以初级膝关节置换术为例,在关节置换术中心(EndoProthetikZentrum)基于PROMs识别潜在高危患者。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-04 DOI:10.1055/a-1753-9968
Katrin Osmanski-Zenk, Annett Klinder, Martin Darowski, Martin Goosmann, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Martin Ellenrieder
{"title":"以初级膝关节置换术为例,在关节置换术中心(EndoProthetikZentrum)基于PROMs识别潜在高危患者。","authors":"Katrin Osmanski-Zenk, Annett Klinder, Martin Darowski, Martin Goosmann, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Martin Ellenrieder","doi":"10.1055/a-1753-9968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The subjective evaluation of the patient's state of health with the help of Patient-reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) provides valuable information for assessing the treatment outcome and for treatment planning. However, the use of PROMs in the field of arthroplasty is not mandatory, so that there is a lack of standardised recording and interpretation. The present study aims to identify patients, who have not achieved the intended treatment goals with regard to pain, function and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty, more easily in the future on the basis of postoperative PROMs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data collection (for 3-month postoperative follow-up) included a standardised clinical follow-up (NU) and a questionnaire of different PROMs (Oxford Knee Score [OKS], OKS Pain Score [OKSS] and EndoCert Risk Score [ERS]). During the specialist follow-up examination, it was decided whether further medical therapy had to be initiated. Accordingly, patients were grouped into four post-treatment categories (NU not required/further diagnostics/new prescription/revision required).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For individual scores and questions, there were significant differences between the respective groups of consequences resulting from the follow-up examination. The OKS, OKS Pain Score and the ERS are suitable for detecting thresholds to determine the need for a follow-up examination. The postoperative thresholds of the scores are 24 for the OKS total score, 52 for the OKS pain score and 4 for the ERS pain intensity score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the initial three months after knee arthroplasty, certain PROMs are suitable for identifying patients for whom further diagnostics and therapy are indicated. In particular, the OKS and the pain intensity score of the ERS are suitable for detecting a potentially unfavourable development in rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":51219,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","volume":"1 1","pages":"637-647"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Potentially High-risk Patients on the Basis of PROMs in a Certified Centre for Joint Replacement (EndoProthetikZentrum) Using the Example of Primary Knee Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Katrin Osmanski-Zenk, Annett Klinder, Martin Darowski, Martin Goosmann, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Martin Ellenrieder\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1753-9968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The subjective evaluation of the patient's state of health with the help of Patient-reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) provides valuable information for assessing the treatment outcome and for treatment planning. However, the use of PROMs in the field of arthroplasty is not mandatory, so that there is a lack of standardised recording and interpretation. The present study aims to identify patients, who have not achieved the intended treatment goals with regard to pain, function and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty, more easily in the future on the basis of postoperative PROMs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data collection (for 3-month postoperative follow-up) included a standardised clinical follow-up (NU) and a questionnaire of different PROMs (Oxford Knee Score [OKS], OKS Pain Score [OKSS] and EndoCert Risk Score [ERS]). During the specialist follow-up examination, it was decided whether further medical therapy had to be initiated. Accordingly, patients were grouped into four post-treatment categories (NU not required/further diagnostics/new prescription/revision required).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For individual scores and questions, there were significant differences between the respective groups of consequences resulting from the follow-up examination. The OKS, OKS Pain Score and the ERS are suitable for detecting thresholds to determine the need for a follow-up examination. The postoperative thresholds of the scores are 24 for the OKS total score, 52 for the OKS pain score and 4 for the ERS pain intensity score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the initial three months after knee arthroplasty, certain PROMs are suitable for identifying patients for whom further diagnostics and therapy are indicated. In particular, the OKS and the pain intensity score of the ERS are suitable for detecting a potentially unfavourable development in rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"637-647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1753-9968\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1753-9968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:借助患者报告结果测量(PROMs)对患者健康状况的主观评估为评估治疗结果和制定治疗计划提供了有价值的信息。然而,PROMs在关节成形术领域的使用并不是强制性的,因此缺乏标准化的记录和解释。本研究旨在通过全膝关节置换术后疼痛、功能和生活质量方面未达到预期治疗目标的患者,在术后prom的基础上更容易识别。材料和方法:数据收集(术后3个月随访)包括标准化临床随访(NU)和不同PROMs问卷(牛津膝关节评分[OKS]、OKS疼痛评分[OKSS]和EndoCert风险评分[ERS])。在专科随访检查期间,决定是否必须开始进一步的药物治疗。据此,将患者分为4个治疗后类别(不需要/进一步诊断/新处方/需要修订)。结果:在个体得分和问题上,随访检查的结果在各组之间存在显著差异。OKS、OKS疼痛评分和ERS适用于检测阈值,以确定是否需要进行随访检查。术后评分阈值为OKS总分24分,OKS疼痛评分52分,ERS疼痛强度评分4分。结论:在膝关节置换术后的最初三个月,某些PROMs适合于确定需要进一步诊断和治疗的患者。特别是,OKS和ERS的疼痛强度评分适用于检测全膝关节置换术后康复中潜在的不利发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification of Potentially High-risk Patients on the Basis of PROMs in a Certified Centre for Joint Replacement (EndoProthetikZentrum) Using the Example of Primary Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: The subjective evaluation of the patient's state of health with the help of Patient-reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) provides valuable information for assessing the treatment outcome and for treatment planning. However, the use of PROMs in the field of arthroplasty is not mandatory, so that there is a lack of standardised recording and interpretation. The present study aims to identify patients, who have not achieved the intended treatment goals with regard to pain, function and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty, more easily in the future on the basis of postoperative PROMs.

Material and methods: Data collection (for 3-month postoperative follow-up) included a standardised clinical follow-up (NU) and a questionnaire of different PROMs (Oxford Knee Score [OKS], OKS Pain Score [OKSS] and EndoCert Risk Score [ERS]). During the specialist follow-up examination, it was decided whether further medical therapy had to be initiated. Accordingly, patients were grouped into four post-treatment categories (NU not required/further diagnostics/new prescription/revision required).

Results: For individual scores and questions, there were significant differences between the respective groups of consequences resulting from the follow-up examination. The OKS, OKS Pain Score and the ERS are suitable for detecting thresholds to determine the need for a follow-up examination. The postoperative thresholds of the scores are 24 for the OKS total score, 52 for the OKS pain score and 4 for the ERS pain intensity score.

Conclusion: In the initial three months after knee arthroplasty, certain PROMs are suitable for identifying patients for whom further diagnostics and therapy are indicated. In particular, the OKS and the pain intensity score of the ERS are suitable for detecting a potentially unfavourable development in rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Das Forum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aus einer Hand Aktuelles aus Klinik, Wissenschaft und Forschung Ein unabhängiges Peer-Review-Verfahren sichert Qualität, Relevanz und Plausibilität der Daten Modernes Layout: Klare Gliederung, farbige Abbildungen, strukturierte Tabellen Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aktuell: Berichte und Reportagen zu den wichtigsten Themen im Fach
期刊最新文献
Long-term Outcomes after Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy - A Retrospective Study of 69 Patients. S2k Guideline for Tibial Plateau Fractures - Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Long-term Outcomes in Orthogeriatric Co-management: a Literature Review. Non-drainage Offers Faster Proprioceptive and Functional Recovery, and More Clinical Benefits for Patients following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Drainage. Fractures in Childhood and Young Adulthood According to Maternal Smoking in Late Pregnancy. A Danish Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1