{"title":"《环境保护主义:死亡与复活","authors":"M. Sagoff","doi":"10.1017/CBO9780511817472.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientists, experts, and other environmental professionals debate technical concepts such as \"ecosystem services,\" \"biodiversity,\" \"ecological resilience,\" \"benefits valuation\" and \"sustainability.\" As a result, the environmental movement has ceased to be a popular political cause and become an academic research program.","PeriodicalId":82464,"journal":{"name":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","volume":"27 1","pages":"2-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/CBO9780511817472.010","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmentalism: Death and Resurrection\",\"authors\":\"M. Sagoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/CBO9780511817472.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientists, experts, and other environmental professionals debate technical concepts such as \\\"ecosystem services,\\\" \\\"biodiversity,\\\" \\\"ecological resilience,\\\" \\\"benefits valuation\\\" and \\\"sustainability.\\\" As a result, the environmental movement has ceased to be a popular political cause and become an academic research program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"2-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/CBO9780511817472.010\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817472.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817472.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scientists, experts, and other environmental professionals debate technical concepts such as "ecosystem services," "biodiversity," "ecological resilience," "benefits valuation" and "sustainability." As a result, the environmental movement has ceased to be a popular political cause and become an academic research program.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
