E. Osorio , M. Toledano , R. Osorio , L. Levrini , I. Thompson , F. Foschi , S. Sauro
{"title":"使用生物活性玻璃进行空气偏振处理后,对珐琅的粗糙度进行评估","authors":"E. Osorio , M. Toledano , R. Osorio , L. Levrini , I. Thompson , F. Foschi , S. Sauro","doi":"10.1016/j.pad.2011.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the roughness of the enamel surface after air-polishing.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Fifteen specimens of enamel-MACOR treated with modified-Bioglass 45S5 (SS), aluminum trioxide (AO), or sodium bicarbonate (BS) were analyzed using confocal (CLSM) and atomic force (AFM) microscopy to identify profilometric and micro- and nano-roughness changes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>AO-treated samples were significantly rougher (p<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05) than those treated with BS or SS. Surfaces treated with BS or SS were not significantly different from the untreated control surfaces (p<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05). AO powder produced the greatest profilometric changes, whereas BS and SS produced similar profilometric changes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Air-polishing with SS or BS does not alter enamel roughness, although it may have mild profilometric effects during stain removal procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77593,"journal":{"name":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pad.2011.09.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valutazione della rugosità dello smalto in seguito a trattamenti di air-polishing eseguiti con vetri bioattivi\",\"authors\":\"E. Osorio , M. Toledano , R. Osorio , L. Levrini , I. Thompson , F. Foschi , S. Sauro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pad.2011.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the roughness of the enamel surface after air-polishing.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Fifteen specimens of enamel-MACOR treated with modified-Bioglass 45S5 (SS), aluminum trioxide (AO), or sodium bicarbonate (BS) were analyzed using confocal (CLSM) and atomic force (AFM) microscopy to identify profilometric and micro- and nano-roughness changes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>AO-treated samples were significantly rougher (p<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05) than those treated with BS or SS. Surfaces treated with BS or SS were not significantly different from the untreated control surfaces (p<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05). AO powder produced the greatest profilometric changes, whereas BS and SS produced similar profilometric changes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Air-polishing with SS or BS does not alter enamel roughness, although it may have mild profilometric effects during stain removal procedures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 123-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pad.2011.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0393996011001028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0393996011001028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Valutazione della rugosità dello smalto in seguito a trattamenti di air-polishing eseguiti con vetri bioattivi
Objectives
To evaluate the roughness of the enamel surface after air-polishing.
Materials and methods
Fifteen specimens of enamel-MACOR treated with modified-Bioglass 45S5 (SS), aluminum trioxide (AO), or sodium bicarbonate (BS) were analyzed using confocal (CLSM) and atomic force (AFM) microscopy to identify profilometric and micro- and nano-roughness changes.
Results
AO-treated samples were significantly rougher (p > 0.05) than those treated with BS or SS. Surfaces treated with BS or SS were not significantly different from the untreated control surfaces (p > 0.05). AO powder produced the greatest profilometric changes, whereas BS and SS produced similar profilometric changes.
Conclusions
Air-polishing with SS or BS does not alter enamel roughness, although it may have mild profilometric effects during stain removal procedures.