金州的交通蓝调:加州区域交通乘客趋势

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Public Transportation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100030
Jacob L. Wasserman , Brian D. Taylor
{"title":"金州的交通蓝调:加州区域交通乘客趋势","authors":"Jacob L. Wasserman ,&nbsp;Brian D. Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Public investment in transit increased following the Great Recession, yet transit use nationally mostly fell, even prior to the 2020 pandemic. We investigate this troubling disjuncture by comparing transit ridership trends during the 2010s in two of America’s largest regions: Greater Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area. While both California regions lost transit riders, we see substantial differences in the scale, timing, geography, and modes of these declines. In the LA area, ridership fell longer and further, spread more across routes, times, and sub-regions and concentrated on the region’s dominant operator. In both regions, increasing auto access appears to have played a central role, albeit in different ways. Greater LA saw increased automobile ownership, particularly among high-propensity transit riders. In the Bay Area, as jobs and housing have dispersed, ridehail services like Lyft and Uber may have eroded non-commute transit use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Transportation","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000303/pdfft?md5=d1794de8f7e8b1744ff2de45b092d7cd&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X22000303-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transit Blues in the Golden State: Regional transit ridership trends in California\",\"authors\":\"Jacob L. Wasserman ,&nbsp;Brian D. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Public investment in transit increased following the Great Recession, yet transit use nationally mostly fell, even prior to the 2020 pandemic. We investigate this troubling disjuncture by comparing transit ridership trends during the 2010s in two of America’s largest regions: Greater Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area. While both California regions lost transit riders, we see substantial differences in the scale, timing, geography, and modes of these declines. In the LA area, ridership fell longer and further, spread more across routes, times, and sub-regions and concentrated on the region’s dominant operator. In both regions, increasing auto access appears to have played a central role, albeit in different ways. Greater LA saw increased automobile ownership, particularly among high-propensity transit riders. In the Bay Area, as jobs and housing have dispersed, ridehail services like Lyft and Uber may have eroded non-commute transit use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000303/pdfft?md5=d1794de8f7e8b1744ff2de45b092d7cd&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X22000303-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000303\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

大衰退之后,公共交通投资有所增加,但即使在2020年大流行之前,全国的公共交通使用量也大多下降。我们通过比较2010年代美国两个最大地区:大洛杉矶和旧金山湾区的交通客流量趋势,来调查这种令人不安的脱节。虽然加州的两个地区都失去了公交乘客,但我们看到这些下降在规模、时间、地理和模式上存在巨大差异。在洛杉矶地区,客流量下降的时间更长,幅度更大,更多地分布在不同的路线、时间和子地区,并集中在该地区占主导地位的运营商。在这两个地区,增加汽车通行似乎发挥了核心作用,尽管方式不同。大洛杉矶地区的汽车拥有量有所增加,尤其是在高倾向的公交乘客中。在旧金山湾区,随着工作和住房的分散,Lyft和优步等叫车服务可能侵蚀了非通勤交通的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transit Blues in the Golden State: Regional transit ridership trends in California

Public investment in transit increased following the Great Recession, yet transit use nationally mostly fell, even prior to the 2020 pandemic. We investigate this troubling disjuncture by comparing transit ridership trends during the 2010s in two of America’s largest regions: Greater Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area. While both California regions lost transit riders, we see substantial differences in the scale, timing, geography, and modes of these declines. In the LA area, ridership fell longer and further, spread more across routes, times, and sub-regions and concentrated on the region’s dominant operator. In both regions, increasing auto access appears to have played a central role, albeit in different ways. Greater LA saw increased automobile ownership, particularly among high-propensity transit riders. In the Bay Area, as jobs and housing have dispersed, ridehail services like Lyft and Uber may have eroded non-commute transit use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Transportation, affiliated with the Center for Urban Transportation Research, is an international peer-reviewed open access journal focused on various forms of public transportation. It publishes original research from diverse academic disciplines, including engineering, economics, planning, and policy, emphasizing innovative solutions to transportation challenges. Content covers mobility services available to the general public, such as line-based services and shared fleets, offering insights beneficial to passengers, agencies, service providers, and communities.
期刊最新文献
Simulating the effect of strategies to increase transit ridership by reallocating bus service: Two case studies Evaluating public a priori acceptance of autonomous modular transit using an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model The crucial role of motorcycle-based ride-hailing among commuters: The case of Jakarta and Bandung in metropolitan areas Bus stop spacing statistics: Theory and evidence Analyzing the relationship between bus and ride-hailing use in a large emerging economy city: A bivariate ordered probit model application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1