{"title":"中国能摆脱大豆困境吗?中国大豆产量差距分析","authors":"Yucheng Wang, Xiaoxia Ling, Chunmei Ma, Changyan Liu, Wei Zhang, Jianliang Huang, Shaobing Peng, Nanyan Deng","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00897-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China is the largest soybean-consuming country in the world, but its self-sufficiency rate (SSR) of 16% is very low and it therefore has to heavily rely on imports. To solve the soybean dilemma in China, it is necessary to examine the maximum amount of soybean that could be grown on the land currently used, how much land could reasonably be used to expand soybean acreage, and whether China could sustainably increase soybean self-sufficiency to reduce the risks of import reliance. To answer these questions, our paper presents a high-resolution spatial analysis of potential soybean production in China using primary data of weather and crop production practices that govern this potential. We employed a “bottom-up” scaling protocol to estimate gaps between potential yield with optimal management and current yields in three major soybean-planting regions, namely, Northeast China, Central China, and South China. We found that current soybean yield gap (Yg) in China is 49% and 45% of potential yield under irrigated and rainfed cropping systems, respectively. By closing the yield gap, Northeast China could provide additional soybean production equivalent to 32% of the current national total. Our results show that SSR could only be increased to 21–23% in 2030 by Yg closure alone but could be increased to a maximum of 52% by combining Yg closure and a reasonable area expansion. Even so, at least 61.08 million tons of soybean accounting for 38% of global soybean trade would still need to be imported to meet future domestic demand. We discuss strategies for soybean production increase based on Yg closure in the most valuable areas and cropland expansion in a sustainable manner in order to increase SSR as well as lessen the import pressure on the global market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can China get out of soy dilemma? A yield gap analysis of soybean in China\",\"authors\":\"Yucheng Wang, Xiaoxia Ling, Chunmei Ma, Changyan Liu, Wei Zhang, Jianliang Huang, Shaobing Peng, Nanyan Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13593-023-00897-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>China is the largest soybean-consuming country in the world, but its self-sufficiency rate (SSR) of 16% is very low and it therefore has to heavily rely on imports. To solve the soybean dilemma in China, it is necessary to examine the maximum amount of soybean that could be grown on the land currently used, how much land could reasonably be used to expand soybean acreage, and whether China could sustainably increase soybean self-sufficiency to reduce the risks of import reliance. To answer these questions, our paper presents a high-resolution spatial analysis of potential soybean production in China using primary data of weather and crop production practices that govern this potential. We employed a “bottom-up” scaling protocol to estimate gaps between potential yield with optimal management and current yields in three major soybean-planting regions, namely, Northeast China, Central China, and South China. We found that current soybean yield gap (Yg) in China is 49% and 45% of potential yield under irrigated and rainfed cropping systems, respectively. By closing the yield gap, Northeast China could provide additional soybean production equivalent to 32% of the current national total. Our results show that SSR could only be increased to 21–23% in 2030 by Yg closure alone but could be increased to a maximum of 52% by combining Yg closure and a reasonable area expansion. Even so, at least 61.08 million tons of soybean accounting for 38% of global soybean trade would still need to be imported to meet future domestic demand. We discuss strategies for soybean production increase based on Yg closure in the most valuable areas and cropland expansion in a sustainable manner in order to increase SSR as well as lessen the import pressure on the global market.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00897-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00897-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can China get out of soy dilemma? A yield gap analysis of soybean in China
China is the largest soybean-consuming country in the world, but its self-sufficiency rate (SSR) of 16% is very low and it therefore has to heavily rely on imports. To solve the soybean dilemma in China, it is necessary to examine the maximum amount of soybean that could be grown on the land currently used, how much land could reasonably be used to expand soybean acreage, and whether China could sustainably increase soybean self-sufficiency to reduce the risks of import reliance. To answer these questions, our paper presents a high-resolution spatial analysis of potential soybean production in China using primary data of weather and crop production practices that govern this potential. We employed a “bottom-up” scaling protocol to estimate gaps between potential yield with optimal management and current yields in three major soybean-planting regions, namely, Northeast China, Central China, and South China. We found that current soybean yield gap (Yg) in China is 49% and 45% of potential yield under irrigated and rainfed cropping systems, respectively. By closing the yield gap, Northeast China could provide additional soybean production equivalent to 32% of the current national total. Our results show that SSR could only be increased to 21–23% in 2030 by Yg closure alone but could be increased to a maximum of 52% by combining Yg closure and a reasonable area expansion. Even so, at least 61.08 million tons of soybean accounting for 38% of global soybean trade would still need to be imported to meet future domestic demand. We discuss strategies for soybean production increase based on Yg closure in the most valuable areas and cropland expansion in a sustainable manner in order to increase SSR as well as lessen the import pressure on the global market.
期刊介绍:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences.
ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels.
Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.