人类废弃物中稀土金属可持续增值的挑战与机遇

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Pub Date : 2023-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s11157-023-09647-2
Basudev Swain
{"title":"人类废弃物中稀土金属可持续增值的挑战与机遇","authors":"Basudev Swain","doi":"10.1007/s11157-023-09647-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Progressively and projected integration of rare earth metals (REMs) in modern technologies, especially in the clean energy, consumer electronics, aerospace, automotive, and defense sectors, place REMs as critical raw materials in the supply chain and strategic metal from the fourth industrial revolution perspective. Current REM production from the primary mineral resources in the supply chain versus industrial demand is at a bottleneck. Alternatively, REM-bearing anthropogenic wastes are pertinent and potent to addressing the critical supply chain bottleneck. Although secondary REM resources are prudent to address the critical supply chain bottleneck, the absence of effective and efficient technologies to recover these REMs from anthropogenic waste imposes challenges and provides opportunities. Hence, this review analyses and discusses the significance of anthropogenic wastes for REM recovery, the status of recycling technologies for sustainable valorization of REMs, challenges, and opportunities. The current review covers the potential quantitative REM wealth locked in various anthropogenic waste like (i) spent rare earth permanent magnets, (ii) spent batteries, (iii) spent tri-band REM phosphors, (iv) bauxite industry residue red mud, (v) blast furnace slag and (v) coal mines, and coal byproducts and status of valorization technologies for circularizing the REMs. In industrial waste like red mud, steelmaking slag, blast furnace slag, and coal fly ash typically 109,000, 2000, 39,000, and 354,000 tons of REM get scrapped, respectively, in a conservative estimation. In the years 2020 and 2021, respectively, 240,000 and 280,000 tons of REM were produced by mine production in contrast to 504,000 tons of REM that were scrapped with REM-bearing industrial waste. This review revealed that total REM currently getting scrapped with anthropogenic waste versus projected REM demand for the years 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 could be standing at 2.66, 2.51, 2.37, and 2.23, respectively. Our investigation revealed that efficient recovery of REMs from anthropogenic waste is significant and promising but associated with challenges like lack of industrial-scale valorization process, lack of a clear strategy, road map, policy, effort, funding, and diversified research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":754,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","volume":"22 1","pages":"133 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11157-023-09647-2.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and opportunities for sustainable valorization of rare earth metals from anthropogenic waste\",\"authors\":\"Basudev Swain\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11157-023-09647-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Progressively and projected integration of rare earth metals (REMs) in modern technologies, especially in the clean energy, consumer electronics, aerospace, automotive, and defense sectors, place REMs as critical raw materials in the supply chain and strategic metal from the fourth industrial revolution perspective. Current REM production from the primary mineral resources in the supply chain versus industrial demand is at a bottleneck. Alternatively, REM-bearing anthropogenic wastes are pertinent and potent to addressing the critical supply chain bottleneck. Although secondary REM resources are prudent to address the critical supply chain bottleneck, the absence of effective and efficient technologies to recover these REMs from anthropogenic waste imposes challenges and provides opportunities. Hence, this review analyses and discusses the significance of anthropogenic wastes for REM recovery, the status of recycling technologies for sustainable valorization of REMs, challenges, and opportunities. The current review covers the potential quantitative REM wealth locked in various anthropogenic waste like (i) spent rare earth permanent magnets, (ii) spent batteries, (iii) spent tri-band REM phosphors, (iv) bauxite industry residue red mud, (v) blast furnace slag and (v) coal mines, and coal byproducts and status of valorization technologies for circularizing the REMs. In industrial waste like red mud, steelmaking slag, blast furnace slag, and coal fly ash typically 109,000, 2000, 39,000, and 354,000 tons of REM get scrapped, respectively, in a conservative estimation. In the years 2020 and 2021, respectively, 240,000 and 280,000 tons of REM were produced by mine production in contrast to 504,000 tons of REM that were scrapped with REM-bearing industrial waste. This review revealed that total REM currently getting scrapped with anthropogenic waste versus projected REM demand for the years 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 could be standing at 2.66, 2.51, 2.37, and 2.23, respectively. Our investigation revealed that efficient recovery of REMs from anthropogenic waste is significant and promising but associated with challenges like lack of industrial-scale valorization process, lack of a clear strategy, road map, policy, effort, funding, and diversified research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"133 - 173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11157-023-09647-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11157-023-09647-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11157-023-09647-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

