{"title":"平衡理论","authors":"Raymond D. Kent","doi":"10.1044/SSOD18.1.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One major way of putting into view the scientific progress in an area of research is by examining the theoretical currents that help to organize the data and to guide future experiments. Research in speech production has been shaped by several different theories, but three in particular have had a profound influence: general motor program theory, dynamic systems theory, and internal models. This paper discusses how these three theories evolved and influenced contemporary conceptions of how speech production is controlled.","PeriodicalId":88630,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on speech science and orofacial disorders","volume":"18 1","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory in the Balance\",\"authors\":\"Raymond D. Kent\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/SSOD18.1.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract One major way of putting into view the scientific progress in an area of research is by examining the theoretical currents that help to organize the data and to guide future experiments. Research in speech production has been shaped by several different theories, but three in particular have had a profound influence: general motor program theory, dynamic systems theory, and internal models. This paper discusses how these three theories evolved and influenced contemporary conceptions of how speech production is controlled.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on speech science and orofacial disorders\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"15-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on speech science and orofacial disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/SSOD18.1.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on speech science and orofacial disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/SSOD18.1.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract One major way of putting into view the scientific progress in an area of research is by examining the theoretical currents that help to organize the data and to guide future experiments. Research in speech production has been shaped by several different theories, but three in particular have had a profound influence: general motor program theory, dynamic systems theory, and internal models. This paper discusses how these three theories evolved and influenced contemporary conceptions of how speech production is controlled.