观察与湮灭:反质子的发现

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Physics in Perspective Pub Date : 2021-02-27 DOI:10.1007/s00016-021-00271-7
Kevin Orrman-Rossiter
{"title":"观察与湮灭:反质子的发现","authors":"Kevin Orrman-Rossiter","doi":"10.1007/s00016-021-00271-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper is the first investigation of the events associated with the discovery of the antiproton. The 1955 observation of the antiproton by Owen Chamberlain, Emilio Segrè, Clyde Wiegand, and Thomas Ypsilantis was “no surprise,” in Chamberlain’s words, and might therefore be understood as a classic example of an experimental proof of an existing theory—except there was no complete theory—at best it was a further validation of Dirac’s 1930 prediction of antiparticles. Instead, I argue, it became a contest between the serendipitous observations of cosmic-ray events and the deliberate observation possible with the new accelerator-based experiments. I show that the discovery was an extended event and was seen by the physicists involved as emerging from a combination of supporting experiments—the counter-based detection of antiprotons was accepted as proof of discovery only with the supporting images of antiproton annihilations.</p>","PeriodicalId":727,"journal":{"name":"Physics in Perspective","volume":"23 1","pages":"3 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00016-021-00271-7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observation and Annihilation: The Discovery of the Antiproton\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Orrman-Rossiter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00016-021-00271-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper is the first investigation of the events associated with the discovery of the antiproton. The 1955 observation of the antiproton by Owen Chamberlain, Emilio Segrè, Clyde Wiegand, and Thomas Ypsilantis was “no surprise,” in Chamberlain’s words, and might therefore be understood as a classic example of an experimental proof of an existing theory—except there was no complete theory—at best it was a further validation of Dirac’s 1930 prediction of antiparticles. Instead, I argue, it became a contest between the serendipitous observations of cosmic-ray events and the deliberate observation possible with the new accelerator-based experiments. I show that the discovery was an extended event and was seen by the physicists involved as emerging from a combination of supporting experiments—the counter-based detection of antiprotons was accepted as proof of discovery only with the supporting images of antiproton annihilations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in Perspective\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00016-021-00271-7\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00016-021-00271-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00016-021-00271-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文是对反质子发现相关事件的首次研究。用张伯伦的话说,1955年欧文·张伯伦、埃米利奥·Segrè、克莱德·维冈和托马斯·伊普斯兰提斯对反质子的观察“并不令人惊讶”,因此可以被理解为现有理论的实验证明的经典例子——除了没有完整的理论——它充其量是对狄拉克1930年对反粒子的预测的进一步验证。相反,我认为,它变成了对宇宙射线事件的偶然观察和利用新的基于加速器的实验可能进行的刻意观察之间的竞争。我指出,这一发现是一个延伸的事件,被参与其中的物理学家视为一系列支持实验的结合——反质子的反基探测只有在反质子湮灭的支持图像下才被接受为发现的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observation and Annihilation: The Discovery of the Antiproton

This paper is the first investigation of the events associated with the discovery of the antiproton. The 1955 observation of the antiproton by Owen Chamberlain, Emilio Segrè, Clyde Wiegand, and Thomas Ypsilantis was “no surprise,” in Chamberlain’s words, and might therefore be understood as a classic example of an experimental proof of an existing theory—except there was no complete theory—at best it was a further validation of Dirac’s 1930 prediction of antiparticles. Instead, I argue, it became a contest between the serendipitous observations of cosmic-ray events and the deliberate observation possible with the new accelerator-based experiments. I show that the discovery was an extended event and was seen by the physicists involved as emerging from a combination of supporting experiments—the counter-based detection of antiprotons was accepted as proof of discovery only with the supporting images of antiproton annihilations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in Perspective
Physics in Perspective 物理-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Physics in Perspective seeks to bridge the gulf between physicists and non-physicists through historical and philosophical studies that typically display the unpredictable as well as the cross-disciplinary interplay of observation, experiment, and theory that has occurred over extended periods of time in academic, governmental, and industrial settings and in allied disciplines such as astrophysics, chemical physics, and geophysics. The journal also publishes first-person accounts by physicists of significant contributions they have made, biographical articles, book reviews, and guided tours of historical sites in cities throughout the world. It strives to make all articles understandable to a broad spectrum of readers – scientists, teachers, students, and the public at large. Bibliographic Data Phys. Perspect. 1 volume per year, 4 issues per volume approx. 500 pages per volume Format: 15.5 x 23.5cm ISSN 1422-6944 (print) ISSN 1422-6960 (electronic)
期刊最新文献
The Value of the Einstein-Besso Manuscript The Protest that Never Was: Silencing Political Activism at CERN Before and During the Vietnam War The Fight Against Hailstorms in Italy, 1950–70: A Long History of Confirmation Bias In Praise of Builders Milestones Along the Way: Autobiographical Reflections of Roger H. Stuewer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1