{"title":"写作反抗:与非洲民族主义的接触,1957-67,特伦斯·兰杰著。Woodbridge: James Currey, 2013。12, 206页。ISBN 9781847010711。£19.99。","authors":"J. Pinfold","doi":"10.1017/s0305862x00021580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing revolt: an engagement with African nationalism, 1957-67, by Terence Ranger. Woodbridge: James Currey, 2013. xii, 206 pp. ISBN 9781847010711. £19.99.Shortly after I arrived at Rhodes House as Librarian in 1993 I was taken down into the basement stacks and shown a large number of boxes which contained the unsorted papers of a minor academic historian, whose name meant nothing to me then and little more to me now. It was pointed out that these were taking up a great deal of space and were unlikely ever to receive much interest from researchers. The message was clear - the Library should be focussing its efforts on collecting the papers of those who had played their part in African history, not those who had merely studied it. I tended then (and still tend) to agree with this view, yet when, some four years later, Terry Ranger, then soon to retire as Rhodes Professor of Race Relations at Oxford, approached the Library about taking his own even more voluminous collection, I had no hesitation in accepting. This book, which draws to a very large extent on the Ranger papers now at Rhodes House, shows why, for it is much more than the memoir of a pioneer in the history of African nationalism and resistance to colonial rule, it is also that of someone who witnessed and indeed participated in a key phase of that struggle. As Ranger's great friend Stanlake Samkange wrote in 1963 in a letter quoted in this book (p.153):If anybody deserves being a professor of history it is you - who have not only tried to unearth a good deal of it but have also lived it and contributed to it.Ranger himself emphasises this duality when he writes in the preface (p. xi) that this book is intended as both history and historiography. The constant interplay between these two strands runs through the entire book, and shows how his experiences in mid-twentieth century Southern Rhodesia (as it then was) helped create the scholar that he has become.At its heart, this book is the story of how a liberal humanist confronted the Southern Rhodesia of white minority rule and segregation and found the moral courage to oppose it and embrace the cause of African nationalism, a course which led eventually, as is well-known, to his expulsion from the country in 1963. In this, of course, he was not unique, but his academic training as an historian, allied to the fact that he was, in his own words, a \"natural dissident\" who opposed repression wherever it came from, including the \"coerced unity\" which became a feature of so many African nationalist movements (pp.181-2), means that he was always able to maintain a sense of independence as well as engagement. He quotes approvingly (p.148) from a letter of James Robert Chikerema: \"If you want to have him [Ranger] as a member then you have to accept that he will speak his mind\".As with all insiders' memoirs, the author does indeed \"speak his mind\" in this book, but he is also too good a historian to ignore the views of others (in a revealing phrase early on he tells us he was brought up to believe that the \"worst civic crime possible [was] to jump a queue\"), and the text is littered with often lengthy extracts from letters both to and from a wide variety of activists and observers of the time, as well as from the diaries of his friend and university colleague, John Reed. …","PeriodicalId":89063,"journal":{"name":"African research & documentation","volume":"1 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing revolt: an engagement with African nationalism, 1957-67, by Terence Ranger. Woodbridge: James Currey, 2013. xii, 206 pp. ISBN 9781847010711. £19.99.