行为现实主义对协同虚拟环境中社交互动的影响

Presence Pub Date : 2020-02-17 DOI:10.1162/pres_a_00324
Fernanda Herrera;Soo Youn Oh;Jeremy N. Bailenson
{"title":"行为现实主义对协同虚拟环境中社交互动的影响","authors":"Fernanda Herrera;Soo Youn Oh;Jeremy N. Bailenson","doi":"10.1162/pres_a_00324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<para>Collaborative virtual environments (CVEs), wherein people can virtually interact with each other via avatars, are becoming increasingly prominent. However, CVEs differ in type of avatar representation and level of behavioral realism afforded to users. The present investigation compared the effect of behavioral realism on users' nonverbal behavior, self-presence, social presence, and interpersonal attraction during a dyadic interaction. Fifty-one dyads (aged 18 to 26) embodied either a full-bodied avatar with mapped hands and inferred arm movements, an avatar consisting of only a floating head and mapped hands, or a static full-bodied avatar. Planned contrasts compared the effect of behavioral realism against no behavioral realism, and compared the effect of low versus high behavioral realism. Results show that participants who embodied the avatar with only a floating head and hands experienced greater social presence, self-presence, and interpersonal attraction than participants who embodied a full-bodied avatar with mapped hands. In contrast, there were no significant differences on these measures between participants in the two mapped-hands conditions and those who embodied a static avatar. Participants in the static-avatar condition rotated their own physical head and hands significantly less than participants in the other two conditions during the dyadic interaction. Additionally, side-to-side head movements were negatively correlated with interpersonal attraction regardless of condition. We discuss implications of the finding that behavioral realism influences nonverbal behavior and communication outcomes.</para>","PeriodicalId":101038,"journal":{"name":"Presence","volume":"27 2","pages":"163-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/pres_a_00324","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Behavioral Realism on Social Interactions Inside Collaborative Virtual Environments\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Herrera;Soo Youn Oh;Jeremy N. Bailenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/pres_a_00324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<para>Collaborative virtual environments (CVEs), wherein people can virtually interact with each other via avatars, are becoming increasingly prominent. However, CVEs differ in type of avatar representation and level of behavioral realism afforded to users. The present investigation compared the effect of behavioral realism on users' nonverbal behavior, self-presence, social presence, and interpersonal attraction during a dyadic interaction. Fifty-one dyads (aged 18 to 26) embodied either a full-bodied avatar with mapped hands and inferred arm movements, an avatar consisting of only a floating head and mapped hands, or a static full-bodied avatar. Planned contrasts compared the effect of behavioral realism against no behavioral realism, and compared the effect of low versus high behavioral realism. Results show that participants who embodied the avatar with only a floating head and hands experienced greater social presence, self-presence, and interpersonal attraction than participants who embodied a full-bodied avatar with mapped hands. In contrast, there were no significant differences on these measures between participants in the two mapped-hands conditions and those who embodied a static avatar. Participants in the static-avatar condition rotated their own physical head and hands significantly less than participants in the other two conditions during the dyadic interaction. Additionally, side-to-side head movements were negatively correlated with interpersonal attraction regardless of condition. We discuss implications of the finding that behavioral realism influences nonverbal behavior and communication outcomes.</para>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Presence\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"163-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/pres_a_00324\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Presence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9000812/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Presence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9000812/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

协作虚拟环境(CVE)越来越突出,人们可以通过化身进行虚拟交互。然而,CVE在化身表示的类型和提供给用户的行为真实性水平上有所不同。本研究比较了行为现实主义对用户在二元互动中的非言语行为、自我存在、社交存在和人际吸引力的影响。51个二人组(年龄在18至26岁之间)体现了一个拥有映射的手和推断的手臂动作的丰满化身,一个仅由漂浮的头和映射的手组成的化身,或者一个静态的丰满化身。计划对比比较了行为现实主义和非行为现实主义的效果,并比较了低行为现实主义与高行为现实主义之间的效果。结果显示,与拥有映射手的丰满化身的参与者相比,只拥有浮动头和手的化身的参与者体验到了更大的社交存在、自我存在和人际吸引力。相比之下,在两种映射手部条件下的参与者和体现静态化身的参与者之间,在这些测量上没有显著差异。在二元互动过程中,静态化身条件下的参与者旋转自己的身体头部和双手的次数明显少于其他两种条件下的与会者。此外,无论情况如何,头部左右移动都与人际吸引力呈负相关。我们讨论了行为现实主义影响非言语行为和沟通结果的发现的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Behavioral Realism on Social Interactions Inside Collaborative Virtual Environments
Collaborative virtual environments (CVEs), wherein people can virtually interact with each other via avatars, are becoming increasingly prominent. However, CVEs differ in type of avatar representation and level of behavioral realism afforded to users. The present investigation compared the effect of behavioral realism on users' nonverbal behavior, self-presence, social presence, and interpersonal attraction during a dyadic interaction. Fifty-one dyads (aged 18 to 26) embodied either a full-bodied avatar with mapped hands and inferred arm movements, an avatar consisting of only a floating head and mapped hands, or a static full-bodied avatar. Planned contrasts compared the effect of behavioral realism against no behavioral realism, and compared the effect of low versus high behavioral realism. Results show that participants who embodied the avatar with only a floating head and hands experienced greater social presence, self-presence, and interpersonal attraction than participants who embodied a full-bodied avatar with mapped hands. In contrast, there were no significant differences on these measures between participants in the two mapped-hands conditions and those who embodied a static avatar. Participants in the static-avatar condition rotated their own physical head and hands significantly less than participants in the other two conditions during the dyadic interaction. Additionally, side-to-side head movements were negatively correlated with interpersonal attraction regardless of condition. We discuss implications of the finding that behavioral realism influences nonverbal behavior and communication outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mismatches between 3D Content Acquisition and Perception Cause More Visually Induced Motion Sickness Tokens of Reality: On the Prospective Nature of Virtual Consciousness Bridging the Headset: Engagement, Collaboration, and Learning in and around Virtual Reality How Interaction Techniques Affect Workload in a Virtual Environment During Multitasking Ten Years of Operating a Center with Large-Scale Virtual-Reality Installations: Developments and Learnings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1