非洲中新世类人猿的生态极性

Gregory J. Retallack
{"title":"非洲中新世类人猿的生态极性","authors":"Gregory J. Retallack","doi":"10.1016/j.eve.2023.100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Humans have been considered ecologically unspecialized, and our evolution a compromise path through a maze of conflicting influences. Generalist ecological roles contrast with ecological polarities such as competitor, breeder or tolerator. Ecological polarities can be approximated in fossil mammals by relative size of canines for competitors, incisors for breeders, and molars for tolerators. Considered in this way, early Miocene apes of Kenya were generalists, but show a greater range of ecological polarity than modern apes, including ecological polarities found in living apes, macaques, and vervets. As many as six primates in a single Miocene aleosol show diverse ecological polarities, implying competitive exclusion. Middle Miocene monkeys and apes were more molarized and marginally more tolerant than early Miocene primates, so more like humans in that respect. This adaptive shift of 15 ​Ma was at a time of climatic aridity and open vegetation indicated by associated paleosols. A 20 ​m.yr record of Kenyan paleoprecipitation from paleosols indicates that 15 ​Ma was unusually dry after exceptionally wet paleoclimate of 16 ​Ma. This new Kenyan paleosol record of paleoclimate is from the same localities as the fossil apes, and uninfluenced by whole ocean mixing, salinity and ice volume effects which compromise similar marine isotopic proxies of global change. Molarization of apes at 15 ​Ma ago was only one of a series of adaptations selected by at least 9 dry alternating with wet episodes which shifted forest to shrubland ecotones over the past 20 ​m.yr. Our evolutionary lineage ran a gauntlet of Neogene climatic and vegetation changes in Africa by adopting a generalist ecological role.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100516,"journal":{"name":"Evolving Earth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological polarities of African Miocene apes\",\"authors\":\"Gregory J. Retallack\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eve.2023.100005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Humans have been considered ecologically unspecialized, and our evolution a compromise path through a maze of conflicting influences. Generalist ecological roles contrast with ecological polarities such as competitor, breeder or tolerator. Ecological polarities can be approximated in fossil mammals by relative size of canines for competitors, incisors for breeders, and molars for tolerators. Considered in this way, early Miocene apes of Kenya were generalists, but show a greater range of ecological polarity than modern apes, including ecological polarities found in living apes, macaques, and vervets. As many as six primates in a single Miocene aleosol show diverse ecological polarities, implying competitive exclusion. Middle Miocene monkeys and apes were more molarized and marginally more tolerant than early Miocene primates, so more like humans in that respect. This adaptive shift of 15 ​Ma was at a time of climatic aridity and open vegetation indicated by associated paleosols. A 20 ​m.yr record of Kenyan paleoprecipitation from paleosols indicates that 15 ​Ma was unusually dry after exceptionally wet paleoclimate of 16 ​Ma. This new Kenyan paleosol record of paleoclimate is from the same localities as the fossil apes, and uninfluenced by whole ocean mixing, salinity and ice volume effects which compromise similar marine isotopic proxies of global change. Molarization of apes at 15 ​Ma ago was only one of a series of adaptations selected by at least 9 dry alternating with wet episodes which shifted forest to shrubland ecotones over the past 20 ​m.yr. Our evolutionary lineage ran a gauntlet of Neogene climatic and vegetation changes in Africa by adopting a generalist ecological role.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolving Earth\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolving Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950117223000055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolving Earth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950117223000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类在生态上被认为是非专业化的,我们的进化是一条通过相互冲突的影响迷宫的折衷之路。广义生态角色与竞争对手、繁殖者或耐受者等生态极性形成对比。哺乳动物化石中的生态极性可以通过竞争对手的犬齿、繁殖者的门牙和耐受者的臼齿的相对大小来近似。从这个角度来看,肯尼亚中新世早期的类人猿是多面手,但比现代类人猿表现出更大的生态极性,包括现存类人猿、猕猴和疣猴的生态极。在一个中新世的一种糊剂中,多达六种灵长类动物表现出不同的生态极性,这意味着竞争排斥。中新世中期的猴子和类人猿比中新世早期的灵长类动物更容易蜕皮,也更宽容,因此在这方面更像人类。这种15的自适应换档​马当时气候干旱,植被开阔,相关的古土壤表明了这一点。A 20​肯尼亚古土壤的多年古降水记录表明​马在16年异常潮湿的古气候之后异常干燥​马。这一新的肯尼亚古气候古土壤记录与类人猿化石来自同一地区,不受整个海洋混合、盐度和冰体积效应的影响,这些影响与全球变化的海洋同位素指标相似。类人猿15岁时的Molarization​在过去的20年里,马戈只是通过至少9次干旱和潮湿交替事件选择的一系列适应中的一次,这些事件将森林转变为灌木林交错带​我们的进化谱系通过扮演广义的生态角色,经受住了非洲新第三纪气候和植被变化的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecological polarities of African Miocene apes

Humans have been considered ecologically unspecialized, and our evolution a compromise path through a maze of conflicting influences. Generalist ecological roles contrast with ecological polarities such as competitor, breeder or tolerator. Ecological polarities can be approximated in fossil mammals by relative size of canines for competitors, incisors for breeders, and molars for tolerators. Considered in this way, early Miocene apes of Kenya were generalists, but show a greater range of ecological polarity than modern apes, including ecological polarities found in living apes, macaques, and vervets. As many as six primates in a single Miocene aleosol show diverse ecological polarities, implying competitive exclusion. Middle Miocene monkeys and apes were more molarized and marginally more tolerant than early Miocene primates, so more like humans in that respect. This adaptive shift of 15 ​Ma was at a time of climatic aridity and open vegetation indicated by associated paleosols. A 20 ​m.yr record of Kenyan paleoprecipitation from paleosols indicates that 15 ​Ma was unusually dry after exceptionally wet paleoclimate of 16 ​Ma. This new Kenyan paleosol record of paleoclimate is from the same localities as the fossil apes, and uninfluenced by whole ocean mixing, salinity and ice volume effects which compromise similar marine isotopic proxies of global change. Molarization of apes at 15 ​Ma ago was only one of a series of adaptations selected by at least 9 dry alternating with wet episodes which shifted forest to shrubland ecotones over the past 20 ​m.yr. Our evolutionary lineage ran a gauntlet of Neogene climatic and vegetation changes in Africa by adopting a generalist ecological role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential of pine forest in controlling soil erosion in Himalayan region - Investigation using fallout radionuclide (137Cs) measurements Bonebed amber deposits: A review of taphonomy and palaeontological significance Reconstruction of avulsion history of the Brahmaputra River: Rare example of a giant braided river course alteration through multi-channel multi-avulsion processes Crystallographic study of vertebrate fossils from the Central Narmada valley, India Phase equilibria constraints on the stability of garnet in mafic granulite: An example from Karimnagar granulite terrain, Eastern Dharwar Craton, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1