实验与准实验:它们能得出相同的答案吗?

W. Shadish, D. T. Heinsman
{"title":"实验与准实验:它们能得出相同的答案吗?","authors":"W. Shadish, D. T. Heinsman","doi":"10.1037/E495592006-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Life would be ever so much easier if quasi-experiments yielded just as good causal inferences as randomized experiments. Of course, the term \"quasi-experiment\" covers a multitude of designs. Here it refers to the workhorse of the quasi-experimental design literature: the nonequivalent control group design that includes a treatment group, a control group not receiving treatment, and a posttest for both, but where the assignment of subjects to conditions is not controlled by the researcher, and is certainly not random.","PeriodicalId":76229,"journal":{"name":"NIDA research monograph","volume":"170 1","pages":"147-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiments versus quasi-experiments: do they yield the same answer?\",\"authors\":\"W. Shadish, D. T. Heinsman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/E495592006-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Life would be ever so much easier if quasi-experiments yielded just as good causal inferences as randomized experiments. Of course, the term \\\"quasi-experiment\\\" covers a multitude of designs. Here it refers to the workhorse of the quasi-experimental design literature: the nonequivalent control group design that includes a treatment group, a control group not receiving treatment, and a posttest for both, but where the assignment of subjects to conditions is not controlled by the researcher, and is certainly not random.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIDA research monograph\",\"volume\":\"170 1\",\"pages\":\"147-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIDA research monograph\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/E495592006-008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIDA research monograph","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/E495592006-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

如果准实验能产生和随机实验一样好的因果推论,生活就会容易得多。当然,“准实验”一词涵盖了多种设计。在这里,它指的是准实验设计文献的主要内容:非等效对照组设计,包括治疗组、未接受治疗的对照组和两组的后测,但受试者的条件分配不由研究人员控制,当然也不是随机的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiments versus quasi-experiments: do they yield the same answer?
Life would be ever so much easier if quasi-experiments yielded just as good causal inferences as randomized experiments. Of course, the term "quasi-experiment" covers a multitude of designs. Here it refers to the workhorse of the quasi-experimental design literature: the nonequivalent control group design that includes a treatment group, a control group not receiving treatment, and a posttest for both, but where the assignment of subjects to conditions is not controlled by the researcher, and is certainly not random.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in the elimination and resurgence of alcohol-maintained behavior in rats and the effects of naltrexone. Costoclavicular approach to the brachial plexus block: simple or double injection? Participatory governance and policy diffusion in local governments in Korea Implementation of participatory budgeting Measuring and Explaining Subjective Well-being in Korea EVALUATION OF DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT MEDICATIONS: CONCORDANCE BETWEEN CLINICAL AND PRECLINICAL STUDIES.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1