Axel García, Andrew Lamb, Arseniy Sleptsov, Carolina Moreno, Maria Victorova, Natalia Glazkova, Veronika Shteyngardt
{"title":"后国际空间站计划:应该做些什么?","authors":"Axel García, Andrew Lamb, Arseniy Sleptsov, Carolina Moreno, Maria Victorova, Natalia Glazkova, Veronika Shteyngardt","doi":"10.1016/j.reach.2016.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main goal of this paper is to provide a space students’ view for the next step in the post-ISS era. The retirement of the International Space Station (ISS) within the next decade necessitates the prompt development of the next human space exploration architecture. The plans of NASA to go beyond Earth orbit, initially set up a circumlunar platform, would allow doing research and technology development in many areas, long-duration study of the effects of high radiation doses on humans, the testing of suitable protection methods and preparation for the next steps of human exploration. This plan appears to be the most logical step for future human space exploration. Chinese, Russian and western European mission planners envision a longer-term presence on the Moon, using the Chang’e, Federatsia and Moon Village architectures, respectively. Plans are afoot to develop In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) technologies for creating fuel and structures and providing life support, as well as using the low-electromagnetic-noise environment to make previously unfeasible astronomical observations. Although an intermediate step before going to Moon may be a better solution than going directly, these current plans could be well integrated to an international long-term strategy, where not every nation would focus on immediate necessities at the same time. While a Mars mission is the long-term goal of many space agencies, only ambitious non-governmental organizations such as SpaceX, Mars One and the Mars Society are exploring this as a direct next step. Current skepticisms about technical feasibility already in the direct post-ISS period as well as the enormous cost implications of such projects make it unlikely that this should be the next step. It also appears important to maintain research and earth observation capabilities in LEO post-ISS. Thus, international collaboration using the advantages of the Chinese Station and/or Roscosmos’ ISS component reutilization concept as well as integrating private Industry in the post ISS era would also be wise decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37501,"journal":{"name":"REACH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.reach.2016.06.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-ISS plans: What should be done?\",\"authors\":\"Axel García, Andrew Lamb, Arseniy Sleptsov, Carolina Moreno, Maria Victorova, Natalia Glazkova, Veronika Shteyngardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reach.2016.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The main goal of this paper is to provide a space students’ view for the next step in the post-ISS era. The retirement of the International Space Station (ISS) within the next decade necessitates the prompt development of the next human space exploration architecture. The plans of NASA to go beyond Earth orbit, initially set up a circumlunar platform, would allow doing research and technology development in many areas, long-duration study of the effects of high radiation doses on humans, the testing of suitable protection methods and preparation for the next steps of human exploration. This plan appears to be the most logical step for future human space exploration. Chinese, Russian and western European mission planners envision a longer-term presence on the Moon, using the Chang’e, Federatsia and Moon Village architectures, respectively. Plans are afoot to develop In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) technologies for creating fuel and structures and providing life support, as well as using the low-electromagnetic-noise environment to make previously unfeasible astronomical observations. Although an intermediate step before going to Moon may be a better solution than going directly, these current plans could be well integrated to an international long-term strategy, where not every nation would focus on immediate necessities at the same time. While a Mars mission is the long-term goal of many space agencies, only ambitious non-governmental organizations such as SpaceX, Mars One and the Mars Society are exploring this as a direct next step. Current skepticisms about technical feasibility already in the direct post-ISS period as well as the enormous cost implications of such projects make it unlikely that this should be the next step. It also appears important to maintain research and earth observation capabilities in LEO post-ISS. Thus, international collaboration using the advantages of the Chinese Station and/or Roscosmos’ ISS component reutilization concept as well as integrating private Industry in the post ISS era would also be wise decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REACH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.reach.2016.06.003\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REACH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352309316300074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REACH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352309316300074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
The main goal of this paper is to provide a space students’ view for the next step in the post-ISS era. The retirement of the International Space Station (ISS) within the next decade necessitates the prompt development of the next human space exploration architecture. The plans of NASA to go beyond Earth orbit, initially set up a circumlunar platform, would allow doing research and technology development in many areas, long-duration study of the effects of high radiation doses on humans, the testing of suitable protection methods and preparation for the next steps of human exploration. This plan appears to be the most logical step for future human space exploration. Chinese, Russian and western European mission planners envision a longer-term presence on the Moon, using the Chang’e, Federatsia and Moon Village architectures, respectively. Plans are afoot to develop In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) technologies for creating fuel and structures and providing life support, as well as using the low-electromagnetic-noise environment to make previously unfeasible astronomical observations. Although an intermediate step before going to Moon may be a better solution than going directly, these current plans could be well integrated to an international long-term strategy, where not every nation would focus on immediate necessities at the same time. While a Mars mission is the long-term goal of many space agencies, only ambitious non-governmental organizations such as SpaceX, Mars One and the Mars Society are exploring this as a direct next step. Current skepticisms about technical feasibility already in the direct post-ISS period as well as the enormous cost implications of such projects make it unlikely that this should be the next step. It also appears important to maintain research and earth observation capabilities in LEO post-ISS. Thus, international collaboration using the advantages of the Chinese Station and/or Roscosmos’ ISS component reutilization concept as well as integrating private Industry in the post ISS era would also be wise decisions.
期刊介绍:
The Official Human Space Exploration Review Journal of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) REACH – Reviews in Human Space Exploration is an international review journal that covers the entire field of human space exploration, including: -Human Space Exploration Mission Scenarios -Robotic Space Exploration Missions (Preparing or Supporting Human Missions) -Commercial Human Spaceflight -Space Habitation and Environmental Health -Space Physiology, Psychology, Medicine and Environmental Health -Space Radiation and Radiation Biology -Exo- and Astrobiology -Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) -Spin-off Applications from Human Spaceflight -Benefits from Space-Based Research for Health on Earth -Earth Observation for Agriculture, Climate Monitoring, Disaster Mitigation -Terrestrial Applications of Space Life Sciences Developments -Extreme Environments REACH aims to meet the needs of readers from academia, industry, and government by publishing comprehensive overviews of the science of human and robotic space exploration, life sciences research in space, and beneficial terrestrial applications that are derived from spaceflight. Special emphasis will be put on summarizing the most important recent developments and challenges in each of the covered fields, and on making published articles legible for a non-specialist audience. Authors can also submit non-solicited review articles. Please note that original research articles are not published in REACH. The Journal plans to publish four issues per year containing six to eight review articles each.