{"title":"人类系统集成:帮助减少人为错误的过程,人类空间探索任务的系统工程视角","authors":"Jackelynne Silva-Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.reach.2016.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review article highlights the importance of human systems integration (HSI) in human space exploration. One may think of these terms as common sense, some companies even have some regulations in place for something that sounds similar. However, there is still some work to do in order to fully incorporate the human aspect into our aerospace systems, especially today when we are working with complex and multidisciplinary system of systems. For that reason, this article brings the concepts that different programs are using and integrates them, to put into perspective how different disciplines have similar concepts and goals, bringing opportunities for collaboration. Definition of system, system of systems, systems engineering, human systems integration, human error are provided, and how all these come together. Then an assessment is made of various human reliability analysis techniques used in non-aerospace industries, and how they can be applicable to space systems. The use of error prevention HSI tools is discussed, including human in the loop evaluations, usability tests, and workload evaluations. The article dives into the human systems integration domains at the Department of Defense (DoD) and at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). A comparison graph was created showing HSI activity across mission lifecycle phases and reviews for a commercial product, the DoD, and NASA, using the SEBoK System Life Cycle Process Model, ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 Systems and Software Engineering International Standard for System Life Cycle Processes, NRC Human-System Integration in the System Development Process, and the Human Systems Integration Practitioner’s Guide NASA/SP-2015-3709. Learning about these tools and processes will aid the architecting and engineering of habitats, vehicles, and simply put systems for deep space missions, for which human limitations and capabilities must be accounted during the design phase and continue throughout the product lifecycle to help minimize human error, hence increasing human and product safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37501,"journal":{"name":"REACH","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 8-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.reach.2016.11.003","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human systems integration: process to help minimize human errors, a systems engineering perspective for human space exploration missions\",\"authors\":\"Jackelynne Silva-Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reach.2016.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This review article highlights the importance of human systems integration (HSI) in human space exploration. One may think of these terms as common sense, some companies even have some regulations in place for something that sounds similar. However, there is still some work to do in order to fully incorporate the human aspect into our aerospace systems, especially today when we are working with complex and multidisciplinary system of systems. For that reason, this article brings the concepts that different programs are using and integrates them, to put into perspective how different disciplines have similar concepts and goals, bringing opportunities for collaboration. Definition of system, system of systems, systems engineering, human systems integration, human error are provided, and how all these come together. Then an assessment is made of various human reliability analysis techniques used in non-aerospace industries, and how they can be applicable to space systems. The use of error prevention HSI tools is discussed, including human in the loop evaluations, usability tests, and workload evaluations. The article dives into the human systems integration domains at the Department of Defense (DoD) and at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). A comparison graph was created showing HSI activity across mission lifecycle phases and reviews for a commercial product, the DoD, and NASA, using the SEBoK System Life Cycle Process Model, ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 Systems and Software Engineering International Standard for System Life Cycle Processes, NRC Human-System Integration in the System Development Process, and the Human Systems Integration Practitioner’s Guide NASA/SP-2015-3709. Learning about these tools and processes will aid the architecting and engineering of habitats, vehicles, and simply put systems for deep space missions, for which human limitations and capabilities must be accounted during the design phase and continue throughout the product lifecycle to help minimize human error, hence increasing human and product safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REACH\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 8-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.reach.2016.11.003\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REACH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352309316300190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REACH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352309316300190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human systems integration: process to help minimize human errors, a systems engineering perspective for human space exploration missions
This review article highlights the importance of human systems integration (HSI) in human space exploration. One may think of these terms as common sense, some companies even have some regulations in place for something that sounds similar. However, there is still some work to do in order to fully incorporate the human aspect into our aerospace systems, especially today when we are working with complex and multidisciplinary system of systems. For that reason, this article brings the concepts that different programs are using and integrates them, to put into perspective how different disciplines have similar concepts and goals, bringing opportunities for collaboration. Definition of system, system of systems, systems engineering, human systems integration, human error are provided, and how all these come together. Then an assessment is made of various human reliability analysis techniques used in non-aerospace industries, and how they can be applicable to space systems. The use of error prevention HSI tools is discussed, including human in the loop evaluations, usability tests, and workload evaluations. The article dives into the human systems integration domains at the Department of Defense (DoD) and at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). A comparison graph was created showing HSI activity across mission lifecycle phases and reviews for a commercial product, the DoD, and NASA, using the SEBoK System Life Cycle Process Model, ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 Systems and Software Engineering International Standard for System Life Cycle Processes, NRC Human-System Integration in the System Development Process, and the Human Systems Integration Practitioner’s Guide NASA/SP-2015-3709. Learning about these tools and processes will aid the architecting and engineering of habitats, vehicles, and simply put systems for deep space missions, for which human limitations and capabilities must be accounted during the design phase and continue throughout the product lifecycle to help minimize human error, hence increasing human and product safety.
期刊介绍:
The Official Human Space Exploration Review Journal of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) REACH – Reviews in Human Space Exploration is an international review journal that covers the entire field of human space exploration, including: -Human Space Exploration Mission Scenarios -Robotic Space Exploration Missions (Preparing or Supporting Human Missions) -Commercial Human Spaceflight -Space Habitation and Environmental Health -Space Physiology, Psychology, Medicine and Environmental Health -Space Radiation and Radiation Biology -Exo- and Astrobiology -Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) -Spin-off Applications from Human Spaceflight -Benefits from Space-Based Research for Health on Earth -Earth Observation for Agriculture, Climate Monitoring, Disaster Mitigation -Terrestrial Applications of Space Life Sciences Developments -Extreme Environments REACH aims to meet the needs of readers from academia, industry, and government by publishing comprehensive overviews of the science of human and robotic space exploration, life sciences research in space, and beneficial terrestrial applications that are derived from spaceflight. Special emphasis will be put on summarizing the most important recent developments and challenges in each of the covered fields, and on making published articles legible for a non-specialist audience. Authors can also submit non-solicited review articles. Please note that original research articles are not published in REACH. The Journal plans to publish four issues per year containing six to eight review articles each.