大学生对教学效果的感知。对学生敬业度的影响

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Revista De Psicodidactica Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psicod.2020.11.005
Carmen-María Fernández–García, Marcos Rodríguez-Álvarez, María-Paulina Viñuela-Hernández
{"title":"大学生对教学效果的感知。对学生敬业度的影响","authors":"Carmen-María Fernández–García,&nbsp;Marcos Rodríguez-Álvarez,&nbsp;María-Paulina Viñuela-Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.psicod.2020.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is based on a <em>teacher effectiveness</em> model with six teaching behaviour domains <em>(safe learning climate, efficient classroom management, clarity of instruction, activating teaching, differentiation and teaching – learning strategies</em>). The main purpose has been to examine university student perceptions of <em>teaching effectiveness</em> and its influence on students’ <em>academic engagement</em>. The sample is composed by 782 students from 16 universities. Data have been collected with a transversal design by using the instruments <em>My Teacher Questionnaire</em> and the <em>Academic Engagement Scale</em>, both with a likert format and adapted in the study population. Findings suggest differences concerning <em>teachers’ gender</em> and <em>type of studies</em>: male teachers are perceived by their students as better, and teachers belonging to studies of Arts and Humanities, Social and Legal Sciences and Health Sciences are also perceived more positively. Regarding <em>students’ engagement</em> results confirm the predictive power of <em>classroom management, activating teaching</em> and <em>differentiation</em> domains. The percentage of explained variance is bigger for <em>emotional engagement</em> than for <em>behavioural</em> one. This kind of investigations give us very interesting information in order to identify which aspects of higher education need to be reinforced and which ones, on the contrary, are already positively perceived by students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46733,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicodidactica","volume":"26 1","pages":"Pages 62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La percepción de los estudiantes universitarios acerca de la eficacia docente. Efectos sobre el compromiso de los estudiantes\",\"authors\":\"Carmen-María Fernández–García,&nbsp;Marcos Rodríguez-Álvarez,&nbsp;María-Paulina Viñuela-Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psicod.2020.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper is based on a <em>teacher effectiveness</em> model with six teaching behaviour domains <em>(safe learning climate, efficient classroom management, clarity of instruction, activating teaching, differentiation and teaching – learning strategies</em>). The main purpose has been to examine university student perceptions of <em>teaching effectiveness</em> and its influence on students’ <em>academic engagement</em>. The sample is composed by 782 students from 16 universities. Data have been collected with a transversal design by using the instruments <em>My Teacher Questionnaire</em> and the <em>Academic Engagement Scale</em>, both with a likert format and adapted in the study population. Findings suggest differences concerning <em>teachers’ gender</em> and <em>type of studies</em>: male teachers are perceived by their students as better, and teachers belonging to studies of Arts and Humanities, Social and Legal Sciences and Health Sciences are also perceived more positively. Regarding <em>students’ engagement</em> results confirm the predictive power of <em>classroom management, activating teaching</em> and <em>differentiation</em> domains. The percentage of explained variance is bigger for <em>emotional engagement</em> than for <em>behavioural</em> one. This kind of investigations give us very interesting information in order to identify which aspects of higher education need to be reinforced and which ones, on the contrary, are already positively perceived by students.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 62-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103420300435\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicodidactica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103420300435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文基于一个包含六个教学行为域(安全的学习氛围、高效的课堂管理、清晰的教学、活跃的教学、差异化和教与学策略)的教师有效性模型。主要目的是研究大学生对教学有效性的看法及其对学生学业投入的影响。样本由来自16所大学的782名学生组成。数据收集采用横向设计,使用我的老师问卷和学术参与量表,两者都采用李克特格式,并适用于研究人群。调查结果表明,教师的性别和研究类型存在差异:学生认为男教师更好,艺术和人文学科、社会和法律科学以及健康科学专业的教师也得到更积极的看法。关于学生参与的结果,证实了课堂管理、激活教学和差异化领域的预测能力。解释方差的百分比在情感投入上大于行为投入。这种调查为我们提供了非常有趣的信息,以便确定高等教育的哪些方面需要加强,哪些方面,相反,已经被学生积极地认识到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La percepción de los estudiantes universitarios acerca de la eficacia docente. Efectos sobre el compromiso de los estudiantes

This paper is based on a teacher effectiveness model with six teaching behaviour domains (safe learning climate, efficient classroom management, clarity of instruction, activating teaching, differentiation and teaching – learning strategies). The main purpose has been to examine university student perceptions of teaching effectiveness and its influence on students’ academic engagement. The sample is composed by 782 students from 16 universities. Data have been collected with a transversal design by using the instruments My Teacher Questionnaire and the Academic Engagement Scale, both with a likert format and adapted in the study population. Findings suggest differences concerning teachers’ gender and type of studies: male teachers are perceived by their students as better, and teachers belonging to studies of Arts and Humanities, Social and Legal Sciences and Health Sciences are also perceived more positively. Regarding students’ engagement results confirm the predictive power of classroom management, activating teaching and differentiation domains. The percentage of explained variance is bigger for emotional engagement than for behavioural one. This kind of investigations give us very interesting information in order to identify which aspects of higher education need to be reinforced and which ones, on the contrary, are already positively perceived by students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 days
期刊最新文献
Predicción de la intención docente del profesorado en formación inicial a partir del clima de (des-)empoderamiento creado por el formador del profesorado: un análisis longitudinal basado en la teoría de la autodeterminación Los descansos activos como herramienta para mejorar la atención en el contexto educativo. Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis Observando lo inadvertido: la autoeficacia docente como mediador entre el contexto escolar y el agotamiento docente en regiones en desarrollo Eficacia de un programa de prevención multirriesgo en internet: Safety.net ¿La percepción de competencia y alfabetización motriz median la relación entre la competencia motriz y la práctica de actividad física?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1