javal角膜测定仪、nidek自体角膜测定仪与角膜分析系统(EyeSys)健康眼角膜测量值的比较

M.J. Giráldez, E. Yebra-Pimentel, M.A. Parafita, S. Escandón, A. Cerviño, M.V. Pérez
{"title":"javal角膜测定仪、nidek自体角膜测定仪与角膜分析系统(EyeSys)健康眼角膜测量值的比较","authors":"M.J. Giráldez,&nbsp;E. Yebra-Pimentel,&nbsp;M.A. Parafita,&nbsp;S. Escandón,&nbsp;A. Cerviño,&nbsp;M.V. Pérez","doi":"10.1016/S0892-8967(01)00052-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study we compare three different keratometric methods normally used in contact lens fitting to assesses the effect of contact lenses on corneal curvature. Measurements were obtained from 100 normal eyes using a Javal ophthalmometer, an Nidek autokeratometer, and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys) to compare the keratometric readings obtained by these three instruments. Using regression analysis and bias (the mean of the difference compared with zero), we found good agreement among the instruments. However, the 95% confidence limits showed a lack of agreement between them. Although the differences between instruments were clinically acceptable, relevant differences were found using the 95% confidence limits. We should not assume that the results of the different keratometric systems can be interchanged in contact lens fitting and follow-up examinations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80286,"journal":{"name":"International contact lens clinic (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0892-8967(01)00052-9","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of keratometric values of healthy eyes measured by javal keratometer, nidek autokeratometer, and corneal analysis system (EyeSys)\",\"authors\":\"M.J. Giráldez,&nbsp;E. Yebra-Pimentel,&nbsp;M.A. Parafita,&nbsp;S. Escandón,&nbsp;A. Cerviño,&nbsp;M.V. Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0892-8967(01)00052-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study we compare three different keratometric methods normally used in contact lens fitting to assesses the effect of contact lenses on corneal curvature. Measurements were obtained from 100 normal eyes using a Javal ophthalmometer, an Nidek autokeratometer, and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys) to compare the keratometric readings obtained by these three instruments. Using regression analysis and bias (the mean of the difference compared with zero), we found good agreement among the instruments. However, the 95% confidence limits showed a lack of agreement between them. Although the differences between instruments were clinically acceptable, relevant differences were found using the 95% confidence limits. We should not assume that the results of the different keratometric systems can be interchanged in contact lens fitting and follow-up examinations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International contact lens clinic (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 33-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0892-8967(01)00052-9\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International contact lens clinic (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892896701000529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International contact lens clinic (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892896701000529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在本研究中,我们比较了通常用于隐形眼镜配戴的三种不同的角膜测量方法,以评估隐形眼镜对角膜曲率的影响。使用Javal眼压计、Nidek自动角膜度数计和角膜分析系统(EyeSys)对100只正常眼睛进行测量,比较这三种仪器获得的角膜度数。使用回归分析和偏差(与零相比,差异的平均值),我们发现工具之间的一致性很好。然而,95%的置信限显示他们之间缺乏一致性。虽然器械之间的差异在临床上是可接受的,但使用95%置信限发现了相关差异。我们不应该假设不同的角膜测量系统的结果可以在隐形眼镜配戴和随访检查中互换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of keratometric values of healthy eyes measured by javal keratometer, nidek autokeratometer, and corneal analysis system (EyeSys)

In this study we compare three different keratometric methods normally used in contact lens fitting to assesses the effect of contact lenses on corneal curvature. Measurements were obtained from 100 normal eyes using a Javal ophthalmometer, an Nidek autokeratometer, and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys) to compare the keratometric readings obtained by these three instruments. Using regression analysis and bias (the mean of the difference compared with zero), we found good agreement among the instruments. However, the 95% confidence limits showed a lack of agreement between them. Although the differences between instruments were clinically acceptable, relevant differences were found using the 95% confidence limits. We should not assume that the results of the different keratometric systems can be interchanged in contact lens fitting and follow-up examinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Value of Flow-Mediated Vasodilation in Brachial Artery and Fingertip Artery for Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Corneal pannus resolved with silicone hydrogel contact lenses: a case series Patient and practitioner perspectives on PureVision continuous wear lenses Cumulative clinical results and projected incident rates of microbial keratitis with PureVision™ silicone hydrogel lenses “Two steps forward, one step back”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1