{"title":"弥合图书馆学研究与实践的差距:图书馆学会的中介作用探析","authors":"Wei Feng, Lihong Zhou, Di Wang, Qinggong Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The advancement of librarianship requires close communication and collaboration between research and practice communities. A long-standing divide between the two communities in China exists and has been exacerbated in recent years. The role of the Library Society of China (LSC) in mediating the gap and encouraging collaboration was explored. A case study approach was adopted, with a total of twelve library researchers and practitioners interviewed using semi-structured interview scripts. A thematic analysis of the interview data pointed to eleven critical factors clustered into three main themes: identity creation, relationship building, and group practice. Conceptualization of the findings indicated that practical strategies can be formulated for three prioritized critical factors: identity acceptance, mutual engagement, and continuous dialogue. Although the case setting was the LSC, the findings may provide useful indications and insights for library societies in other countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"45 4","pages":"Article 101267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the research-practice gap in librarianship: Exploring the mediating role of library societies\",\"authors\":\"Wei Feng, Lihong Zhou, Di Wang, Qinggong Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The advancement of librarianship requires close communication and collaboration between research and practice communities. A long-standing divide between the two communities in China exists and has been exacerbated in recent years. The role of the Library Society of China (LSC) in mediating the gap and encouraging collaboration was explored. A case study approach was adopted, with a total of twelve library researchers and practitioners interviewed using semi-structured interview scripts. A thematic analysis of the interview data pointed to eleven critical factors clustered into three main themes: identity creation, relationship building, and group practice. Conceptualization of the findings indicated that practical strategies can be formulated for three prioritized critical factors: identity acceptance, mutual engagement, and continuous dialogue. Although the case setting was the LSC, the findings may provide useful indications and insights for library societies in other countries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Library & Information Science Research\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Library & Information Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818823000439\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library & Information Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818823000439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bridging the research-practice gap in librarianship: Exploring the mediating role of library societies
The advancement of librarianship requires close communication and collaboration between research and practice communities. A long-standing divide between the two communities in China exists and has been exacerbated in recent years. The role of the Library Society of China (LSC) in mediating the gap and encouraging collaboration was explored. A case study approach was adopted, with a total of twelve library researchers and practitioners interviewed using semi-structured interview scripts. A thematic analysis of the interview data pointed to eleven critical factors clustered into three main themes: identity creation, relationship building, and group practice. Conceptualization of the findings indicated that practical strategies can be formulated for three prioritized critical factors: identity acceptance, mutual engagement, and continuous dialogue. Although the case setting was the LSC, the findings may provide useful indications and insights for library societies in other countries.
期刊介绍:
Library & Information Science Research, a cross-disciplinary and refereed journal, focuses on the research process in library and information science as well as research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance. All papers are subject to a double-blind reviewing process.