使用增强现实开车时打电话:祝福还是诅咒?

Presence Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1162/pres_a_00316
Andrew L. Kun;Hidde van der Meulen;Christian P. Janssen
{"title":"使用增强现实开车时打电话:祝福还是诅咒?","authors":"Andrew L. Kun;Hidde van der Meulen;Christian P. Janssen","doi":"10.1162/pres_a_00316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<para>We report on an experiment on the distracting effects of in-car conversations through augmented-reality glasses. Previous research showed that in-car phone conversations can be distracting, but that the distraction might be reduced if the remote caller receives visual information about the driving context. However, what happens if such video sharing becomes bidirectional? The recent introduction of commercial augmented-reality glasses in particular might allow drivers to engage in video-supported conversations while driving. We investigate how distracting such video-based conversations are in an experiment. Our participants operated a simulated vehicle, while also playing a conversational game (Taboo) with a remote conversant. The driver either only heard the remote conversant (speech-only condition), or was also able to see the remote person in a virtual window that was presented through augmented reality (video call condition). Results show that our participants did not spend time looking at the video of the remote conversant. We hypothesize that this was due to the fact that in our experiment participants had to turn their head to get a full view of the virtual window. Our results imply that we need further studies on the effects of augmented reality on the visual attention of the driver, before the technology is used on the road.</para>","PeriodicalId":101038,"journal":{"name":"Presence","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/pres_a_00316","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calling while Driving Using Augmented Reality: Blessing or Curse?\",\"authors\":\"Andrew L. Kun;Hidde van der Meulen;Christian P. Janssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/pres_a_00316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<para>We report on an experiment on the distracting effects of in-car conversations through augmented-reality glasses. Previous research showed that in-car phone conversations can be distracting, but that the distraction might be reduced if the remote caller receives visual information about the driving context. However, what happens if such video sharing becomes bidirectional? The recent introduction of commercial augmented-reality glasses in particular might allow drivers to engage in video-supported conversations while driving. We investigate how distracting such video-based conversations are in an experiment. Our participants operated a simulated vehicle, while also playing a conversational game (Taboo) with a remote conversant. The driver either only heard the remote conversant (speech-only condition), or was also able to see the remote person in a virtual window that was presented through augmented reality (video call condition). Results show that our participants did not spend time looking at the video of the remote conversant. We hypothesize that this was due to the fact that in our experiment participants had to turn their head to get a full view of the virtual window. Our results imply that we need further studies on the effects of augmented reality on the visual attention of the driver, before the technology is used on the road.</para>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Presence\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/pres_a_00316\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Presence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8685863/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Presence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8685863/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

我们报道了一项关于通过增强现实眼镜进行车内对话的分散注意力效果的实验。先前的研究表明,车内电话交谈可能会分散注意力,但如果远程来电者收到有关驾驶环境的视觉信息,这种分散注意力的情况可能会减少。然而,如果这种视频共享变成双向的,会发生什么?特别是最近推出的商用增强现实眼镜可能会让驾驶员在驾驶时进行视频支持的对话。我们在一项实验中调查了这种基于视频的对话是如何分散注意力的。我们的参与者操作一辆模拟车辆,同时还与一名远程健谈者玩对话游戏(禁忌)。驾驶员要么只听到远程熟悉者的声音(仅限于语音),要么也能够在通过增强现实呈现的虚拟窗口中看到远程人(视频通话条件)。结果显示,我们的参与者没有花时间看远程交谈者的视频。我们假设这是因为在我们的实验中,参与者必须转头才能看到虚拟窗口的全貌。我们的研究结果表明,在增强现实技术在道路上使用之前,我们需要进一步研究增强现实对驾驶员视觉注意力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Calling while Driving Using Augmented Reality: Blessing or Curse?
We report on an experiment on the distracting effects of in-car conversations through augmented-reality glasses. Previous research showed that in-car phone conversations can be distracting, but that the distraction might be reduced if the remote caller receives visual information about the driving context. However, what happens if such video sharing becomes bidirectional? The recent introduction of commercial augmented-reality glasses in particular might allow drivers to engage in video-supported conversations while driving. We investigate how distracting such video-based conversations are in an experiment. Our participants operated a simulated vehicle, while also playing a conversational game (Taboo) with a remote conversant. The driver either only heard the remote conversant (speech-only condition), or was also able to see the remote person in a virtual window that was presented through augmented reality (video call condition). Results show that our participants did not spend time looking at the video of the remote conversant. We hypothesize that this was due to the fact that in our experiment participants had to turn their head to get a full view of the virtual window. Our results imply that we need further studies on the effects of augmented reality on the visual attention of the driver, before the technology is used on the road.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mismatches between 3D Content Acquisition and Perception Cause More Visually Induced Motion Sickness Tokens of Reality: On the Prospective Nature of Virtual Consciousness Bridging the Headset: Engagement, Collaboration, and Learning in and around Virtual Reality How Interaction Techniques Affect Workload in a Virtual Environment During Multitasking Ten Years of Operating a Center with Large-Scale Virtual-Reality Installations: Developments and Learnings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1