氡发射功率的估算:不同方法的比较

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Air Quality Atmosphere and Health Pub Date : 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1007/s11869-023-01389-y
Jelena M. Stajic, Biljana Nikic, Ljiljana Gulan, Milena Zivkovic, Slavko Radonjic, Dragoslav Nikezic
{"title":"氡发射功率的估算:不同方法的比较","authors":"Jelena M. Stajic,&nbsp;Biljana Nikic,&nbsp;Ljiljana Gulan,&nbsp;Milena Zivkovic,&nbsp;Slavko Radonjic,&nbsp;Dragoslav Nikezic","doi":"10.1007/s11869-023-01389-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Radon emanation power was estimated by applying three different methods. The first was based on measuring radon exhalation rates by closed-loop accumulation method employing RAD7 device. Radon leakage rate was determined by applying two models of fitting the experimental data. Specific activities of <sup>226</sup>Ra in soil samples were measured by coaxial HPGe detector (GEM30-70, ORTEC). The second method was indirect gamma-ray spectrometry method which included two separate measurements of counts under the photopeaks of 351.9 keV (<sup>214</sup>Pb) and 609.3 keV (<sup>214</sup>Bi). The influence of sample moisture content on radon emanation was demonstrated by both methods. Radon emanation power of the sample with the highest radon exhalation rate was also estimated by 2-month exposure of two radon diffusion chambers equipped with CR-39 detectors. A good agreement among the results was obtained; coefficient of variation was below 10% for the samples employed in the study. Assuming zero volumetric fraction of <sup>218</sup>Po in air provided more consistent results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of radon emanation power: a comparison of different methods\",\"authors\":\"Jelena M. Stajic,&nbsp;Biljana Nikic,&nbsp;Ljiljana Gulan,&nbsp;Milena Zivkovic,&nbsp;Slavko Radonjic,&nbsp;Dragoslav Nikezic\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11869-023-01389-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Radon emanation power was estimated by applying three different methods. The first was based on measuring radon exhalation rates by closed-loop accumulation method employing RAD7 device. Radon leakage rate was determined by applying two models of fitting the experimental data. Specific activities of <sup>226</sup>Ra in soil samples were measured by coaxial HPGe detector (GEM30-70, ORTEC). The second method was indirect gamma-ray spectrometry method which included two separate measurements of counts under the photopeaks of 351.9 keV (<sup>214</sup>Pb) and 609.3 keV (<sup>214</sup>Bi). The influence of sample moisture content on radon emanation was demonstrated by both methods. Radon emanation power of the sample with the highest radon exhalation rate was also estimated by 2-month exposure of two radon diffusion chambers equipped with CR-39 detectors. A good agreement among the results was obtained; coefficient of variation was below 10% for the samples employed in the study. Assuming zero volumetric fraction of <sup>218</sup>Po in air provided more consistent results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-023-01389-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-023-01389-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用三种不同的方法估算了氡的发射功率。第一种是基于采用RAD7装置的闭环累积法测量氡呼出率。采用两种模型拟合实验数据,确定了氡泄漏率。采用同轴HPGe探测器(GEM30-70,ORTEC)测定土壤样品中226Ra的比活性。第二种方法是间接伽马射线光谱法,包括在351.9 keV(214Pb)和609.3 keV(214 Bi)的光峰下进行两次单独的计数测量。两种方法都证明了样品含水量对氡散发的影响。通过两个装有CR-39探测器的氡扩散室暴露2个月,还估算了氡呼出率最高的样品的氡散发能力。结果一致性良好;研究中使用的样本的变异系数低于10%。假设空气中218Po的零体积分数提供了更一致的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of radon emanation power: a comparison of different methods

Radon emanation power was estimated by applying three different methods. The first was based on measuring radon exhalation rates by closed-loop accumulation method employing RAD7 device. Radon leakage rate was determined by applying two models of fitting the experimental data. Specific activities of 226Ra in soil samples were measured by coaxial HPGe detector (GEM30-70, ORTEC). The second method was indirect gamma-ray spectrometry method which included two separate measurements of counts under the photopeaks of 351.9 keV (214Pb) and 609.3 keV (214Bi). The influence of sample moisture content on radon emanation was demonstrated by both methods. Radon emanation power of the sample with the highest radon exhalation rate was also estimated by 2-month exposure of two radon diffusion chambers equipped with CR-39 detectors. A good agreement among the results was obtained; coefficient of variation was below 10% for the samples employed in the study. Assuming zero volumetric fraction of 218Po in air provided more consistent results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
期刊最新文献
Reduction of 2,6-dimethoxyphenol odor emitted from Ribbed Smoked Sheet by Co(II)-salen complex The regulation effect of urban green space on air particulate matter concentration under different matrices in Xi'an city Moss biomonitoring of air quality linked with trace metals pollution around a metallurgical complex in Elbasan, Albania An analytical comparison of two versions (US EPA and BIS) of pararosaniline method used for monitoring of ambient SO2 Long term trends in global air pollution potential and its application to ventilation corridors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1