分层方法:创新肝移植多模式定性研究

Chloe Wong-Mersereau , Fraser Allen Best , Lia Tarachansky , Shabnam Sukhdev , Mary Bunch , Alexandra Frankel , Brad Necyk , Kelly Fritsch , Suze Berkhout
{"title":"分层方法:创新肝移植多模式定性研究","authors":"Chloe Wong-Mersereau ,&nbsp;Fraser Allen Best ,&nbsp;Lia Tarachansky ,&nbsp;Shabnam Sukhdev ,&nbsp;Mary Bunch ,&nbsp;Alexandra Frankel ,&nbsp;Brad Necyk ,&nbsp;Kelly Fritsch ,&nbsp;Suze Berkhout","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2023.100183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is a growing interest in qualitative methodologies for understanding complexities in the lived experience of liver transplantation. Frequently, such studies explore quality of life and offer insights for integrating patient-oriented outcomes into conventional research strategies. The scope of qualitative research in liver transplantation tends to be limited, however, with respect to engagement with critical theories, leaving certain aspects of lived experience unexamined.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The authors describe the process of layering multiple modes of critical qualitative research in liver transplantation, exploring how experiences in liver transplantation are structured discursively and what aspects of recipients’ stories are not easily spoken or shared. This study pairs a critical discourse analysis of patient manuals from a Canadian liver transplant program with digital storytelling with liver transplant recipients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A homogenous narrative emerges from patient manuals that does not adequately capture the complexity of lived experience of liver transplant survivors. Digital storytelling opens new narrative possibilities by layering sensory aspects of the transplant experience, which are often difficult to articulate through words. This complicates common ideas of survivorship, who is considered a “good” patient, and the cultural scripts that transplant stories frequently engage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Critical qualitative research offers opportunities for understanding structures of power embedded within biomedical transplant narratives. Layering qualitative and arts-based methodologies within a framework of co-creation can shift knowledge/power relations while also intervening through material-discursive practices to offer novel insights and opportunities for critical reflection on transplant experiences for recipients, families, and healthcare providers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Layered Methodologies: Innovating Multimodal Qualitative Research in Liver Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Wong-Mersereau ,&nbsp;Fraser Allen Best ,&nbsp;Lia Tarachansky ,&nbsp;Shabnam Sukhdev ,&nbsp;Mary Bunch ,&nbsp;Alexandra Frankel ,&nbsp;Brad Necyk ,&nbsp;Kelly Fritsch ,&nbsp;Suze Berkhout\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.liver.2023.100183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is a growing interest in qualitative methodologies for understanding complexities in the lived experience of liver transplantation. Frequently, such studies explore quality of life and offer insights for integrating patient-oriented outcomes into conventional research strategies. The scope of qualitative research in liver transplantation tends to be limited, however, with respect to engagement with critical theories, leaving certain aspects of lived experience unexamined.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The authors describe the process of layering multiple modes of critical qualitative research in liver transplantation, exploring how experiences in liver transplantation are structured discursively and what aspects of recipients’ stories are not easily spoken or shared. This study pairs a critical discourse analysis of patient manuals from a Canadian liver transplant program with digital storytelling with liver transplant recipients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A homogenous narrative emerges from patient manuals that does not adequately capture the complexity of lived experience of liver transplant survivors. Digital storytelling opens new narrative possibilities by layering sensory aspects of the transplant experience, which are often difficult to articulate through words. This complicates common ideas of survivorship, who is considered a “good” patient, and the cultural scripts that transplant stories frequently engage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Critical qualitative research offers opportunities for understanding structures of power embedded within biomedical transplant narratives. Layering qualitative and arts-based methodologies within a framework of co-creation can shift knowledge/power relations while also intervening through material-discursive practices to offer novel insights and opportunities for critical reflection on transplant experiences for recipients, families, and healthcare providers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967623000454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967623000454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景人们对了解肝移植生活经历复杂性的定性方法越来越感兴趣。此类研究经常探索生活质量,并为将以患者为导向的结果纳入传统研究策略提供见解。然而,在参与批判性理论方面,肝移植的定性研究范围往往是有限的,生活经验的某些方面没有得到检验。方法作者描述了肝移植中多种关键定性研究模式的分层过程,探讨了肝移植的经验是如何被结构化的,以及接受者的故事中哪些方面不容易被说出或分享。这项研究将加拿大肝移植项目患者手册的批判性话语分析与肝移植受者的数字故事相结合。结果患者手册中出现了同质的叙述,没有充分捕捉到肝移植幸存者生活经历的复杂性。数字故事通过对移植体验的感官方面进行分层,开启了新的叙事可能性,而这些感官方面通常很难通过语言表达出来。这使幸存者的常见观念变得复杂,幸存者被认为是一个“好”患者,移植故事经常涉及的文化脚本也变得复杂。结论批判性定性研究为理解生物医学移植叙事中的权力结构提供了机会。在共同创造的框架内分层的定性和基于艺术的方法可以改变知识/权力关系,同时也可以通过物质话语实践进行干预,为接受者、家庭和医疗保健提供者提供新的见解和机会,对移植经历进行批判性反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Layered Methodologies: Innovating Multimodal Qualitative Research in Liver Transplantation

Background

There is a growing interest in qualitative methodologies for understanding complexities in the lived experience of liver transplantation. Frequently, such studies explore quality of life and offer insights for integrating patient-oriented outcomes into conventional research strategies. The scope of qualitative research in liver transplantation tends to be limited, however, with respect to engagement with critical theories, leaving certain aspects of lived experience unexamined.

Methods

The authors describe the process of layering multiple modes of critical qualitative research in liver transplantation, exploring how experiences in liver transplantation are structured discursively and what aspects of recipients’ stories are not easily spoken or shared. This study pairs a critical discourse analysis of patient manuals from a Canadian liver transplant program with digital storytelling with liver transplant recipients.

Results

A homogenous narrative emerges from patient manuals that does not adequately capture the complexity of lived experience of liver transplant survivors. Digital storytelling opens new narrative possibilities by layering sensory aspects of the transplant experience, which are often difficult to articulate through words. This complicates common ideas of survivorship, who is considered a “good” patient, and the cultural scripts that transplant stories frequently engage.

Conclusion

Critical qualitative research offers opportunities for understanding structures of power embedded within biomedical transplant narratives. Layering qualitative and arts-based methodologies within a framework of co-creation can shift knowledge/power relations while also intervening through material-discursive practices to offer novel insights and opportunities for critical reflection on transplant experiences for recipients, families, and healthcare providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Technical refinements to reduce the early biliary complication in living donor liver transplantation Daratumumab as a rescue therapy for antibody-mediated rejection in super-urgent ABO-incompatible pediatric liver transplantation The effects of underlying inflammatory bowel disease on the outcomes of primary sclerosing cholangitis liver transplant recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1