\",\"authors\":\"J. Pinfold\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0305862x00021580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Writing revolt: an engagement with African nationalism, 1957-67, by Terence Ranger. Woodbridge: James Currey, 2013. xii, 206 pp. ISBN 9781847010711. £19.99.Shortly after I arrived at Rhodes House as Librarian in 1993 I was taken down into the basement stacks and shown a large number of boxes which contained the unsorted papers of a minor academic historian, whose name meant nothing to me then and little more to me now. It was pointed out that these were taking up a great deal of space and were unlikely ever to receive much interest from researchers. The message was clear - the Library should be focussing its efforts on collecting the papers of those who had played their part in African history, not those who had merely studied it. I tended then (and still tend) to agree with this view, yet when, some four years later, Terry Ranger, then soon to retire as Rhodes Professor of Race Relations at Oxford, approached the Library about taking his own even more voluminous collection, I had no hesitation in accepting. This book, which draws to a very large extent on the Ranger papers now at Rhodes House, shows why, for it is much more than the memoir of a pioneer in the history of African nationalism and resistance to colonial rule, it is also that of someone who witnessed and indeed participated in a key phase of that struggle. As Ranger's great friend Stanlake Samkange wrote in 1963 in a letter quoted in this book (p.153):If anybody deserves being a professor of history it is you - who have not only tried to unearth a good deal of it but have also lived it and contributed to it.Ranger himself emphasises this duality when he writes in the preface (p. xi) that this book is intended as both history and historiography. The constant interplay between these two strands runs through the entire book, and shows how his experiences in mid-twentieth century Southern Rhodesia (as it then was) helped create the scholar that he has become.At its heart, this book is the story of how a liberal humanist confronted the Southern Rhodesia of white minority rule and segregation and found the moral courage to oppose it and embrace the cause of African nationalism, a course which led eventually, as is well-known, to his expulsion from the country in 1963. In this, of course, he was not unique, but his academic training as an historian, allied to the fact that he was, in his own words, a \\\"natural dissident\\\" who opposed repression wherever it came from, including the \\\"coerced unity\\\" which became a feature of so many African nationalist movements (pp.181-2), means that he was always able to maintain a sense of independence as well as engagement. He quotes approvingly (p.148) from a letter of James Robert Chikerema: \\\"If you want to have him [Ranger] as a member then you have to accept that he will speak his mind\\\".As with all insiders' memoirs, the author does indeed \\\"speak his mind\\\" in this book, but he is also too good a historian to ignore the views of others (in a revealing phrase early on he tells us he was brought up to believe that the \\\"worst civic crime possible [was] to jump a queue\\\"), and the text is littered with often lengthy extracts from letters both to and from a wide variety of activists and observers of the time, as well as from the diaries of his friend and university colleague, John Reed. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":89063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African research & documentation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African research & documentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305862x00021580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African research & documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305862x00021580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
写作反抗:与非洲民族主义的接触,1957-67,特伦斯·兰杰著。Woodbridge: James Currey, 2013。12, 206页。ISBN 9781847010711。£19.99。1993年,我以图书管理员的身份来到罗兹馆不久,我就被带到地下室的书库里,看到了一大堆盒子,里面装着一位小学术历史学家未分类的论文,他的名字当时对我来说毫无意义,现在对我来说也没什么意义。有人指出,它们占用了大量的空间,而且不太可能引起研究人员的太多兴趣。这个信息很明确——图书馆应该集中精力收集那些在非洲历史上发挥过作用的人的论文,而不是那些仅仅研究过非洲历史的人的论文。我当时倾向于(现在仍然倾向于)同意这种观点,然而,大约四年后,特里·兰杰(Terry Ranger)——当时他很快就要从牛津大学罗兹种族关系教授的职位上退休了——找到图书馆,想把他自己的更大量的藏书拿走,我毫不犹豫地接受了。这本书在很大程度上借鉴了如今保存在罗兹之家的《游侠》(Ranger)论文,它说明了为什么,因为它不仅仅是非洲民族主义和抵抗殖民统治历史上的一位先驱的回忆录,它也是一位见证并真正参与了这场斗争关键阶段的人的回忆录。正如兰杰的好朋友斯坦莱克·萨姆坎格(Stanlake Samkange)在1963年的一封信中所写的那样,这本书引用了这封信(第153页):如果有人值得成为一名历史教授,那就是你——你不仅试图发掘大量的历史,而且还经历了历史,并为之做出了贡献。兰杰自己强调这种双重性,当他在序言中写道(第xi页),这本书的目的是作为历史和史学。这两条线索之间不断的相互作用贯穿了整本书,并展示了他在20世纪中期南罗得西亚(当时是南罗得西亚)的经历如何帮助他成为了现在的学者。这本书的核心是一个自由人文主义者如何面对南罗得西亚的白人少数统治和种族隔离,并找到道德勇气反对它,并接受非洲民族主义事业的故事,这一过程最终导致他在1963年被驱逐出境,这是众所周知的。当然,在这一点上,他并不是独一无二的,但他作为历史学家的学术训练,加上他是一个“天生的持不同政见者”,用他自己的话来说,他反对来自任何地方的镇压,包括成为许多非洲民族主义运动特征的“强制统一”(第181-2页),这意味着他总是能够保持一种独立感和参与感。他赞许地引用了James Robert Chikerema的一封信(第148页):“如果你想让他(Ranger)成为你的一员,那么你必须接受他会说出自己的想法。”与所有内部人士的回忆录,作者确实“说出他的想法”这本书,但他也太好历史学家忽视他人的观点(在揭示短语在早期他告诉我们他长大相信“最糟糕的公民犯罪可能是跳队列”),和文本通常充斥着冗长的提取从字母都和各种各样的激进分子和观察者的时候,从他的朋友的日记和大学的同事,约翰·里德。...
