革命的生物文化分析

Penny Anthon Green
{"title":"革命的生物文化分析","authors":"Penny Anthon Green","doi":"10.1016/0140-1750(91)90015-I","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When analyzed from the vantage point of modern evolutionary theory, sociopolitical revolutions may be viewed as complex behavioral expressions of the competition inherent in natural selection. They involve behavior by challengers that aims toward displacing those who enjoy first access to available power and resources. Revolutions also reveal rulers defending their advantages. The analysis unfolds in three stages: (a) sociopolitical revolutions explained, at least partially, in terms of the logic of natural selection; (b) identification of some “strategies” utilized by both challengers and incumbents in competition for the political apex—these strategies may be thought of as ultimately resulting from evolved behavioral predispositions whose strength, and therefore degree of phenotypical expression, is dependent upon sociocultural influences (changes in the intensity of such predispositions result in challengers and incumbents respectively pursuing strategies that end in the replacement of one ruling group by another); (c) reexamination of some contributions that social scientists have made to our understanding of revolutions. The objective is explication of the relationship between behavioral predispositions and sociocultural variables that have been identified as co-determinants of these political upheavals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81696,"journal":{"name":"Journal of social and biological structures","volume":"14 4","pages":"Pages 435-454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0140-1750(91)90015-I","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A biocultural analysis of revolution\",\"authors\":\"Penny Anthon Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0140-1750(91)90015-I\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>When analyzed from the vantage point of modern evolutionary theory, sociopolitical revolutions may be viewed as complex behavioral expressions of the competition inherent in natural selection. They involve behavior by challengers that aims toward displacing those who enjoy first access to available power and resources. Revolutions also reveal rulers defending their advantages. The analysis unfolds in three stages: (a) sociopolitical revolutions explained, at least partially, in terms of the logic of natural selection; (b) identification of some “strategies” utilized by both challengers and incumbents in competition for the political apex—these strategies may be thought of as ultimately resulting from evolved behavioral predispositions whose strength, and therefore degree of phenotypical expression, is dependent upon sociocultural influences (changes in the intensity of such predispositions result in challengers and incumbents respectively pursuing strategies that end in the replacement of one ruling group by another); (c) reexamination of some contributions that social scientists have made to our understanding of revolutions. The objective is explication of the relationship between behavioral predispositions and sociocultural variables that have been identified as co-determinants of these political upheavals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of social and biological structures\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 435-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0140-1750(91)90015-I\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of social and biological structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014017509190015I\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of social and biological structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014017509190015I","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

从现代进化理论的角度分析,社会政治革命可以被看作是自然选择中固有竞争的复杂行为表现。它们涉及挑战者的行为,旨在取代那些最先获得可用权力和资源的人。革命还揭示了统治者捍卫自己的优势。分析分三个阶段展开:(a)社会政治革命至少部分地用自然选择的逻辑来解释;(b)识别挑战者和在位者在政治巅峰竞争中使用的一些“策略”——这些策略可能被认为是进化的行为倾向的最终结果,其强度,因此表型表达的程度,依赖于社会文化影响(这种倾向强度的变化导致挑战者和在位者各自采取的战略以一个统治集团被另一个统治集团取代而告终);(c)重新审视社会科学家对我们理解革命所作的贡献。目的是解释行为倾向和社会文化变量之间的关系,这些变量已被确定为这些政治动荡的共同决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A biocultural analysis of revolution

When analyzed from the vantage point of modern evolutionary theory, sociopolitical revolutions may be viewed as complex behavioral expressions of the competition inherent in natural selection. They involve behavior by challengers that aims toward displacing those who enjoy first access to available power and resources. Revolutions also reveal rulers defending their advantages. The analysis unfolds in three stages: (a) sociopolitical revolutions explained, at least partially, in terms of the logic of natural selection; (b) identification of some “strategies” utilized by both challengers and incumbents in competition for the political apex—these strategies may be thought of as ultimately resulting from evolved behavioral predispositions whose strength, and therefore degree of phenotypical expression, is dependent upon sociocultural influences (changes in the intensity of such predispositions result in challengers and incumbents respectively pursuing strategies that end in the replacement of one ruling group by another); (c) reexamination of some contributions that social scientists have made to our understanding of revolutions. The objective is explication of the relationship between behavioral predispositions and sociocultural variables that have been identified as co-determinants of these political upheavals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of EV-A71 vaccination in prevention of paediatric hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with EV-A71 virus infection requiring hospitalisation in Henan, China, 2017-18: a test-negative case-control study. Editorial Board Bibliography All autopoietic systems must be social systems (living implies autopoietic. But, autopoietic does not imply living): An application of autopoietic criteria in systems analysis Intuition—A human tool for generalizing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1