Christina Cornelia Shuttleworth , Charmaine Williamson
{"title":"一种研究咨询模式,指导更高学位的会计学生和导师成为学者社区的一部分","authors":"Christina Cornelia Shuttleworth , Charmaine Williamson","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article explores how research management, through a research advisory model (RAM), can guide accounting students and supervisors to transition to a research-focused community of practice by gaining greater methodological diversity and theoretical development during their higher degree studies. Memory-work narrative responses from e-interviews with 21 accounting faculty members, of which 15 were higher degree students and six supervisors, were thematically analysed. Document analysis was conducted to explore how the faculty’s research profile has changed since the inception of the new faculty and the implementation of the research management capacity-building programme. In line with the theory of legitimate peripheral participation (LPP), this article shows how a peripheral model of participation assisted accounting higher degree students and their supervisors to embrace research and become part of a community of scholars. The novel advisory model can be used to assist higher degree students and their supervisors during the challenging transition from accounting professional to researcher. A conceptual trajectory including LPP theory as an analytical and practical lens to support pathways to change is offered as a modest contribution. The RAM is posited as an option for faculties in guiding students to overcome related challenges and gain confidence in the research process. The model can also be useful for other faculties working towards similar goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A research advisory model guiding higher degree accounting students and supervisors to become part of a community of scholars\",\"authors\":\"Christina Cornelia Shuttleworth , Charmaine Williamson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article explores how research management, through a research advisory model (RAM), can guide accounting students and supervisors to transition to a research-focused community of practice by gaining greater methodological diversity and theoretical development during their higher degree studies. Memory-work narrative responses from e-interviews with 21 accounting faculty members, of which 15 were higher degree students and six supervisors, were thematically analysed. Document analysis was conducted to explore how the faculty’s research profile has changed since the inception of the new faculty and the implementation of the research management capacity-building programme. In line with the theory of legitimate peripheral participation (LPP), this article shows how a peripheral model of participation assisted accounting higher degree students and their supervisors to embrace research and become part of a community of scholars. The novel advisory model can be used to assist higher degree students and their supervisors during the challenging transition from accounting professional to researcher. A conceptual trajectory including LPP theory as an analytical and practical lens to support pathways to change is offered as a modest contribution. The RAM is posited as an option for faculties in guiding students to overcome related challenges and gain confidence in the research process. The model can also be useful for other faculties working towards similar goals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074857512200046X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074857512200046X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
A research advisory model guiding higher degree accounting students and supervisors to become part of a community of scholars
This article explores how research management, through a research advisory model (RAM), can guide accounting students and supervisors to transition to a research-focused community of practice by gaining greater methodological diversity and theoretical development during their higher degree studies. Memory-work narrative responses from e-interviews with 21 accounting faculty members, of which 15 were higher degree students and six supervisors, were thematically analysed. Document analysis was conducted to explore how the faculty’s research profile has changed since the inception of the new faculty and the implementation of the research management capacity-building programme. In line with the theory of legitimate peripheral participation (LPP), this article shows how a peripheral model of participation assisted accounting higher degree students and their supervisors to embrace research and become part of a community of scholars. The novel advisory model can be used to assist higher degree students and their supervisors during the challenging transition from accounting professional to researcher. A conceptual trajectory including LPP theory as an analytical and practical lens to support pathways to change is offered as a modest contribution. The RAM is posited as an option for faculties in guiding students to overcome related challenges and gain confidence in the research process. The model can also be useful for other faculties working towards similar goals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.