呼吁发表关于一次性电子烟的论文

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Addiction Pub Date : 2023-07-22 DOI:10.1111/add.16307
{"title":"呼吁发表关于一次性电子烟的论文","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/add.16307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>E-cigarettes have loomed large in tobacco control, regulatory science, addiction research and policy debates over the last decade. Early e-cigarettes were disposable devices that closely resembled cigarettes (widely described as cigalikes) and were relatively poor at delivering nicotine [<span>1, 2</span>]. Subsequent generations of e-cigarettes were developed that were rechargeable and included refillable tanks or replaceable cartridges or (later) pods [<span>3</span>], and typically delivered nicotine increasingly more effectively than earlier devices [<span>4, 5</span>]. Research established that nicotine e-cigarettes are more effective for smoking cessation than nicotine replacement therapy [<span>6</span>], less harmful than cigarettes [<span>7</span>] and principally attracted people who had previously smoked cigarettes regularly, or were likely to have done so in the future [<span>8</span>].</p><p>Since around 2021, a new form of disposable e-cigarettes has become popular in many countries. These disposable devices typically deliver nicotine more effectively by using a similar technology to pod devices and including a relatively high-strength nicotine salt e-liquid (20 mg/ml), are sold cheaply (for as little as £2.99 in the UK), and under a variety of brand names (e.g., ‘Crystal Bar’, ‘Elf Bar’, ‘Lost Mary’). From 2021 to 2022, use of disposable e-cigarettes rose sharply in Great Britain as these new products rapidly became popular among younger people (&lt;25 year-olds) [<span>9, 10</span>]. Similar trends have been observed elsewhere, including among US, Australian and New Zealand youth [<span>11-16</span>]. The speed and extent of the increase in use of disposable e-cigarettes suggests a sizeable proportion of the youth population who were likely to have never smoked may now have been attracted to use these products.</p><p>From a public health point of view, the aim is to maximise the opportunity e-cigarettes present to help people to quit smoking, while minimising the risks of e-cigarettes being used by large numbers of young people who have never smoked. There is an urgent need for new research to estimate their likely public health impact of disposable e-cigarettes and to inform appropriate regulation.</p><p><b>Guest Editors:</b></p><p>Jamie Brown, University College London Tobacco and Alcohol Research Group, UK – <span>[email protected]</span></p><p>Suzanne Colby, Brown University School of Public Health, USA – <span>[email protected]</span></p><p>Natalie Walker, University of Auckland National Institute for Health Innovation, New Zealand – <span>[email protected]</span></p><p>Please direct any general enquiries to Molly Jarvis, Editorial Manager and Commissioning Editor – <span>[email protected]</span></p><p><b>Deadline for submissions: 31 December 2023.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":"118 10","pages":"1831-1832"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16307","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Call for papers on disposable e-cigarettes\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.16307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>E-cigarettes have loomed large in tobacco control, regulatory science, addiction research and policy debates over the last decade. Early e-cigarettes were disposable devices that closely resembled cigarettes (widely described as cigalikes) and were relatively poor at delivering nicotine [<span>1, 2</span>]. Subsequent generations of e-cigarettes were developed that were rechargeable and included refillable tanks or replaceable cartridges or (later) pods [<span>3</span>], and typically delivered nicotine increasingly more effectively than earlier devices [<span>4, 5</span>]. Research established that nicotine e-cigarettes are more effective for smoking cessation than nicotine replacement therapy [<span>6</span>], less harmful than cigarettes [<span>7</span>] and principally attracted people who had previously smoked cigarettes regularly, or were likely to have done so in the future [<span>8</span>].</p><p>Since around 2021, a new form of disposable e-cigarettes has become popular in many countries. These disposable devices typically deliver nicotine more effectively by using a similar technology to pod devices and including a relatively high-strength nicotine salt e-liquid (20 mg/ml), are sold cheaply (for as little as £2.99 in the UK), and under a variety of brand names (e.g., ‘Crystal Bar’, ‘Elf Bar’, ‘Lost Mary’). From 2021 to 2022, use of disposable e-cigarettes rose sharply in Great Britain as these new products rapidly became popular among younger people (&lt;25 year-olds) [<span>9, 10</span>]. Similar trends have been observed elsewhere, including among US, Australian and New Zealand youth [<span>11-16</span>]. The speed and extent of the increase in use of disposable e-cigarettes suggests a sizeable proportion of the youth population who were likely to have never smoked may now have been attracted to use these products.</p><p>From a public health point of view, the aim is to maximise the opportunity e-cigarettes present to help people to quit smoking, while minimising the risks of e-cigarettes being used by large numbers of young people who have never smoked. There is an urgent need for new research to estimate their likely public health impact of disposable e-cigarettes and to inform appropriate regulation.</p><p><b>Guest Editors:</b></p><p>Jamie Brown, University College London Tobacco and Alcohol Research Group, UK – <span>[email protected]</span></p><p>Suzanne Colby, Brown University School of Public Health, USA – <span>[email protected]</span></p><p>Natalie Walker, University of Auckland National Institute for Health Innovation, New Zealand – <span>[email protected]</span></p><p>Please direct any general enquiries to Molly Jarvis, Editorial Manager and Commissioning Editor – <span>[email protected]</span></p><p><b>Deadline for submissions: 31 December 2023.</b></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\"118 10\",\"pages\":\"1831-1832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16307\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16307\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16307","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,电子烟在烟草控制、监管科学、成瘾研究和政策辩论中占据了重要地位。早期的电子烟是一次性设备,与香烟(通常被称为cigalikes)非常相似,并且尼古丁的输送能力相对较差[1,2]。随后的几代电子烟被开发为可充电的,包括可重新填充的罐或可更换的烟筒或(后来的)烟筒[3],并且通常比早期的设备更有效地输送尼古丁[4,5]。研究表明,尼古丁电子烟比尼古丁替代疗法更有效戒烟[6],比香烟危害小[7],主要吸引以前经常吸烟或将来可能吸烟的人群[8]。从2021年左右开始,一种新型的一次性电子烟在许多国家流行起来。这些一次性电子烟通常使用与电子烟类似的技术,并含有相对高强度的尼古丁盐电子液体(20毫克/毫升),更有效地输送尼古丁,售价便宜(在英国低至2.99英镑),并且有各种各样的品牌名称(例如“水晶棒”、“精灵棒”、“迷失玛丽”)。从2021年到2022年,英国一次性电子烟的使用量急剧上升,因为这些新产品在年轻人(<25岁)中迅速流行[9,10]。在其他地方也观察到类似的趋势,包括美国、澳大利亚和新西兰的青年[11-16]。一次性电子烟使用增加的速度和程度表明,相当大一部分可能从未吸过烟的年轻人现在可能被吸引使用这些产品。从公共卫生的角度来看,目标是最大限度地利用电子烟帮助人们戒烟的机会,同时最大限度地降低大量从未吸烟的年轻人使用电子烟的风险。迫切需要进行新的研究,以估计一次性电子烟可能对公共卫生产生的影响,并为适当的监管提供信息。特邀编辑:Jamie Brown,英国伦敦大学学院烟草和酒精研究小组- [email protected]Suzanne Colby,美国布朗大学公共卫生学院- [email protected]Natalie Walker,新西兰奥克兰大学国家健康创新研究所- [email protected]请直接向Molly Jarvis咨询,编辑经理和委托编辑- [email protected]投稿截止日期:2023年12月31日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Call for papers on disposable e-cigarettes

