and phase behavior; fluid mechanics; multi-phase flow in porous media; production engineering; formation evaluation; exploration methods; CO2 Sequestration in geological formations/sub-surface; management and development of unconventional resources such as heavy oil and bitumen, tight oil and liquid rich shales.
期刊最新文献
Predictive Analytical Model for Hydrate Growth Initiation Point in Multiphase Pipeline System Optimization of the Oxidative Desulphurization of Residual Oil Using Hydrogen Peroxide Terpane Characterization of Crude Oils from Niger Delta, Nigeria: A Geochemical Appraisal Editorial Board Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1