机器人速度估计的实验比较

Stefan B. Liu;Andrea Giusti;Matthias Althoff
{"title":"机器人速度估计的实验比较","authors":"Stefan B. Liu;Andrea Giusti;Matthias Althoff","doi":"10.1109/OJCSYS.2022.3222753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate velocity information is often essential to the control of robot manipulators, especially for precise tracking of fast trajectories. However, joint velocities are rarely directly measured and instead estimated to save costs. While many approaches have been proposed for the velocity estimation of robot joints, no comprehensive experimental evaluation exists, making it difficult to choose the appropriate method. This paper compares multiple estimation methods running on a six degrees-of-freedom manipulator. We evaluate: 1) the estimation error using a ground-truth signal, 2) the closed-loop tracking error, 3) convergence behavior, 4) sensor fault tolerance, 5) implementation and tuning effort. To ensure a fair comparison, we optimally tune the estimators using a genetic algorithm. All estimation methods have a similar estimation error and similar closed-loop tracking performance, except for the nonlinear high-gain observer, which is not accurate enough. Sliding-mode observers can provide a precise velocity estimation despite sensor faults.","PeriodicalId":73299,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of control systems","volume":"2 ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/9552933/9973428/09953534.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Velocity Estimation of Robot Manipulators: An Experimental Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Stefan B. Liu;Andrea Giusti;Matthias Althoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJCSYS.2022.3222753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate velocity information is often essential to the control of robot manipulators, especially for precise tracking of fast trajectories. However, joint velocities are rarely directly measured and instead estimated to save costs. While many approaches have been proposed for the velocity estimation of robot joints, no comprehensive experimental evaluation exists, making it difficult to choose the appropriate method. This paper compares multiple estimation methods running on a six degrees-of-freedom manipulator. We evaluate: 1) the estimation error using a ground-truth signal, 2) the closed-loop tracking error, 3) convergence behavior, 4) sensor fault tolerance, 5) implementation and tuning effort. To ensure a fair comparison, we optimally tune the estimators using a genetic algorithm. All estimation methods have a similar estimation error and similar closed-loop tracking performance, except for the nonlinear high-gain observer, which is not accurate enough. Sliding-mode observers can provide a precise velocity estimation despite sensor faults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE open journal of control systems\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/9552933/9973428/09953534.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE open journal of control systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9953534/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of control systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9953534/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

精确的速度信息通常对机器人的控制至关重要,尤其是对快速轨迹的精确跟踪。然而,很少直接测量节理速度,而是估计节理速度以节省成本。虽然已经提出了许多方法来估计机器人关节的速度,但没有全面的实验评估,这使得选择合适的方法变得困难。本文比较了在六自由度机械手上运行的多种估计方法。我们评估:1)使用地面实况信号的估计误差,2)闭环跟踪误差,3)收敛行为,4)传感器容错,5)实现和调整工作。为了确保公平的比较,我们使用遗传算法优化估计量。除了非线性高增益观测器不够精确之外,所有的估计方法都具有相似的估计误差和相似的闭环跟踪性能。尽管存在传感器故障,滑模观测器仍能提供精确的速度估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Velocity Estimation of Robot Manipulators: An Experimental Comparison
Accurate velocity information is often essential to the control of robot manipulators, especially for precise tracking of fast trajectories. However, joint velocities are rarely directly measured and instead estimated to save costs. While many approaches have been proposed for the velocity estimation of robot joints, no comprehensive experimental evaluation exists, making it difficult to choose the appropriate method. This paper compares multiple estimation methods running on a six degrees-of-freedom manipulator. We evaluate: 1) the estimation error using a ground-truth signal, 2) the closed-loop tracking error, 3) convergence behavior, 4) sensor fault tolerance, 5) implementation and tuning effort. To ensure a fair comparison, we optimally tune the estimators using a genetic algorithm. All estimation methods have a similar estimation error and similar closed-loop tracking performance, except for the nonlinear high-gain observer, which is not accurate enough. Sliding-mode observers can provide a precise velocity estimation despite sensor faults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum to “Learning to Boost the Performance of Stable Nonlinear Systems” Generalizing Robust Control Barrier Functions From a Controller Design Perspective 2024 Index IEEE Open Journal of Control Systems Vol. 3 Front Cover Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1