高速铁路效率基准及其决定因素:对中国的借鉴

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Research in Transportation Economics Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101355
Yueqi Zong , Jianhong Wu , Kemei Yu , Xutao Yang
{"title":"高速铁路效率基准及其决定因素:对中国的借鉴","authors":"Yueqi Zong ,&nbsp;Jianhong Wu ,&nbsp;Kemei Yu ,&nbsp;Xutao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The high-speed railway (HSR) performance has drawn considerable attention from international scholars and policymakers. One heatedly-discussed topic is measuring HSR efficiency and its important determinants, particularly HSR organizational structures. The main contribution of our research is the adoption of the multi-stage Network </span>Data Envelopment Analysis<span> (DEA) and Tobit Model, which provides a rational and coherent method to address this issue.</span></p><p>We select the dataset from main HSR countries during the period of 2009–2018, and rank the efficiency of HSRs of different countries. Subsequently we examine the relationship between HSR efficiency and characteristic determinants, along with geographical and economic indicators that may influence the model.</p><p>The results have revealed the HSR productivity difference do exist among countries. Overall, Asia's HSR systems demonstrate higher efficiency compared to those in Europe; while China's HSR efficiency ranks medium in the HSR multi-stages chain but higher in the service stage. Furthermore, the determinants of organizational structure can significantly effect on the effectiveness of HSR systems under a certain transport density threshold. In conclusion, regulators and operators should endeavor to increase traffic by meeting the demand to improve system efficiency. For China, focusing on vertical integration should be the key aspect of future HSR reform.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 101355"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency benchmarking and its determinants in high-speed railways: Reference for China\",\"authors\":\"Yueqi Zong ,&nbsp;Jianhong Wu ,&nbsp;Kemei Yu ,&nbsp;Xutao Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The high-speed railway (HSR) performance has drawn considerable attention from international scholars and policymakers. One heatedly-discussed topic is measuring HSR efficiency and its important determinants, particularly HSR organizational structures. The main contribution of our research is the adoption of the multi-stage Network </span>Data Envelopment Analysis<span> (DEA) and Tobit Model, which provides a rational and coherent method to address this issue.</span></p><p>We select the dataset from main HSR countries during the period of 2009–2018, and rank the efficiency of HSRs of different countries. Subsequently we examine the relationship between HSR efficiency and characteristic determinants, along with geographical and economic indicators that may influence the model.</p><p>The results have revealed the HSR productivity difference do exist among countries. Overall, Asia's HSR systems demonstrate higher efficiency compared to those in Europe; while China's HSR efficiency ranks medium in the HSR multi-stages chain but higher in the service stage. Furthermore, the determinants of organizational structure can significantly effect on the effectiveness of HSR systems under a certain transport density threshold. In conclusion, regulators and operators should endeavor to increase traffic by meeting the demand to improve system efficiency. For China, focusing on vertical integration should be the key aspect of future HSR reform.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885923000951\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885923000951","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高速铁路(HSR)的性能引起了国际学者和政策制定者的极大关注。一个热门话题是衡量高铁效率及其重要决定因素,特别是高铁组织结构。我们研究的主要贡献是采用了多阶段网络数据包络分析(DEA)和Tobit模型,为解决这一问题提供了一种合理而连贯的方法。我们选择了2009-2018年期间主要高铁国家的数据集,并对不同国家的高铁效率进行了排名。随后,我们研究了高铁效率与特征决定因素之间的关系,以及可能影响该模型的地理和经济指标。研究结果表明,高铁生产率在各国之间确实存在差异。总体而言,与欧洲相比,亚洲的高铁系统表现出更高的效率;而中国的高铁效率在高铁多阶段链中排名中等,但在服务阶段排名较高。此外,在一定的运输密度阈值下,组织结构的决定因素会对高铁系统的有效性产生显著影响。总之,监管机构和运营商应该努力通过满足提高系统效率的需求来增加流量。对中国来说,关注垂直一体化应该是未来高铁改革的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency benchmarking and its determinants in high-speed railways: Reference for China

The high-speed railway (HSR) performance has drawn considerable attention from international scholars and policymakers. One heatedly-discussed topic is measuring HSR efficiency and its important determinants, particularly HSR organizational structures. The main contribution of our research is the adoption of the multi-stage Network Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Tobit Model, which provides a rational and coherent method to address this issue.

We select the dataset from main HSR countries during the period of 2009–2018, and rank the efficiency of HSRs of different countries. Subsequently we examine the relationship between HSR efficiency and characteristic determinants, along with geographical and economic indicators that may influence the model.

The results have revealed the HSR productivity difference do exist among countries. Overall, Asia's HSR systems demonstrate higher efficiency compared to those in Europe; while China's HSR efficiency ranks medium in the HSR multi-stages chain but higher in the service stage. Furthermore, the determinants of organizational structure can significantly effect on the effectiveness of HSR systems under a certain transport density threshold. In conclusion, regulators and operators should endeavor to increase traffic by meeting the demand to improve system efficiency. For China, focusing on vertical integration should be the key aspect of future HSR reform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
期刊最新文献
eXplainable DEA approach for evaluating performance of public transport origin-destination pairs Increased ridership and improved affordability: Transforming public transport subsidies in developing contexts Spatial participatory planning for urban logistics: A GIS-enhanced Real-Time Spatial Delphi approach A framework for analyzing service disruptions in last-mile and first-mile reverse logistics Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1