E-cigarettes have loomed large in tobacco control, regulatory science, addiction research and policy debates over the last decade. Early e-cigarettes were disposable devices that closely resembled cigarettes (widely described as cigalikes) and were relatively poor at delivering nicotine [1, 2]. Subsequent generations of e-cigarettes were developed that were rechargeable and included refillable tanks or replaceable cartridges or (later) pods [3], and typically delivered nicotine increasingly more effectively than earlier devices [4, 5]. Research established that nicotine e-cigarettes are more effective for smoking cessation than nicotine replacement therapy [6], less harmful than cigarettes [7] and principally attracted people who had previously smoked cigarettes regularly, or were likely to have done so in the future [8].

Since around 2021, a new form of disposable e-cigarettes has become popular in many countries. These disposable devices typically deliver nicotine more effectively by using a similar technology to pod devices and including a relatively high-strength nicotine salt e-liquid (20 mg/ml), are sold cheaply (for as little as £2.99 in the UK), and under a variety of brand names (e.g., ‘Crystal Bar’, ‘Elf Bar’, ‘Lost Mary’). From 2021 to 2022, use of disposable e-cigarettes rose sharply in Great Britain as these new products rapidly became popular among younger people (<25 year-olds) [9, 10]. Similar trends have been observed elsewhere, including among US, Australian and New Zealand youth [11-16]. The speed and extent of the increase in use of disposable e-cigarettes suggests a sizeable proportion of the youth population who were likely to have never smoked may now have been attracted to use these products.

From a public health point of view, the aim is to maximise the opportunity e-cigarettes present to help people to quit smoking, while minimising the risks of e-cigarettes being used by large numbers of young people who have never smoked. There is an urgent need for new research to estimate their likely public health impact of disposable e-cigarettes and to inform appropriate regulation.

Guest Editors:

Jamie Brown, University College London Tobacco and Alcohol Research Group, UK – [email protected]

Suzanne Colby, Brown University School of Public Health, USA – [email protected]

Natalie Walker, University of Auckland National Institute for Health Innovation, New Zealand – [email protected]

Please direct any general enquiries to Molly Jarvis, Editorial Manager and Commissioning Editor – [email protected]

Deadline for submissions: 31 December 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a peer-led emergency department behavioral intervention on non-fatal opioid overdose: 18-month outcome in the Navigator randomized controlled trial. Client preferences for the design and delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment services: Results from a best-worst scaling task. School-based interventions targeting substance use among young people in low-and-middle-income countries: A scoping review. The relationship between cannabis and nicotine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. What is the prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroid use among women? A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1