从第四次工业革命的角度来看,稀土金属在现代技术,特别是在清洁能源、消费电子、航空航天、汽车和国防领域的逐步和预期整合,使稀土金属成为供应链中的关键原材料和战略金属。目前供应链中主要矿产资源的REM生产与工业需求相比处于瓶颈状态。另外,含reme的人为废物是解决关键供应链瓶颈的相关和有效的方法。虽然次级REM资源对于解决关键的供应链瓶颈是谨慎的,但缺乏有效和高效的技术来从人为废物中回收这些REM,这给我们带来了挑战,也提供了机遇。因此,本文分析和讨论了人为废物对REM回收的意义,REM可持续增值的回收技术的现状,挑战和机遇。本文综述了各种人为废弃物(1)废稀土永磁体、(2)废电池、(3)废三波段REM荧光粉、(4)铝土矿工业渣红泥、(5)高炉渣和(5)煤矿、煤炭副产品中潜在的REM定量财富,以及循环利用这些REM的增值技术现状。保守估计,在红泥、炼钢渣、高炉渣和粉煤灰等工业废物中,通常分别有10.9万吨、2000吨、3.9万吨和35.4万吨REM被废弃。2020年和2021年,矿山生产的REM分别为24万吨和28万吨,而含REM的工业废物报废的REM为50.4万吨。该综述显示,与2022年、2023年、2024年和2025年预计的REM需求相比,目前被人为废物废弃的REM总量可能分别为2.66、2.51、2.37和2.23。我们的调查显示,从人为废物中有效回收稀土具有重要意义和前景,但也存在一些挑战,如缺乏工业规模的增值过程,缺乏明确的战略、路线图、政策、努力、资金和多样化的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges and opportunities for sustainable valorization of rare earth metals from anthropogenic waste

Progressively and projected integration of rare earth metals (REMs) in modern technologies, especially in the clean energy, consumer electronics, aerospace, automotive, and defense sectors, place REMs as critical raw materials in the supply chain and strategic metal from the fourth industrial revolution perspective. Current REM production from the primary mineral resources in the supply chain versus industrial demand is at a bottleneck. Alternatively, REM-bearing anthropogenic wastes are pertinent and potent to addressing the critical supply chain bottleneck. Although secondary REM resources are prudent to address the critical supply chain bottleneck, the absence of effective and efficient technologies to recover these REMs from anthropogenic waste imposes challenges and provides opportunities. Hence, this review analyses and discusses the significance of anthropogenic wastes for REM recovery, the status of recycling technologies for sustainable valorization of REMs, challenges, and opportunities. The current review covers the potential quantitative REM wealth locked in various anthropogenic waste like (i) spent rare earth permanent magnets, (ii) spent batteries, (iii) spent tri-band REM phosphors, (iv) bauxite industry residue red mud, (v) blast furnace slag and (v) coal mines, and coal byproducts and status of valorization technologies for circularizing the REMs. In industrial waste like red mud, steelmaking slag, blast furnace slag, and coal fly ash typically 109,000, 2000, 39,000, and 354,000 tons of REM get scrapped, respectively, in a conservative estimation. In the years 2020 and 2021, respectively, 240,000 and 280,000 tons of REM were produced by mine production in contrast to 504,000 tons of REM that were scrapped with REM-bearing industrial waste. This review revealed that total REM currently getting scrapped with anthropogenic waste versus projected REM demand for the years 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 could be standing at 2.66, 2.51, 2.37, and 2.23, respectively. Our investigation revealed that efficient recovery of REMs from anthropogenic waste is significant and promising but associated with challenges like lack of industrial-scale valorization process, lack of a clear strategy, road map, policy, effort, funding, and diversified research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Environmental Science-Waste Management and Disposal
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology is a publication that offers easily comprehensible, reliable, and well-rounded perspectives and evaluations in the realm of environmental science and (bio)technology. It disseminates the most recent progressions and timely compilations of groundbreaking scientific discoveries, technological advancements, practical applications, policy developments, and societal concerns encompassing all facets of environmental science and (bio)technology. Furthermore, it tackles broader aspects beyond the natural sciences, incorporating subjects such as education, funding, policy-making, intellectual property, and societal influence.
期刊最新文献
The potential of biochar incorporation into agricultural soils to promote sustainable agriculture: insights from soil health, crop productivity, greenhouse gas emission mitigation and feasibility perspectives—a critical review Chemical interactions under the bark: bark-, ambrosia-, and wood-boring beetles and their microbial associates Biochar: a potential and green adsorbent for antibiotics removal from aqueous solution Unveiling the evolution of anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications, fouling issues, and future perspective in wastewater treatment Correction to: Harnessing green tide Ulva biomass for carbon dioxide sequestration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1