Writing revolt: an engagement with African nationalism, 1957-67, by Terence Ranger. Woodbridge: James Currey, 2013. xii, 206 pp. ISBN 9781847010711. £19.99.
Writing revolt: an engagement with African nationalism, 1957-67, by Terence Ranger. Woodbridge: James Currey, 2013. xii, 206 pp. ISBN 9781847010711. £19.99.Shortly after I arrived at Rhodes House as Librarian in 1993 I was taken down into the basement stacks and shown a large number of boxes which contained the unsorted papers of a minor academic historian, whose name meant nothing to me then and little more to me now. It was pointed out that these were taking up a great deal of space and were unlikely ever to receive much interest from researchers. The message was clear - the Library should be focussing its efforts on collecting the papers of those who had played their part in African history, not those who had merely studied it. I tended then (and still tend) to agree with this view, yet when, some four years later, Terry Ranger, then soon to retire as Rhodes Professor of Race Relations at Oxford, approached the Library about taking his own even more voluminous collection, I had no hesitation in accepting. This book, which draws to a very large extent on the Ranger papers now at Rhodes House, shows why, for it is much more than the memoir of a pioneer in the history of African nationalism and resistance to colonial rule, it is also that of someone who witnessed and indeed participated in a key phase of that struggle. As Ranger's great friend Stanlake Samkange wrote in 1963 in a letter quoted in this book (p.153):If anybody deserves being a professor of history it is you - who have not only tried to unearth a good deal of it but have also lived it and contributed to it.Ranger himself emphasises this duality when he writes in the preface (p. xi) that this book is intended as both history and historiography. The constant interplay between these two strands runs through the entire book, and shows how his experiences in mid-twentieth century Southern Rhodesia (as it then was) helped create the scholar that he has become.At its heart, this book is the story of how a liberal humanist confronted the Southern Rhodesia of white minority rule and segregation and found the moral courage to oppose it and embrace the cause of African nationalism, a course which led eventually, as is well-known, to his expulsion from the country in 1963. In this, of course, he was not unique, but his academic training as an historian, allied to the fact that he was, in his own words, a "natural dissident" who opposed repression wherever it came from, including the "coerced unity" which became a feature of so many African nationalist movements (pp.181-2), means that he was always able to maintain a sense of independence as well as engagement. He quotes approvingly (p.148) from a letter of James Robert Chikerema: "If you want to have him [Ranger] as a member then you have to accept that he will speak his mind".As with all insiders' memoirs, the author does indeed "speak his mind" in this book, but he is also too good a historian to ignore the views of others (in a revealing phrase early on he tells us he was brought up to believe that the "worst civic crime possible [was] to jump a queue"), and the text is littered with often lengthy extracts from letters both to and from a wide variety of activists and observers of the time, as well as from the diaries of his friend and university colleague, John Reed. …