术后更长时间的吸氧剂量不会减少术后恶心和呕吐:一项开放标签临床对照研究

Takehiko Nagaoka , Yoshinori Nakata , Toshiya Shiga , Masahito Takasaki , Tatsuya Yoshimura , Hiroyuki Ito
{"title":"术后更长时间的吸氧剂量不会减少术后恶心和呕吐:一项开放标签临床对照研究","authors":"Takehiko Nagaoka ,&nbsp;Yoshinori Nakata ,&nbsp;Toshiya Shiga ,&nbsp;Masahito Takasaki ,&nbsp;Tatsuya Yoshimura ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Ito","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2023.100357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>From previous studies, “intraoperative” supplemental oxygen did not seem to affect postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, less attention has been directed toward the relationship between “postoperative” oxygen administration and PONV. We have experienced some cases in which PONV was suppressed after oxygen was resupplied, and others in which PONV occurred immediately after stopping oxygen. Therefore, we hypothesized that administering oxygen postoperatively should have an antiemetic effect, and that longer postoperative oxygen administration should reduce PONV.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study is a single-center, open label, and quasi-randomized controlled trial. Participants were patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. They were randomly allocated to either a 1 h (1H) group or 5 h (5H) group according to their hospital ID number. The 1H group received oxygen for 1 h postoperatively; the 5H group received oxygen for 5 h. We investigated whether the duration of postoperative oxygen affects the likelihood of PONV under propofol-based general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the difference in overall incidence of nausea between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After excluding 168 patients before and after allocation, 628 patients for 1H patients and 588 patients for 5H were followed up and analyzed. The incidence of nausea was 44.1 % in the 1H group and 45.2 % in the 5H group (<em>p</em> = 0.73). No significant difference in early or late PONV was observed between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Longer-duration postoperative oxygen administration did not reduce the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longer oxygen administration after surgery dose not reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting: An open label, clinical controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Takehiko Nagaoka ,&nbsp;Yoshinori Nakata ,&nbsp;Toshiya Shiga ,&nbsp;Masahito Takasaki ,&nbsp;Tatsuya Yoshimura ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcorm.2023.100357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>From previous studies, “intraoperative” supplemental oxygen did not seem to affect postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, less attention has been directed toward the relationship between “postoperative” oxygen administration and PONV. We have experienced some cases in which PONV was suppressed after oxygen was resupplied, and others in which PONV occurred immediately after stopping oxygen. Therefore, we hypothesized that administering oxygen postoperatively should have an antiemetic effect, and that longer postoperative oxygen administration should reduce PONV.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study is a single-center, open label, and quasi-randomized controlled trial. Participants were patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. They were randomly allocated to either a 1 h (1H) group or 5 h (5H) group according to their hospital ID number. The 1H group received oxygen for 1 h postoperatively; the 5H group received oxygen for 5 h. We investigated whether the duration of postoperative oxygen affects the likelihood of PONV under propofol-based general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the difference in overall incidence of nausea between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After excluding 168 patients before and after allocation, 628 patients for 1H patients and 588 patients for 5H were followed up and analyzed. The incidence of nausea was 44.1 % in the 1H group and 45.2 % in the 5H group (<em>p</em> = 0.73). No significant difference in early or late PONV was observed between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Longer-duration postoperative oxygen administration did not reduce the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603023000523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603023000523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景根据先前的研究,“术中”补充氧气似乎不会影响术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)。然而,很少有人关注“术后”给氧与PONV之间的关系。我们经历过一些情况,在重新供应氧气后PONV被抑制,而另一些情况下,PONV在停止氧气后立即发生。因此,我们假设术后吸氧应该有止吐作用,术后更长时间的吸氧应该会减少PONV。方法本研究是一项单中心、开放标签、准随机对照试验。参与者是接受腹腔镜妇科手术的患者。根据他们的医院ID号,他们被随机分配到1小时(1H)组或5小时(5H)组。1H组术后吸氧1H;5H组吸氧5小时。我们研究了丙泊酚全麻下术后吸氧时间是否影响PONV的可能性。主要结果是两组恶心总发生率的差异。结果在排除168例分配前后的患者后,对628例1H患者和588例5H患者进行了随访和分析。1H组的恶心发生率为44.1%,5H组为45.2%(p=0.73)。两组之间的早期或晚期PONV没有观察到显著差异。结论腹腔镜妇科手术患者术后较长时间的吸氧并不能降低PONV的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Longer oxygen administration after surgery dose not reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting: An open label, clinical controlled study

Background

From previous studies, “intraoperative” supplemental oxygen did not seem to affect postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, less attention has been directed toward the relationship between “postoperative” oxygen administration and PONV. We have experienced some cases in which PONV was suppressed after oxygen was resupplied, and others in which PONV occurred immediately after stopping oxygen. Therefore, we hypothesized that administering oxygen postoperatively should have an antiemetic effect, and that longer postoperative oxygen administration should reduce PONV.

Methods

This study is a single-center, open label, and quasi-randomized controlled trial. Participants were patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. They were randomly allocated to either a 1 h (1H) group or 5 h (5H) group according to their hospital ID number. The 1H group received oxygen for 1 h postoperatively; the 5H group received oxygen for 5 h. We investigated whether the duration of postoperative oxygen affects the likelihood of PONV under propofol-based general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the difference in overall incidence of nausea between the two groups.

Results

After excluding 168 patients before and after allocation, 628 patients for 1H patients and 588 patients for 5H were followed up and analyzed. The incidence of nausea was 44.1 % in the 1H group and 45.2 % in the 5H group (p = 0.73). No significant difference in early or late PONV was observed between the groups.

Conclusions

Longer-duration postoperative oxygen administration did not reduce the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
期刊最新文献
A study of the relationship between professional autonomy and professional quality of life among operating room personnel: A cross-sectional study Postoperative mechanical ventilation after corrective Tetralogy of Fallot surgery in infants: Assessment of perioperative factors and radiographic severity scores Compliance evaluation in post-anesthesia care units at teaching hospitals in Alborz Province, Iran Anaesthetic management of caesarean section in a primigravida with pre-eclampsia, pleural effusion, consolidation, and lung collapse – a case report The effect of surgical smoke on operating room workers, attitudes towards risks, and the implementation of preventive measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1