主动脉夹层。

J. Phalen, J. Saigh
{"title":"主动脉夹层。","authors":"J. Phalen, J. Saigh","doi":"10.1055/b-0034-92220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ACUTE ASCENDING AORTIC DISSECTION is a serious condition with significant mortality requiring prompt diagnosis and surgical treatment as mortality rates increase hourly without intervention. There are a number of modalities currently used to diagnose aortic dissection, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), each with different strengths and weaknesses in regard to speed, accuracy, and ease of performance. There exists a balance between rapid diagnosis with comprehensive information regarding anatomic detail, vascular branch involvement, false lumen identification, and speed with which the diagnosis can be made to expedite potential surgical treatment. The optimal diagnostic mode for identifying ascending aortic dissection remains controversial. Additionally, the various methods of imaging used to evaluate for aortic dissection all carry potential disadvantages of artifact within the image, complicating the diagnostic process and at times leading to false-positive diagnoses. Managing this balance represents some of the difficulties in identification and treatment of these patients. The authors present a patient who was anesthetized for repair of a suspected ascending aortic dissection based on CT findings, yet subsequent TEE revealed normal anatomy.","PeriodicalId":76700,"journal":{"name":"The Nebraska medical journal","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic dissection.\",\"authors\":\"J. Phalen, J. Saigh\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/b-0034-92220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ACUTE ASCENDING AORTIC DISSECTION is a serious condition with significant mortality requiring prompt diagnosis and surgical treatment as mortality rates increase hourly without intervention. There are a number of modalities currently used to diagnose aortic dissection, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), each with different strengths and weaknesses in regard to speed, accuracy, and ease of performance. There exists a balance between rapid diagnosis with comprehensive information regarding anatomic detail, vascular branch involvement, false lumen identification, and speed with which the diagnosis can be made to expedite potential surgical treatment. The optimal diagnostic mode for identifying ascending aortic dissection remains controversial. Additionally, the various methods of imaging used to evaluate for aortic dissection all carry potential disadvantages of artifact within the image, complicating the diagnostic process and at times leading to false-positive diagnoses. Managing this balance represents some of the difficulties in identification and treatment of these patients. The authors present a patient who was anesthetized for repair of a suspected ascending aortic dissection based on CT findings, yet subsequent TEE revealed normal anatomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Nebraska medical journal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Nebraska medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0034-92220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nebraska medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0034-92220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aortic dissection.
ACUTE ASCENDING AORTIC DISSECTION is a serious condition with significant mortality requiring prompt diagnosis and surgical treatment as mortality rates increase hourly without intervention. There are a number of modalities currently used to diagnose aortic dissection, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), each with different strengths and weaknesses in regard to speed, accuracy, and ease of performance. There exists a balance between rapid diagnosis with comprehensive information regarding anatomic detail, vascular branch involvement, false lumen identification, and speed with which the diagnosis can be made to expedite potential surgical treatment. The optimal diagnostic mode for identifying ascending aortic dissection remains controversial. Additionally, the various methods of imaging used to evaluate for aortic dissection all carry potential disadvantages of artifact within the image, complicating the diagnostic process and at times leading to false-positive diagnoses. Managing this balance represents some of the difficulties in identification and treatment of these patients. The authors present a patient who was anesthetized for repair of a suspected ascending aortic dissection based on CT findings, yet subsequent TEE revealed normal anatomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surfactant Necrotizing enterocolitis "Them" and "us". Aortic dissection. Extracorporeal lithotripsy in Nebraska--10 years later.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1